While Pittman’s adversarial style paid major dividends, it should be obvious that his approach would not gain him the kind of telepathic rapport that Sorkin seems to have developed with the Fed chairman (“. . . the towering white peaks of the Tetons offered a majestic view, but one that no longer took Ben Bernanke’s breath away the way it once had.”)
Readers should be aware of the differences in reporting styles and understand them for what they are: a division of labor. Neither will give you the full picture; one aims to tell you what the players said, while the other tells you what they did.
But even with that caveat, TBTF does show some of the downside of relying so heavily on Wall Street insiders. For one thing, in six hundred pages, there’s surprisingly little news here. As noted, there is a torrent of previously unreported facts—but most of them amount to historical footnotes, not major revelations that alter our fundamental understanding of events. One notable exception: Sorkin demonstrates that Goldman executives’ bluster about the firm’s viability was just that—bluster. They were terrified. On most of the big questions, Sorkin’s details tend to support official versions of events (which is not necessarily a bad thing). The revisionist charge that the decision to let Lehman fail was made in bad faith is contradicted by the book’s depiction of Paulson (a “straight-shooting Midwesterner”) as selflessly and tirelessly trying to do the right thing, despite ankle-biting from the press and Congress. Likewise, Sorkin helps to debunk the theory that Goldman engineered the aig bailout with a scene that shows Geithner himself floating the idea.
It’s worth remembering at this point that it was Gretchen Morgenson, followed closely by Pittman, who first uncovered the story about Goldman’s interest in the AIG bailout back in September 2008. In a sense, the rest of the business press has been following them ever since, acting as though the information had popped up out of a toaster.
I would go so far as to say that despite the quote at the top of this story, TBTF doesn’t even deliver many warts. The catty zingers, embarrassing screw-ups, and devious maneuvers are surprisingly few and far between, though Lehman’s number two, Joe Gregory, does take it on the chin more than once.
The biggest problem, of course, is not the shortage of dirt. It is that the book requires readers to forget that virtually all of the institutions cited, not to mention several of the individuals barking out forceful commands, played key roles in causing the very crisis they are shown here seeking to ameliorate.
To say that this book suffers from its narrow focus is a wild understatement. History here begins with the collapse of Bear Stearns in the spring of 2008 and ends with the collapse of Lehman Brothers in the fall. Everybody’s scrambling, but it’s never clear exactly what caused the problems in the first place.
A Martian reading TBTF would have no inkling that Fuld, Paulson, Citigroup, and the like were essentially cleaning up their own mess. This creates a sense of disconnect you can drive a Town Car through. Take this scene at a 2008 dinner for the G7 Summit in Washington, in which Paulson shares his anxieties about leverage with Fuld:
“I’m worried about a lot of things,” Paulson now told Fuld, singling out a new IMF report estimating that mortgage-and real-estate related writedowns could total $945 billion in the next two years. He said he was also anxious about the staggering amount of leverage—the amount of debt to equity—that the investment banks were still using to juice their returns. That only added enormous risk to the system, he complained.
But it was Goldman, with Paulson at the helm, that strenuously lobbied for looser capital requirements in 2004, unleashing the sort of leverage that Paulson is seen fretting about. And it was Paulson’s Goldman (as Pittman’s reporting revealed back in 2007) that did more than its share to create the defective securities that are seen melting down in TBTF. Sorkin explains none of this.

Whine whine whine. Columbia keeps turning out mediocre reporters, and Starkman keeps picking nits and finding fault with everything. If I want sanctimony I'll go to church.
#1 Posted by L. Lloyd Samuels, CJR on Thu 11 Mar 2010 at 03:55 PM
A "once-in-a-generation journalist"?
I think I just threw up a little.
#2 Posted by Richard, CJR on Thu 11 Mar 2010 at 04:19 PM
At least it's better than Gasparino's book: no anecdotes, no analysis, only wind.
#3 Posted by Steve Klein, CJR on Thu 11 Mar 2010 at 04:30 PM
No news in the book? I should hope not. The author writes for a daily newspaper, you know. If he knows any news, that is where it should be found.
#4 Posted by Harry Eagar, CJR on Thu 11 Mar 2010 at 04:42 PM
Another inside story begins to sound like a yawn...The political undercurrents are what's important to grasp now and how it relates to rubbish talk like "to big to fail", and rubbish words like "derivatives" (yet to be clearly explained). Take pause and examine recent history, circa fascist Italy 1930's and 40',bailing out their plutocrats with public monies, arming the right and beating up the left ..all repeating itself during Seattle 1999 and the WTO; or the Greens, G20 in Pennsylvania. Police riot gear on full display, in use, shows to all of us what IS ongoing and what IS perfectly clear, government riot control against a fed up nation!.
#5 Posted by elmer fuddieee, CJR on Fri 12 Mar 2010 at 12:45 AM
This review captures what I've been telling everyone abut TBTF. It serves up the gossip of the crisis and never gets near the bone.
#6 Posted by Michael M. Thomas, CJR on Fri 12 Mar 2010 at 08:50 AM
This review reminds me of a review of a book on great hitters in baseball, that pointed how how it never talked about how the uniforms were made.
#7 Posted by J Scott Brown, CJR on Fri 12 Mar 2010 at 10:25 AM
I read TBTF with great interest and anticipation, and agree 100% with this assessment. It's great read. Great job of reporting. But I didn't feel after 600 pages that it added much to our understanding of the causes of the crisis, or its significance.
#8 Posted by Marc Gunther, CJR on Fri 12 Mar 2010 at 02:15 PM
It's a great fictional narrative that plays well with our modern times. Great journalism? Far from it. Sorkin is an insider and he shows why. With recent revelations about Leahman's repo transactions, Sorkin's book was exposed for what it is--a gloss over of the biggest heist in American financial hsitory. He made Fuld look like an angel. I understand the reasoning. As a journalist he wants to maintain his access to these people. Pragmatic? Sure. Cynical? Absolutely. But this is not journalism. I don't know what values/Ethics you teach at Columbia.
#9 Posted by Martin dugard, CJR on Sun 14 Mar 2010 at 12:30 PM
Richard, you are right about the nausea, I got it too.
Great review of a book that follows the crumbs dribbled by those who lead and feed the GFC. I suspect Sorkin is not up to a sequel, highlighting the options to avoid this tendency of Wall St Institutions to drive the economy off the top of the cliff with the Leeming like acquiescence of Regulators and Politicians. The end result of course is that the non participants in this game of fraud are the ones to suffer.
#10 Posted by Anechidna, CJR on Fri 19 Mar 2010 at 05:00 PM
I don't think it is fair criticism to complain that Sorkin wrote the wrong book. No one book could cover both the events of mid-to-late 2008 and get into depth about root causes. That would be 2000-pager that ordinary human beings couldn't even lift, let alone read.
If he got facts wrong, if he misrepresented reality, then have at it. But unless you are his assignment editor, his choice of topics is his call not yours.
#11 Posted by garhighway, CJR on Mon 23 Aug 2010 at 10:18 AM