Your Decline and Fall Moment of the Day comes from Standard & Poor’s, the credit-ratings firm that was a core cause of the financial crisis and economic catastrophe.
The press reported late tonight that S&P was about to downgrade the sovereign debt of the United States from AAA, despite last week’s debt-ceiling deal—a momentous decision surely not taken lightly and based on bulletproof analysis.
But hold on! The Obama administration looks at it for a couple of hours and phones up S&P to tell it that its math is all wrong.
S&P officials notified the Treasury Department early Friday afternoon it was planning to downgrade the U.S. government’s debt from the AAA rating it has held for decades, a government official said, and it presented its report to the White House. S&P has previously warned such a downgrade might come if Washington didn’t move to comprehensively tackle its long-term fiscal woes.
After two hours of analysis, Treasury officials discovered that S&P officials had miscalculated future deficit projections by close to $2 trillion. It immediately notified the company of the mistakes.
I’m going to give you a brief synopsis of events here. The financial crisis wouldn’t have happened without S&P (and Moody’s) conflict-riddled AAA ratings of toxic mortgage bonds laundered by Wall Street. Obama and Congress did nothing to rein in the power of the ratings firms after this became apparent to everybody. These same raters, still with government-granted monopoly power and an outsized role in markets, tell Treasury they’re going to downgrade the most widely held financial instrument in the world.
Treasury, in two hours, looks at S&P’s analysis and says, “You idiots missed $2 trillion.” S&P says, “Hey, you know what? You’re right. Oopsie! But we still may downgrade you.”
And this is how our system works. These are the people we’ve empowered with our economic future.
— Paul Krugman notes that, just as the mythical bond vigilantes are in full retreat, with Treasury bond yields nearing all-time lows, inflation is beginning to tumble again.
A little while back many people made a big deal over the fact that measures of core inflation, if you took monthly data at an annual rate, were running above 3 percent. Some of us tried to make the case that this wasn’t really reflecting a big rise in underlying inflation, that it was mainly “contamination” of the core by transitory effects of commodity prices; but this brought much jeering.
Anyway, you should know that just about all measures of core inflation have now subsided rather dramatically…
Guess what: inflation is not taking off, it’s slumping back to around a 1 percent annual rate.
That not only signals a terrible economy, it makes it harder to pay off debts, both private and public.
Can anyone tell me a major thing Krugman has been wrong on in the last three or four years?
— Here are the last three paragraphs of a Journal Heard on the Street soothingly headlined “Stress Indicators Don’t Signal 2008 Repeat”
However, other indicators are at danger levels. The iTraxx Senior Financials credit default-swap index, which measures the cost of insuring the debt of 25 large European banks and insurers for five years, hit a record Friday at €212,000 to insure €10 million of debt, above levels seen in March 2009. That is worrying: High long-term bank-funding costs will hit the cost and availability of credit for the wider economy, reinforcing doubts over economic growth and fiscal sustainability.
But Spanish and Italian bond spreads versus risk-free bonds may prove the best indicator of whether a repeat of 2008 is in store. These have recently reached euro-era records. A further selloff could trigger calls for extra margin from LCH Clearnet to clear bond trades. When Irish and Portuguese bonds were hit with margin increases, it proved a decisive moment; faced with independent confirmation that the bonds contained credit risk, investors rushed to sell.
Until the euro zone finds a way out of its sovereign crisis, the risk of a 2008 moment remains real.
So much for that reassuring headline.

Maybe this will finally discredit these ratings agencies once and for all. Standard & Poor need to go the way of Arthur Andersen, back when collusion and willful incompetence in fiduciary matters had some consequences.
#1 Posted by James, CJR on Fri 5 Aug 2011 at 09:02 PM
I hate to say I told you so, well not really, but I called this. Congress proved that the government is dysfunctional and are willing to destroy the US economy just for their partisan idealogy. I wouldn't lend us money either after a stunt like that.
POLL: Who is more to blame for the US credit downgrade, congress or Obama?
Vote: http://www.wepolls.com/p/1716663
#2 Posted by Zadoc Paet, CJR on Fri 5 Aug 2011 at 09:55 PM
Perhaps we can have a moment of silence for ambiguity:
Toronto Star: Phone-hacking scandal spreads to the paper that broke the story
Lesley Ciarula Taylor Published On Fri Aug 05 2011 [...]
