“I had always liked writing, but I had never experienced the high that came from having my words in a newspaper,” he recalls. “I could be angry or didactic or whimsical and light-hearted. And I could hide behind my byline, engaging and enraging readers as I saw fit. . . . I knew what I wanted to do with my life.”
Boyd next attended the University of Missouri, where he studied journalism on a St. Louis Post-Dispatch scholarship and met his first wife, Sheila Rule, who would precede him in building a distinguished career at the Times. At this point, the coming-of-age tale, so redolent of the late civil-rights era, morphs into a very different but no less effective narrative: that of the ambitious reporter breaking into the industry, learning tough lessons, paying dues, and enduring a series of broken relationships.
Thanks to our peculiar American malady (and to the book’s subtitle), the responses of many readers to this portion of the narrative will be conditioned by their interest in race. That is unfortunate. Boyd’s account of life as a young reporter is one of the best I can recall, and though he is unmistakably black, his tale is utterly universal.
At Missouri, Boyd studied journalism and political science, believing that a second degree would make him more marketable. There he discovered the basic creed common to strong reporters: “A good journalist needs only a keen interest in a particular subject. Curiosity plus legwork becomes expertise.”
In June 1972, following two summers as a copyboy at the Post-Dispatch, Boyd was upgraded to student reporter. On his first day, he asked the city editor where he should sit. “I don’t give a fuck,” came the brusque reply. Retreating to the back of the newsroom, he found an empty desk, and was eventually given an assignment. “My hands were shaking as I began to hunt and peck the keys to type my first story,” he writes. “Don’t let me screw up, I offered a silent prayer to God. Don’t let me screw up.”
After graduation, Boyd was hired. Strolling into the newsroom, he was still nervous, but already harbored ambitions “to win a Pulitzer Prize, to make a million dollars, and to grace the cover of Time magazine—all in my first year.” His editors had other plans, assigning him to a succession of fires and homicides. A mentor told the discouraged novice that talent matters, “but it is never the sole factor in success,” preparing him for a prolonged immersion in office politics.
As it happened, professional breakthroughs would come quickly for Boyd. After a mere two years at the paper, he became the first black reporter to cover city hall for a mainstream St. Louis publication. Soon after, he was named journalist of the year by the Post-Dispatch and the Globe-Democrat—another first for an African-American. By 1978, he was working at the paper’s Washington bureau. In quick succession, Boyd would cover the Reagan White House, win a Nieman Fellowship (youngest ever), and be recruited by The New York Times.
His job interview with the legendary Times editor A. M. Rosenthal went off without a hitch. But when Boyd was ushered into the office of Rosenthal’s deputy, Jimmy Greenfield, to discuss salary and other details, he was served up with an instant indignity: “I really enjoyed your clips—they’re so well written. Did you write them yourself, or did someone write them for you?” On the heels of this exposure to what he calls “the ugly underside of life at the Times,” Boyd (like other black reporters of this era, myself included) was assigned to the euphemistically named “urban affairs” beat.
There would soon be other slights, including those that came in the form of compliments. “You’re our Jackie Robinson,” Boyd was repeatedly told by his superiors. When he was promoted to the Washington bureau, an editor asked him if he were “ready” to begin reporting. Later, when offered the post of Atlanta correspondent, Boyd was told he was perfect for the job, since he could “cover the South as a black man.”

Isn't the real lesson of Boyd's life that you don't need to be white to be, or become, an asshole?
Perhaps he was fired because he had risen to his level of incompetence, not because of the color of his skin.
#1 Posted by Ivan Fyodorovich, CJR on Thu 6 May 2010 at 10:21 AM
Plenty of white assholes get promoted to the very top of newsrooms and remained there, even now, and certainly include former top editors of the NYT. That is a mighty casual and unsupported assertion about a "level of incompetence," one that I've never heard made to justify Gerald's dismissal. Evidence?
#2 Posted by Ken Cooper, CJR on Sat 8 May 2010 at 07:06 AM
Plenty of white assholes get promoted to the very top of newsrooms and remained there, even now, and certainly include former top editors of the NYT. That is a mighty casual and unsupported assertion about a "level of incompetence," one that I've never heard made to justify Gerald's dismissal.
---
He seems to have been well qualified to be the Times' second banana. His assholedom may have gotten him that job; conversely, he may not have been enough of an asshole to become No. 1. Only Mr. Sulzberger would know.
In any event, in reading French's review, this reader came away with the distinct impression that Boyd was no real leader. That has nothing to do with skin color.
#3 Posted by Ivan Fyodorovich, CJR on Mon 10 May 2010 at 01:54 PM
Nobody asked Gerald Boyd---he simply wanted to be the best at his job, and from what I read about him from other people who worked with him, he was more than qualified for the job. He might have been a better leader if he hadn't had to constantly prove himself and be under pressure to work much harder than his white colleagues most of the time. I mean, would a white man be asked if he had written his own newspaper pieces or if somebody else wrote them for him? Hell no---just the fact that he was even asked that--which was an ignorant stupid racist assumption in the first place---just shows by itself that the New York Times needed some diversity VERY badly at the time. Also, Ivan, when do you get off assuming that he just wasn't competent enough to handle the job? Funny how you give his superiors the benefit of the doubt and not Boyd himself. So what if he got there by affirmative action---hell, white boys have benefitted from AA virtually the entire time this country has existed, simply because you're the majority and y'all set up this society for your damn selves only. Don't act like incompetent white men don't ever get jobs because of who they know and who they're related to----look no further than our joke of an ex-president Bush.
#4 Posted by michelle, CJR on Wed 12 May 2010 at 12:53 PM
This.
Tell it like it is, sister, so that everybody can hear!
#5 Posted by Neville A. Ross, CJR on Thu 13 May 2010 at 09:04 AM