Ryan opens his story in the coastal village of La Roche-Guyon. He lingers there for only two pages, long enough to establish the date (June 4), the weather (gray, misty), and the sounds of dawn (a church bell ending the nighttime curfew and heralding day 1,451 of the German occupation) before introducing his most compelling character, Field Marshal Erwin Rommel. When we meet him, the German commander—and D-Day’s biggest loser—is awaiting the invasion in the village’s castle. It is a neatly accomplished piece of foreshadowing; Ryan sprinkles in his facts without gumming up the machinery, and delivers an implicit promise to the reader. You want details? You want characters? I’ve got a million of ’em.
The author immediately makes good, tightening his focus on Hitler’s most celebrated general:
In the ground-floor room he used as an office, Rommel was alone. He sat behind a massive Renaissance desk, working by the light of a single desk lamp. The room was large and high-ceilinged. Along one wall stretched a faded Gobelin tapestry. On another the haughty face of Duke Francois de la Rochefoucauld—a seventeenth-century writer of maxims and an ancestor of the present Duke—looked down out of a heavy gold frame. There were a few chairs casually placed on the highly polished parquet floor and thick draperies at the windows, but little else.
Nothing slows the eye’s journey across the page; the author feels no compulsion to call out, “Look over here, it’s me!” And this makes it easy to miss what is so striking about this otherwise simple passage: the efficient accumulation of fact.
We learn that Rommel was a) alone, b) seated at a desk that was c) massive and d) Renaissance and fitted with a single lamp, and that he worked under the gaze of e) Duke Francois de la Rochefoucauld whose face was f) haughty and whose portrait was framed in g) gold. And then, quite subtly, Ryan offers a quick peek at his character: “In particular, there was nothing of Rommel in this room but himself.” Not a photograph of his wife (Lucie-Maria) or son (Manfred, age fifteen) or mementos of his great victories in North Africa, such as the field marshal’s baton Hitler had presented him (eighteen inches, three pounds, gold, red velvet covered with gold eagles and black swastikas) because such extravagance, Ryan writes, was alien to Rommel, a man who “cared so little for food that he sometimes forgot to eat.”
Rommel did not know when the Allies were coming nor where they would land. But, Ryan tells us, his defenses were stretched thin and he decided to return to Germany and plead for more materiel from Hitler. He would stop at home along the way to present a pair of shoes (gray suede, size five and a half) to his wife on her birthday, June 6.
Size five and a half? How did he get that?
Cornelius Ryan was at Normandy twice on D-Day, the first time on a bomber flying over the beaches, the second time on a patrol boat that took him back after he landed in England. He had turned twenty-four the day before. He had been working as a war correspondent for London’s The Daily Telegraph since 1943, having come to London from Dublin in 1940, and to journalism a year later at Reuters, after attending a school where he studied violin. He covered the air war over Germany—perilous work—as well as Patton’s Third Army, then reported from the Pacific.
In 1947, Ryan moved to the United States, where he became a naturalized citizen and, eventually, a writer for Time, Newsweek, and, until its demise in 1956, Collier’s. By then, he had written four books, including two about Douglas MacArthur, and another, One Minute to Ditch, about an airliner’s ocean landing. He also published a good many magazine stories that, taken together, reflected less a budding literary career—“I Rode in the World’s Fastest Sub”—than the workmanlike yield of a man who knew how to churn out copy.

Thanks for writing about Cornelius Ryan and The Longest Day--a fascinating and valuable book. I remember reading it with awe as a kid-- I'm sure I didn't understand everything I read but I do remember the almost cinematic "you are there" clarity of Ryan's writing, the "scene" you describe.
#1 Posted by SBatchelor, CJR on Thu 13 May 2010 at 03:06 PM
Excellent piece on an unjustly neglected Irish writer. I may be wrong but I seem to recall that he made an appearance on Irish TV during the seventies, on a show called The Late Late Show, so at least he had some measure of acclaim in his native country. I hope this piece brings him the attention he deserves.
#2 Posted by Paul Duane, CJR on Sat 15 May 2010 at 05:10 AM
Ryan's contribution to the development of the U.S. space programme is also underrated. At Collier's he edited a seminal series called "Man Will Conquer Space Soon!". I am always struck by how often these articles are cited today by leaders of the U.S. space programme as the inspiration that drew them into the business.
#3 Posted by Leo Enright, CJR on Sat 15 May 2010 at 07:46 AM
I read Longest Day whlle in uniform in the early 60s.
Made a profound effect on me in some subliminal way.
It's part of our history, our culture and who we are.
