But Samsung’s lawyers countered that Fidler’s video put the design into the public domain in 1994, well before Apple filed its patent. (They mentioned his 1981 essay, too.) Samsung’s lawyers also noted that when Apple filed its patent, the company made no mention of Fidler’s device even though the company, which had its lab next to Fidler’s, knew of it because it had worked with him and his lab. The U.S. District judge in the case, Lucy H. Koh, declined Apple’s request to halt sales of the Galaxy Tab, in part because she found Samsung’s argument about Fidler’s tablet convincing.
Fidler will testify against Apple as a paid witness.
If you’ve never seen that 1994 Knight-Ridder video introducing the tablet computer and what it would mean for news, watch it:
And while you’re at it, read Michael Shapiro on “The Newspaper That Almost Seized the Future,” from CJR’s November/December issue.