Save the Plain Dealer says it better than I can, so I’ll just add emphasis:
We have no doubt that the gifted Plain Dealer journalists whose jobs were spared will continue to do good work. But they will do so in spite of, not because of, the radical changes that Advance Publications is imposing on its newspapers. Nationwide, the New Jersey-based company, owned by one of America’s richest families, has gotten rid of more than 1,500 journalists’ jobs since launching its ill-conceived “digital first” strategy in 2012. Fewer journalists inevitably means fewer in-depth stories, less comprehensive coverage, and reduced oversight, commentary and critical thinking. The remaining newsroom personnel at The Plain Dealer will struggle under an Advance business model that stresses quantity over quality of news, and under the direction of some managers who seem obsessed with trivia and sensationalism.
Throughout the past year, the Save The Plain Dealer campaign and the Newspaper Guild have worked to oppose these disastrous changes, and to warn the public of the impending harm to their daily newspaper. These layoffs mark a low point, but not an end, of that effort.
A grim coda.
And here is some response on Twitter.
I'm a faithful 7-day 15-yr subscriber to the #PlainDealer. I'm sickened about the layoffs & new format. I like ink on my hands. Sad day.
— Juls (@Tribechic) July 31, 2013
As a veteran of The Call, I hurt for my #PlainDealer friends and feel disgust for the gutless and graceless PD management.
— Melissa Hebert (@MelissaHebert) July 31, 2013
Lots of good memories growing up with the @PlainDealer. Really bummed to see all of the spectacular journalists they let go.
— Beth Gaertner (@lookforbeth) July 31, 2013
Horrible news for the @PlainDealer and for Ohio. Dems thoughts are with all reporters at the PD tonight. http://t.co/FjlD8l6h3I
— Ohio Dems (@OHDems) July 30, 2013
Sad day for the #newspaper I grew up with as @PlainDealer lays off 50; thinking of those who got this call: http://t.co/wnXqZMsSmU
— Rebecca McKinsey (@RebeccaMcKinsey) July 31, 2013
The @PlainDealer has cut a third of its newsroom staff? Ugh. https://t.co/HpwJEfd2LG
— Jennifer Howard (@JenHoward) July 31, 2013
Art & archit. critic @Steven_Litt survives the purge @PlainDealer but says: "It's a very hard day for journalism & civic life in Cleveland."
— Lee Rosenbaum (@CultureGrrl) July 31, 2013
Health isn't big at all in Cleveland. #plaindealer RT @vincethepolack PD health reporter Ellen Kleinerman among those laid off.
— ChrisHy (@chrishy) July 31, 2013

typical circle jerk from cjr. why not tell it like it is?
#1 Posted by vonlasching, CJR on Thu 1 Aug 2013 at 03:59 PM
Gannett -- even with its new paywalls -- cut 150 just today. In 2012, there were 2,600 jobs cuts, according to ASNE. The Advocate, the paper that's being cheered by many for expanding in New Orleans, recently announced it is offering buyouts to "rightsize." Even CJR has had to cutback its staff this year, according to Poynter. No matter the company/nonprofit, these are tough decisions that upend people's lives, but that's the unfortunate reality in the entire world of journalism today. What Advance is doing is trying to remake its newsrooms/advertising depts in order to become viable long-term, making its bet, far bigger than most, on growing digital. Yet CJR seems fixated on Advance, conveniently ignoring or downplaying these others. But honestly this whole debate misses the real issue -- how all these companies can figure out how to best serve and create a business from their local/regional advertisers. If local/regional media companies can't learn how to deliver on that in the 21st century, paywalls, porous or otherwise, won't preserve anything. That's not as sexy as focusing on what's happening to newsrooms, but it's the story that deserves much more attention and depth and at the end of day will largely determine the extent we'll have professional reporting across our country.
#2 Posted by wag the dog, CJR on Thu 1 Aug 2013 at 11:12 PM