Unlike Frank, however, Bageant came to the problem as an insider, as a man who grew up as part of the white, working poor of the South, as someone who understood their prejudices and their fears, their heartache at vanishing ways of life, and the methods by which they measured the good life. He understood working class cynicism, a lack of faith in either political party’s ability, or even desire, to make their lives genuinely better. And he understood their resulting fatalism.
As a child Bageant had lived in the insular, subsistence-farming community of Unger, West Virginia; and later just over the state line in the town of Winchester, years before I-81 was built and the town became a bedroom community for DC commuters. Nestled deep in the Shenandoah Valley, it was a poor, conservative, deeply religious, and suffocatingly class-bound society, dominated by a largely cashless system of favors and exchanges.
Bageant was, in many ways, the misfit of his family. While his ancestors were only marginally educated, Bageant himself was from a young age drawn to books, to art, to music. Later, he would say how he had always felt Winchester offered few opportunities for a poor kid from the ramshackle wooden homes far from the mansions and brick houses of the town’s gentry. Hadley High School routinely lumped the country kids into the “dumbbell room,” and made sure to inform them that they were allowed to leave school at the age of sixteen and could join the Army a year after that.
His teachers told him that because of his background he wasn’t cut out for college, and his parents pressured him to work manual jobs from an early age. So Bageant quit school, joined the Navy, and got married. He was discharged in the heart of the 1960s; making up for lost time, he bought an old school bus and headed for San Francisco. En route, the bus broke down in Boulder, Colorado. Bageant and his young family lived there, sometimes on the bus, for several years, before moving to an Indian reservation in Idaho. During that time, Bageant worked a variety of sweaty, laborious jobs until, in the mid-1970s, he broke his back and had to lie flat for months while he recuperated. It was then, his family recalled, that he started honing his writing skills, using his enforced leisure time to perfect an in-your-face technique that would, over the decades, acquire a cult following. He learned to describe people and scenes intimately, to document his subjects’ idiosyncrasies—a technique that would serve him well in his books on redneck culture. He learned how to make his readers laugh and cry.
But as that voice developed, it left Bageant lacking a natural home in the American class system. He was, says his longtime friend Nick Smart, like Eliza Doolittle in My Fair Lady, made too worldly by education and travel to rejoin the working class from which he had come, yet too shaped by that world to ever feel comfortable as an American burgher. He simply couldn’t, wouldn’t, aver that class didn’t exist and shape lives; nor could he buy into the American fiction that everyone had an equal opportunity in life. “Joe was fearless,” says Smart. “Truth came out of him almost as if he couldn’t stop. But he was also funny as shit. He could see the comic irony of this crazy country we’re living in.”
Throughout the 1990s and early 2000s, Bageant churned out long essays, most of them published online, detailing his thoughts and observations about modern-day America. He was interested in how religion and cultural conservatism were being used by political movements with deeply conservative economic agendas. Like many other contemporary political writers, he was fascinated and depressed by a politics that convinced poor, rural Americans that they should vote not on bread-and-butter issues but for the candidate who most enthusiastically referenced the Bible, talked about guns, and attacked gay rights.

Excuse me … uncomfortable truths? Bageant does nothing but parrot the timeless progressive truism that conservatives are too dumb to see the world “as it really is” and always vote against their common interests. It’s typical left wing condescension for the lumpen. Nothing particularly thought provoking or original about that.
#1 Posted by Mike H, CJR on Tue 27 Sep 2011 at 10:30 AM
Nothing new here, just achingly mechanical interpretations of American complexities.
It would have been interesting if the 'Thomas Frank' question had been reversed - 'What's the Matter with Malibu/Martha's Vineyard/North Chicago?' Residents of these pleasant precincts, by the dogmatically left-wing interpretation of politics, also 'vote against their economic interests'. But the question seldom is asked in the MSM politico-journalistic echo chamber. I suppose the answer is that denizens are more . . . evolved . . . and they . . . think about the big picture and, well, really care about important cultural issues and saving the planet and so forth.
Uh-oh, wait a second. Where does this framing device take us regarding social 'class' in America? Fortuately, CJR and others will never ask the question that prompts the implicit, class-bigoted answer.
If CJR is really interested in being counter-intuitive, and exploring 'unpleasant truths' and so on, they could examine the literature that suggests that (1) affluent people are more socially 'liberal' than others, leading to (2) the paradox that economic liberalism is undercut by the social liberalism, since when you get down to it, economic outcomes depend more on 'culture' than on this or that monetary or fiscal policy. Don't want to mess with your worldview too much, there, CJR.
#2 Posted by Mark Richard, CJR on Tue 27 Sep 2011 at 04:58 PM
CJR seems to attract a disproportionate share of trolls, doesn't it?
It's easy to understand why folks like Mike and Mark want to discourage you from reading Joe Bageant's work. Sure, Joe enjoys ranting, but he actually knows the folks drinking at the Royal Lunch until they need a cab ride home in his home town, Winchester, Va. He can explain how the local power structure of realtors, developers, retailers, bankers and lawyers run things, supported by the right-wing Byrd family's local paper and the right-wing Lewis family's talk radio station. He watched how his father died penniless, and he watches Dottie singing Patsy Cline even when she can't afford to fill her prescriptions.
Mike and Mark don't want you to know about Dottie and her friends, because they really don't want progressives to make common cause with the white underclass. It wouldn't be in their interests.
#3 Posted by BillNRoc, CJR on Thu 29 Sep 2011 at 12:51 PM
To BIllNRoc, first off, I'd post under my own name before calling anyone a 'troll' - a 'troll' seems to be defined as 'someone who is besting a left-winger in an argument'. (Not unlike racist, sexist, homophobe, etc.)
Second, good luck on the dream of uniting the political cultures of Winchester, Virginia with those of Berkeley and Cambridge under one banner. Culture matters. If it didn't, then Manhattan, which has a mean value of about a million dollars for the average address. Maybe Barbara Ehrenreich will look into that in her next book, but I doubt it.
#4 Posted by Mark Richard, CJR on Sat 1 Oct 2011 at 05:47 PM
SO?
Why .. of course. The 30,000,000 illegals who have invaded the USA are deluded. They ought to return home and tell "The Economist" that the USA is a lousy place.
For every Mike Moore -- there 100,000 illegals that would be happy to live in his $5,000,000 Manhattan co-op. Yes, American capitalism is terrible.
LOL, ROTF.
#5 Posted by R.P., CJR on Tue 4 Oct 2011 at 08:22 PM
Read his blog and essays here: http://www.joebageant.com
#6 Posted by Ed Westfield Jr., CJR on Wed 5 Oct 2011 at 02:50 PM
I'm in the deep south, and Joe's people are my people, and I sometimes work at benefits for terminally sick kids without health insurance. Almost without exception their parents are voting against their own self-interests, voting for people who think their situation is their own fault for not trying hard enough. My people fuel the lotteries in their hope that some day they too might be millionaires, and they won't want to give any of it up when they get there – even though 65% of current millionaires say they wouldn't mind giving up more.
I miss the old right wing. It was no stranger to Christianity, and it didn't have to try so hard to justify itself.
#7 Posted by stephen broussard, CJR on Fri 7 Oct 2011 at 10:22 AM