Lots of people are linking the Brokers With Hands On Their Faces Blog in the midst of the market turmoil of the last few days. It’s a nifty bit of media criticism.
My former colleague Elinore Longobardi wrote about the media’s penchantfor glum-trader pictures back in 2008:
Across the financial press, we see not only too many photos of stock traders but too many photos of the same traders.
And it’s not just a creativity problem, it’s an accuracy problem.
Presenting only the human face is misleading, obscuring how markets work nowadays, which is primarily by automation. It might be a bit more representative of reality to have a photo of a machine plugged into a wall in an air-conditioned server farm.
— Now it’s The New York Times perpetuating the two-crises meme.
I criticized a Wall Street Journal column the other day, and this is in the lead story on page one of the NYT:
Unlike the 2008 crisis, which began in the United States and spread worldwide after the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers and the near collapse of the giant insurer American International Group as subprime mortgage defaults surged, today’s situation began overseas. The mounting fear about European banks’ exposure to sovereign debt is now fraying nerves here.
Sorry, but this situation is a result of the 2008 crisis, and it began with the housing bubble and crash in the U.S. The resulting direct government spending and loss of revenues due to the financial industry-caused near-depression sent debt-to-GDP levels soaring in the U.S. and across Europe and resulted in the staggered economies we still have today.
This is all one long financial crisis.
— I wasn’t the only one baffled yesterday by that mess of a SmartMoney piece asserting that borrowers’ rates are going up in the wake of the downgrade. Kelly Evans and Evan Newmark of corporate cousin The Wall Street Journal were too:
Now that’s how you interview someone who’s not making sense. Excellent.
Ryan could check out the Roubini video interview at WSJ. At the 12th minute he discusses S&P's timing and "front-loaded fiscal austerity:"
[Economist Nouriel Roubini says the risk of a global recession is greater than 50 percent, and the next two to three months will reveal the economy's direction. In an interview with WSJ's Simon Constable, Roubini also says he's putting his money in cash. "This is not the time to be in risky assets," he says.]
WSJ video, btw, is amateurish. The site needs to bring in a new team on that.
By contrast, CNN WATCH IN OUR NEW CINEMATIC PLAYER is superior.
#1 Posted by Clayton Burns, CJR on Thu 11 Aug 2011 at 07:28 PM
Wow. Total amateur hour.The one reporter evidently just isn't real real bright, and neither is Trader Guy. This is the vaunted Wall Street Journal? Sheesh. You and Mr. Starkman must hide your face when someone notes that you used to work for this outfit, @Ryan.
I like the blog. Maybe they will do a sister blog about halo shots, another waaayyyyyy overused cliche by political photogs.
#2 Posted by James, CJR on Thu 11 Aug 2011 at 08:03 PM
"Sorry, but this situation is a result of the 2008 crisis..."
Nice Jedi mind trick, Ryan: just like that the entire last 12 months' worth of news from Europe's overburdened welfare states vanishes with out a trace. Greece? The other PIIGS? They never happened.
These are not the droids you are seeking...
#3 Posted by JLD, CJR on Thu 11 Aug 2011 at 10:47 PM
Roubini: Karl Marx Was Right (WSJ's The Big Interview). Front and center today on the WSJ website.
A mild ideological transformation at The Wall Street Journal.
#4 Posted by Clayton Burns, CJR on Fri 12 Aug 2011 at 11:28 AM
The Roubini interview is good; Simon Constable does a good job. The self-destruction discussion starts around 5 mins in:
http://professional.wsj.com/video/roubini-warns-of-global-recession-risk/C036B113-6D5F-4524-A5AF-DF2F3E2F8735.html?mg=reno-secaucus-wsj
#5 Posted by Dean Starkman, CJR on Fri 12 Aug 2011 at 03:07 PM
Dean: Thanks for your comment. There is a nice text: Capital: An Abridged Edition (Oxford World's Classics) [Kindle Edition] Karl Marx (Author), David McLellan (Editor).
Columbia, Yale, Harvard, and Princeton this year should switch to live curricula in politics and economics. That is, as soon as we see the opening--the interest in Marx here--we charge into it. (A good example of a somewhat stale canned curriculum is that for the Yale Grand Strategy program).
The WSJ Opinion today "S&P and the 'Regulator's Dilemma'" is intriguing. It would be valuable to have a CJR article on the Harvard, Oxford, Cambridge etc analysis, the basis of WSJ's Review & Outlook.
#6 Posted by Clayton Burns, CJR on Fri 12 Aug 2011 at 04:49 PM
I don't think a photographer would even consider shooting a machine. It may not be truly representative, but it is the HUMAN face of the day.
#7 Posted by Pat, CJR on Fri 12 Aug 2011 at 06:50 PM