[Guardian investigative editor David Leigh admitted to “a voyeuristic thrill in hearing another person’s private messages” as he described using “some of those questionable methods myself over the years.”
Leigh’s disclosures came in a 2006 article after an editor at the tabloid News of the World was arrested. The piece was dug up and republished by Metro UK on Friday. [...]
Leigh is on holiday until Aug. 22 and did not reply to text messages. The Guardian expanded on its statement in an email to the Star, saying:
“This is not a new story. It is based on a 5-year-old article written by David Leigh. He has never attempted to conceal it or cover it up.”]
Meanwhile, in Washington another powerful symbol of bad fundamentals:
Washington Post Co. earnings drop 50 percent By Debbi Wilgoren, Friday, August 5, 6:33 AM Washington Post
[The Washington Post Co. on Friday reported a 50 percent drop in second-quarter earnings, with revenue continuing to fall in the Kaplan Higher Education unit and both the online and print operations of the newspaper division experiencing declines in advertising revenue.]
That the federal government is putting controls on Kaplan is a good sign. However, that a formerly great newspaper would be involved with a predator such as Kaplan is not a good sign at all.
S&P is right to crack down. If the political parties refuse to read the message, there will be more pain.
#3 Posted by Clayton Burns, CJR on Fri 5 Aug 2011 at 10:10 PM
Watch...it'll be all out bedlam, and 3rd world status, blood and guts in the streets, and the general media will still be calling this all a "double-dip recession!" HAHAHA Anyone who listens to the Alex Jones show has known this was coming for a looooong time! It's only establishment/mainstream media brainwashed idiots that still buy the "double dip recession" garbage that they've been feeding the sheeple for months and months that didn't know anything was coming, whatsoever!
#4 Posted by celebs4truth.com, CJR on Fri 5 Aug 2011 at 11:41 PM
It's a good thing you don't have to write a test to post at this site.
Look under your bed HAHAHA, because the New World Order zombie-slaves are coming to get you.
This is proof that American education is of high quality.
#5 Posted by Clayton Burns, CJR on Fri 5 Aug 2011 at 11:57 PM
Standard & Poor’s has been wrong before. But they’re right now.
(Ezra Klein-Washington Post site today).
Obama has not come back with a powerful reinforcement this morning of the $2 trillion error narrative. He is going to be overtaken by the Chinese narrative of US debt addiction. And rightly so. (If Obama is convinced that S&P has bungled it, then he can test his assertions in court).
The way I read it, it's too late anyway. S&P has captured the story line by making the appropriate decision. Despite the extensive coverage internationally of the Washington dysfunction factor, there has been a lack of depth in the coverage.
How is it going to be possible to alleviate the collapse of political discourse in the US without facing the reality of the obsolescence in the 4000+ colleges and universities of America? Why do we have the ludicrous admissions practices? Why can't Harvard students read?
Historically, why has Kaplan been able to get so much traction in the United States? I have yet to see a single sound comment explaining how American political dysfunction is rooted in abysmal habits in education.
Perhaps we should hand the country over to ALEX JONES MANIAC.
#6 Posted by Clayton Burns, CJR on Sat 6 Aug 2011 at 12:25 PM
Failed Ivy League Rhetoric Department:
[Economics and Politics by Paul Krugman - The Conscience of a ...
krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/ - Cached
The New York Times' Paul Krugman, Nobel Prize winner, blogs about economics and politics.
August 6, 2011, 10:00 AM
The Best Summary of the S&P Downgrade
Atrios:
Apparently we’re supposed to care about what some idiots at some corrupt organization think about anything.]
It is worth consulting The WSJ today on the failed rhetoric of the President as well. The Ivy League presidents should audit their practices starting in September. There clearly should be a national curriculum for admissions to colleges: in good bookstores, you will find excellent sections in history and political science.
A live curriculum, including a deep international media reading cycle, would be far better than AP or IB. Practices in English are just pathetic. (SAT, anyone?) Little wonder that the "rhetoric" is so shabby.
#7 Posted by Clayton Burns, CJR on Sat 6 Aug 2011 at 11:18 PM
Felix Salmon's analysis is timely and excellent:
FELIX SALMON IS A REUTERS BLOGGER.
The credibility and integrity of S&P’s ratings action
Felix Salmon AUG 6, 2011 19:33 EDT SOVEREIGN DEBT
[Treasury’s official response to the S&P downgrade has arrived, and it makes for pretty depressing reading. Treasury’s taking a shoot-the-messenger approach: S&P made a mistake in its debt-sustainability calculations, they say, and therefore “the credibility and integrity of S&P’s ratings action” must be called into question.
