As for Fuld, surely some passing mention of Lehman’s role in fueling predatory lending and toxic underwriting would have helped readers put the madcap events of 2008 in context. It was the Times itself, after all, that revealed how deeply intertwined Lehman was in predatory lending with a seminal 2000 exposé by Diana Henriques and Lowell Bergman, work that was amplified by other reporters, including The Wall Street Journal’s Mike Hudson in 2007. Lehman’s (and Wall Street’s) neck-deep involvement in subprime is hardly a secret at this point.
And it’s not only backstory that gets tossed off the private plane. An exposé by The Wall Street Journal in October 2008 made a devastating case that in the weeks before the fall—which is to say, right in the middle of Sorkin’s timeline—Fuld and his team had grossly misrepresented Lehman’s financial position. Do we get any hint of this from TBTF? No. Instead, we are offered a glance at Fuld’s morale-building techniques:
To encourage teamwork, he adopted a point system similar to the one that he used to reward his son, Richie, when he played hockey. Fuld taped his son’s game and would inform him: “You get one point for a goal, but two points for an assist.”
Fuld clearly cooperated fully for this book. As it happens, he is the only figure whose motives are explicitly characterized—as someone who is “driven less by greed than by an overpowering desire to preserve the firm he loved.”
To some degree, TBTF suffers from what I call the Avatar problem. In the movie, a youthful outsider immerses himself in an exotic culture of larger-than-life figures, and ultimately begins to see things from their point of view. Indeed, he winds up riding the big red Banshee.
In the book’s final paragraphs Sorkin finally drops the mask of objectivity and offers his own view of the protagonists. He reports that Jamie Dimon sent a note of encouragement to Hank Paulson, in which the JPMorgan Chase ceo quoted Teddy Roosevelt’s famous “man in the arena” passage (“It is not the critic who counts: not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena . . . .”). Sorkin writes:
It was a remarkable quote for Dimon to have chosen. While Roosevelt’s words describe a hero, they were deeply ambiguous about whether that hero succeeded or failed. And so it is with Paulson, Geithner, Bernanke and the dozens of public and private-sector figures who populate this drama. It will be left to history to judge how they fared during their own time “in the arena.”
This is, in a sense, Wall Street’s view of itself: well-intentioned men who dare to take risks while timid souls (the press, politicians, investors, borrowers, taxpayers) carp and complain. It doesn’t take much critical distance to realize that this is not the whole story, not by a long shot.
For all its flaws, TBTF remains a work of extraordinary reportage that gives readers access to some of the nation’s most powerful financial figures. It’s also a reminder, however, that on Wall Street, nothing is ever free.

Whine whine whine. Columbia keeps turning out mediocre reporters, and Starkman keeps picking nits and finding fault with everything. If I want sanctimony I'll go to church.
#1 Posted by L. Lloyd Samuels, CJR on Thu 11 Mar 2010 at 03:55 PM
A "once-in-a-generation journalist"?
I think I just threw up a little.
#2 Posted by Richard, CJR on Thu 11 Mar 2010 at 04:19 PM
At least it's better than Gasparino's book: no anecdotes, no analysis, only wind.
#3 Posted by Steve Klein, CJR on Thu 11 Mar 2010 at 04:30 PM
No news in the book? I should hope not. The author writes for a daily newspaper, you know. If he knows any news, that is where it should be found.
#4 Posted by Harry Eagar, CJR on Thu 11 Mar 2010 at 04:42 PM
Another inside story begins to sound like a yawn...The political undercurrents are what's important to grasp now and how it relates to rubbish talk like "to big to fail", and rubbish words like "derivatives" (yet to be clearly explained). Take pause and examine recent history, circa fascist Italy 1930's and 40',bailing out their plutocrats with public monies, arming the right and beating up the left ..all repeating itself during Seattle 1999 and the WTO; or the Greens, G20 in Pennsylvania. Police riot gear on full display, in use, shows to all of us what IS ongoing and what IS perfectly clear, government riot control against a fed up nation!.
#5 Posted by elmer fuddieee, CJR on Fri 12 Mar 2010 at 12:45 AM
This review captures what I've been telling everyone abut TBTF. It serves up the gossip of the crisis and never gets near the bone.
#6 Posted by Michael M. Thomas, CJR on Fri 12 Mar 2010 at 08:50 AM
This review reminds me of a review of a book on great hitters in baseball, that pointed how how it never talked about how the uniforms were made.
#7 Posted by J Scott Brown, CJR on Fri 12 Mar 2010 at 10:25 AM
I read TBTF with great interest and anticipation, and agree 100% with this assessment. It's great read. Great job of reporting. But I didn't feel after 600 pages that it added much to our understanding of the causes of the crisis, or its significance.
#8 Posted by Marc Gunther, CJR on Fri 12 Mar 2010 at 02:15 PM
It's a great fictional narrative that plays well with our modern times. Great journalism? Far from it. Sorkin is an insider and he shows why. With recent revelations about Leahman's repo transactions, Sorkin's book was exposed for what it is--a gloss over of the biggest heist in American financial hsitory. He made Fuld look like an angel. I understand the reasoning. As a journalist he wants to maintain his access to these people. Pragmatic? Sure. Cynical? Absolutely. But this is not journalism. I don't know what values/Ethics you teach at Columbia.
#9 Posted by Martin dugard, CJR on Sun 14 Mar 2010 at 12:30 PM
Richard, you are right about the nausea, I got it too.
Great review of a book that follows the crumbs dribbled by those who lead and feed the GFC. I suspect Sorkin is not up to a sequel, highlighting the options to avoid this tendency of Wall St Institutions to drive the economy off the top of the cliff with the Leeming like acquiescence of Regulators and Politicians. The end result of course is that the non participants in this game of fraud are the ones to suffer.
#10 Posted by Anechidna, CJR on Fri 19 Mar 2010 at 05:00 PM
I don't think it is fair criticism to complain that Sorkin wrote the wrong book. No one book could cover both the events of mid-to-late 2008 and get into depth about root causes. That would be 2000-pager that ordinary human beings couldn't even lift, let alone read.
If he got facts wrong, if he misrepresented reality, then have at it. But unless you are his assignment editor, his choice of topics is his call not yours.
#11 Posted by garhighway, CJR on Mon 23 Aug 2010 at 10:18 AM