Members of the president’s own party appear to have been taken in by the spin as well. Earlier this month, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner had to, as New York’s Jonathan Chait put it, “break out the hand puppets and head up to Capitol Hill for a quick lesson.” According to Politico, “Geithner tried to assuage concerns by telling Democrats that the president’s plan would ensure that all taxpayers would pay the lower tax rates on their first $250,000 of income—and they would be hit with higher tax rates only for earned income over that threshold.” Conversely, Republicans who support extending all the Bush tax cuts have no incentive to correct Obama or the Democrats when they exaggerate the extent to which taxes would be increased on wealthy Americans.
Misunderstandings among political elites are no excuse, however. The misreporting of this story reflects two key weaknesses of political journalism—a lack of policy expertise and a weakness for narrative. Too many journalists don’t understand the tax code or other aspects of budget or fiscal policy especially well. Moreover, they have little incentive to add nuance or detail to their stories given the overwhelming priority given to dramatizing political conflict in entertaining ways. The idea that Obama would raise taxes on all income earned by the wealthy feeds perfectly into the spin from both campaigns. Why complicate things?
- 1
- 2
As you correctly point out, the problem is not merely ignorance of marginal rates but also ignorance that the threshold is not $250,000 but rather taxable income of $250,000 for families or $200,000 for individuals. It's remarkable how often the latter figure is ignored by reporters, editors, commentators and even esteemed professors.
#1 Posted by RobC, CJR on Thu 26 Jul 2012 at 05:22 PM
So the president of the United States, famed for his eloquence and backed up by talented speechwriters, can't even describe it correctly --- and you're beating up on some AP hack?
Maybe the nuances of marginal-income tax rates are just hard to describe in English prose.
#2 Posted by Bruce Ross, CJR on Thu 26 Jul 2012 at 06:26 PM
.
Ah! There IS a nickel's worth of difference between Republicans and Democrats! (In election season rhetoric, at least.) Exactly one nickel!
#3 Posted by Dan A., CJR on Fri 27 Jul 2012 at 08:50 AM