#4 Posted by VJ, CJR on Sun 16 May 2010 at 11:19 AM
I too vaguely remember Cornelius Ryan being interviewed on the Irish television Late Late Show. He received some recognition in the old country. Literary fashions are finicky. Hemingway gets some attention in the academy but Steinbeck is ignored, although the latter's novels achieved greater worldwide sales. Surely The Grapes of Wrath was a defining moment in nonfictional fiction - a literary reporting on the tragic dispersal of the dustbowl victims, the Okies?
#5 Posted by Gabriel Bonner, CJR on Mon 17 May 2010 at 07:40 AM
Interesting article.....be more careful of grammar ....the title should be "whom "not "who"
#6 Posted by trev greene, CJR on Mon 17 May 2010 at 11:08 AM
I agree with Trev Greene. I had to read the title twice, and then a third time to be sure who had forgotten whom. But I'm nearly 80. As a teenager back then in Scotland I knew quite a number of young men not much older than myself who were in Normandy from Day 1. One of them survived a direct hit on his tank, the only surviver he told us. He had the scars to prove it. Another was (later) at the attack on Arnhem (Market Garden) and spent the last 9 months of the war as a POW somewhere in Germany.
#7 Posted by j. p. ward, CJR on Mon 17 May 2010 at 12:01 PM
"The Longest Day" is clearly well-reported, no problem there. I discovered as I read it that great reportage is not nearly enough to keep me reading a book. As to the movie version - it's a classic example of Hollywood's (occasional) ability to improve significantly over the book.
#8 Posted by B. Frost, CJR on Mon 17 May 2010 at 03:53 PM
hi
#9 Posted by Maurice Isserman, CJR on Mon 17 May 2010 at 06:48 PM
More editing. It should be "or where they would land".
Rommel did not know when the Allies were coming nor where they would land.
#10 Posted by John Young, CJR on Mon 17 May 2010 at 07:55 PM
How can you say that?
negative with "nor".
neither - nor
not this, nor that.
did not know when, nor where.
but I think Irish, Scottish, English, American English
mixes it all up anyway.
Depends, of course, also, on how the author wants it to sound.
#11 Posted by john, CJR on Mon 17 May 2010 at 08:18 PM
I have The Longest Day on my bookshelf. Time to re-read it.
#12 Posted by Leon Engelbrech, CJR on Tue 18 May 2010 at 05:54 AM
Thanx for the essay. Too many forgotten giants. It is great to save reporters like Ryan and Shirer. Good job.
#13 Posted by Gianni Riotta, CJR on Tue 18 May 2010 at 09:59 AM
Grammar be damned, one of the best and most inspiring articles I've read lately! Kudos to M. Shapiro for creating a three-dimensional vision of a relatively unsung hero to writers, history/military buffs, and to the true and rare journalists, who only want to tell the truth. Congratulations & well done!
#14 Posted by Linda, CJR on Tue 18 May 2010 at 08:07 PM
The novel may be redundant, reducible to twenty "masterplots" as some handbooks allege, but works of nonfiction never will be, so long as there is a tomorrow.
#15 Posted by Charles J. Shields, CJR on Wed 19 May 2010 at 08:59 AM
[...] Cornelius Ryan, Reporter [...]
http://berfrois.com/
#16 Posted by Berfrois, CJR on Wed 19 May 2010 at 09:13 AM
I remember very well reading the book as a young man and how it really made me understand what had happened on that day. I also recall wondering how he had ever got all that informaiton
#17 Posted by Stephen Farrar, CJR on Wed 19 May 2010 at 08:52 PM
Thank you for a great article. My personal favorite is "A Bridge Too Far".
#18 Posted by Jeff Maxfield, CJR on Sat 22 May 2010 at 09:20 AM
A fine article, and thanks for the small details which add so much to my understanding of Cornelius John "Connie" Ryan. I first read his posthumously published memoir A Private Battle in high school and was captivated by his writing style as well as the force and great charm of his personality. That's one book I can say, without reservation or sentimentality, changed the course of my life.
#19 Posted by Ann Keefer, CJR on Tue 25 May 2010 at 01:49 PM
Congrats to Trev Greene. Teach that headline writer: He=Who, Him=Whom. Turn the sentence around and you should get Time Forgot Him, not Time Forgot He.
#20 Posted by Stuart, CJR on Sat 29 May 2010 at 09:40 PM
As a biographer and author of several "literary non-fiction" books, you made me appreciate where the genre began. Ryan's interviewing process and the research he amassed paved the way for a genuine re-telling of the day. As every non-fiction writer knows, there is no replacement for good interviewing; if you don't have it, a reader senses it within the first few pages. Undoubtedly, I will find a copy of "The Longest Day" and soak in his accomplishment -- maybe even learn from it.