Paul Krugman takes a similar tack... [...]
Any student of sovereign default knows that it is born of precisely the kind of failures of governance that we saw during the debt-ceiling debate. That is why the US cannot hold a triple-A rating from S&P: the chance of having a dysfunctional Congress in future is 100%, and a dysfunctional Congress, armed with a statutory debt ceiling, is an extremely dangerous thing, and very far from risk-free.]
#8 Posted by Clayton Burns, CJR on Sun 7 Aug 2011 at 12:40 AM
Clayton wrote: "How is it going to be possible to alleviate the collapse of political discourse in the US without facing the reality of the obsolescence in the 4000+ colleges and universities of America? Why do we have the ludicrous admissions practices? Why can't Harvard students read?"
padikiller responds: Because liberals run the schools.
#9 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Sun 7 Aug 2011 at 01:01 PM
"Can anyone tell me a major thing Krugman has been wrong on in the last three or four years?"
You're joking, right? Try reading outside the govt-approved elitists. There are entire websites devoted to exposing the epic fails of Krugman and other Keynesian witch doctors. Of course, even when Krugman is sadly wrong, he is "right"; which is just about always. And then there are these, e.g.:
google.com/#sclient=psy&hl=en&safe=off&source=hp&q=site:mises.org+krugman+wrong&pbx=1&oq=site:mises.org+krugman+wrong&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=1618l8996l0l9826l28l24l0l0l0l0l384l2733l14.8.1.1l24l0&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=661c0b1152c259b4&biw=1024&bih=645
Through all the disingenuous govt statistics, circular logic, and smart-sounding yet purposely over-complicated mathematics, Keynesian policy advice basically comes down to: print, spend, borrow, spend, tax, spend, repeat. But oh, they are always right! You see, the govt simply hasn't done enough of their brilliant advice! (Sigh.)
#10 Posted by Dan A. , CJR on Sun 7 Aug 2011 at 02:51 PM
[Columbia University’s Graduate School of Journalism – the only journalism school in the Ivy League – provides journalists with a unique opportunity to hone and deepen their skills at any point in their careers.]
The website tells us that Columbia Journalism has to make urgent changes in leadership. Is there an independent and capable university rating agency in the US that could assess performance and link the bland live news blogs at The NYT and WSJ to this evident obsolescence at Columbia?
There is no such agency. We do not even have the cognitive capacity to imagine how such an agency would be formed and what it would do. There is no excuse for WSJ and NYT not following the Guardian and Telegraph models in live news blogs (today's WSJ live market blog has a little over 200 comments, whereas on some days the UK blogs would get thousands of comments).
The Telegraph is good at incorporating Twitter, but the WSJ (in this context) is not. A byproduct of these profiles is that there may be a lack of speed and focus in the coverage. What Columbia Journalism should do is offer to advise The NYT and WSJ. Urgently, the school could take on the case of The Washington Post, analyzing its wretched business practices and bad website design. A failing paper is no better than a failing state.
CJR has been far, far behind on the news cycle re S&P's "depredations." In America, there is tacit, Ivy League, gentlemanly acceptance of the obsolete. Columbia Journalism should partner with schools in Australia and the UK, to begin with, so as to dominate reading of international media cycles. Ameliorate, ameliorate.
#11 Posted by Clayton Burns, CJR on Mon 8 Aug 2011 at 11:46 AM
Five paragraphs to demand Twitter links on news sites?
#12 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Mon 8 Aug 2011 at 12:56 PM
What I teach students first is a rational e-mail address (no numbers). For example, ryan.chittum.cjr@gmail.com. Nicholas Lemann should step down, and Felix Salmon should take over as acting dean for eight months to see if he can do the job.
[Nicholas Lemann
Dean, and Henry R. Luce Professor of Journalism
nl2124@columbia.edu]
Salmon is good with information cycles: He managed to get into position and make intelligent comments on S&P at his blog.
What the federal government should do is ask Yale, Harvard, Princeton, and Columbia to engage in prototype audits of practices from this September to May, with participation by a new test-case academic ratings agency. (We need only search the names Juan Cole, Gaddafi, and Antonio Calvo to note some Ivy League administrative disarray).
#13 Posted by Clayton Burns, CJR on Mon 8 Aug 2011 at 01:04 PM