As for all the editing comments -- that's one of the problems with the internet. Non-starters have a forum to criticize and nit-pick, when, if they had the courage, they would have written something and put it out there themselves. They have no idea how many hands have an impact on the writing/editing process and from where a grammatical error might have slipped into a piece. Put up or shut up.
Lovely piece.
#21 Posted by Bob Spitz, CJR on Sun 6 Jun 2010 at 11:04 AM
Thanks for the great article. I heard an interview with Mr. Shapiro on On The Media and went searching for this. Having never read The Longest Day, I am now eager to do so.
#22 Posted by bob neubauer, CJR on Fri 18 Jun 2010 at 01:09 PM
Cornelius Ryan murdered his son because he had long hair and used drugs. He got off scott free. No one ever seems to mention this.
#23 Posted by Tom Cedergren, CJR on Sat 31 Jul 2010 at 09:04 AM
I just happened upon this page....after getting 2 copies of The Longest Day to give to my two sons-in-law. They are in their thirties and are history buffs but don't have too much time for casual reading so I figured Cornelius Ryan is as good as any for helping to get these guys better versed in WW2.
It is pretty bad how illiterate (not my sons-in-law but their generation and younger) young people are about fairly recent U.S. history.
I'm in my 60's but happen to have dozens (and I mean dozens) of young people (under 30) in my life who come for visits and to hang out. They are all college educated and smart kids, however, it is shocking.....Shocking......how ignorant they are about the basics of WW2 and all that led up to it and the major players and the important battles. When obama stupidly and insultingly returned the bust of Churchill to the British, how many among us even realized how awful that was? Who among us could even fathom the idiocy of that and what it might possibly indicate regarding the mind of this megalomaniac we've put in office?
The lack of historical perspective is appallingly bad and , perhaps, re-reading Ryan will help budge that stronghold bit by bit.
#24 Posted by sally, CJR on Mon 9 Aug 2010 at 11:37 PM
Not only a paean to a great journalist, but also an important contribution to journalism history -- bravo, Mr. Shapiro.
"I am a reporter," Cornelius Ryan once said. "If I am some help to serious historians, I'll be satisfied....There is no reason for history to be dull."
With this article, Shapiro makes that case all over again.
#25 Posted by J.F. McKenna, CJR on Mon 23 Aug 2010 at 08:33 PM
Thank you Michael for this article. Means a lot to what remains of his family that you understood and were able to elucidate just what made my dad so special.
#26 Posted by Geoffrey Ryan, CJR on Fri 21 Jan 2011 at 06:33 AM
Thank you Michael for this article. Means a lot to what remains of his family that you understood and were able to elucidate just what made my dad so special.
And no, my dad didn't murder me.
#27 Posted by Geoffrey Ryan, CJR on Fri 21 Jan 2011 at 06:36 AM
Hi,
Thanks for writing about Con Ryan, he was my fathers double first cousin and my dad, who passed away in 2004 went to school with him and grew up next door to him so he spoke of him often.
I remember the books in the house growing up, thanks for reminding me.
Paula
#28 Posted by Paula Ryan, CJR on Fri 18 Mar 2011 at 10:11 AM
We recently visited Berlin (did the insider tour with Nigel Dunkley - Nigel is great btw), and had to then find a great readable book about the Battle for Berlin.
I found it on my Kindle: The Last Battle : The Fall of Berlin, 1945.
What an amazing book. It´s great to read a contemporary account, and based on interviewing some of the participants.
John Sergeant
#29 Posted by John Sergeant, CJR on Mon 11 Jul 2011 at 04:53 PM
Ryan's son, Geoffrey, survived him. I remember A Private Battle depicted conflicts with his son, but they reconciled before his death.
#30 Posted by Rob Hyde, CJR on Sat 16 Jul 2011 at 11:16 PM
Cornelius Ryan's famous work was the basis for all my years of writing on military history. His style, the subject matter. Without a doubt, my favorite author, and my guide.
Thanks, Mr. Ryan.
#31 Posted by Peter Margaritis, CJR on Mon 23 Apr 2012 at 01:09 PM
I am planning a trip to Berlin and currently finishing his "Last Battle". From page 1, I could tell that he was a very gifted reporter who was really fascinated by the history he was writing about. This fascination rubs off on the reader because of his dedication to piecing together the true story with facts from a multitude of angles and first-person accounts. His dedication to painstaking research is clearly obvious. This approach makes the reader feel as if he is a "fly on the wall" during one of the greatest military campaigns in human history. For all these reasons, I too say, Thanks Mr. Ryan.
#32 Posted by Tony Likovich Jr., CJR on Fri 14 Sep 2012 at 01:09 AM