Back in February, The Wall Street Journal’s Jim Browning looked at how the Boomers are the first generation to retire after the move by companies from defined-benefit pensions to defined-contribution 401(k)s, which looks to be a bust of historic proportions. The average 60 to 62 year old with a 401(k) has less than one-quarter the assets needed to fund retirement, while the near-retired with pensions are doing much better:
In September, he wrote about how the housing bust has left Boomers with five times the mortgage debt their parents had when they hit retirement age in the 1980s.
Today, Browning and the WSJ gives us their third Boomerpocalypse page-one story this year, looking at how the Great Recession has left a huge number of near-retirement-age Boomers unemployed or underemployed, making their retirement crisis that much more acute.
The older Boomer (55-64) unemployment rate is 6.5 percent, but when you count part-time workers who can’t get full-time jobs, as well as people who have given up looking for work and don’t get recorded in headline unemployment statistics, you get a much uglier 17.4 percent. But while significantly fewer older Americans are jobless than the rest of the population, the ones that do lose their jobs have a much harder time getting new ones. Browning notes that more than half of over-55 unemployed have been out of work for more than two years, compared to less than a third for everybody else. When they do find work, the vast majority take a pay cut.
Browning gives the story color by finding several excellent anecdotes. You’d think someone like Deborah Kallick, for instance, would be able to find work. She’s got a Ph.D., was a professor of biomedical research at the University of Minnesota, and worked in private-sector genome research. But here she is:
She has run out of unemployment insurance, used up most of her retirement savings and is indebted to relatives and credit-card companies…
A good job could settle her accounts, she said. Until then, Ms. Kallick relies on generosity, occasional consulting work and the sale of sweaters, purses and other possessions on eBay.
The second anecdote vividly portrays the straits Boomers find themselves—or will find themselves—in when they retire. Here’s a woman who relies on Social Security for most of her income:
“If I don’t buy a lot of groceries, then I am OK,” said Ms. Paladie, who is divorced. “I do a lot of puzzles sitting here and watching TV. And I play with my bird. And that’s about it.”
She rarely goes out, she said, “but I’ve got a clean house.” To save money, she sometimes eats Frosted Flakes for dinner. She shares them with her African Grey parrot, Muffin, who also likes the sweetened cereal.
Ms. Paladie hasn’t been to the doctor for five years, she said. She frets about paying rent after her unemployment benefits run out next year. Her daughter lives nearby but doesn’t have the room for her, Ms. Paladie said.
I also like how the Journal points out that these problems aren’t just a result of recent events. They’ve been building for years, a consequence in large part of chronically stagnating incomes. The financial crisis and deep recession have just made them much, much worse.


Incomes stagnated but benefits plummeted--for most people employed in the private sector. Govt. workers got by with raises and most benefits in tact, and those bennies, particularly medical and pension, turned out to be key.
Now comes phase II: Blame the government workers, since they have a few more crumbs than me.
Meanwhile, unexplored so far by social scientists, economists and journalists is the extraordinary rise of predatory and bogus get-rich-quick schemes that has taken the place of financial planning and/or defined benefit pensions over the past generation. The degree to which the recent housing bust was driven by desperate would-be house flippers with no other chance at a comfortable retirement would be interesting to know.
#1 Posted by Edward Ericson Jr., CJR on Mon 19 Dec 2011 at 09:37 PM
And here's how the housing bust affects folks when they need to sell their homes to finance senior living arrangements.
http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/Stories/2011/August/22/housing-crash-assisted-living.aspx
#2 Posted by Harris Meyer, CJR on Tue 20 Dec 2011 at 02:28 PM
Wait, I thought the average retiree had ONE MILLION DOLLARS *pinkie finger touches mouth* to blow on their retirements.
Don't tell me all of that was a lie now.
#3 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Tue 20 Dec 2011 at 04:09 PM
As I have said in the past Ellen Schultz is the go to read on today's retirement crisii.
"Schultz knows better from her extensive research. She is a reporter who has become an expert in a relatively narrow subject matter. As she writes, "What Immelt didn't mention was that, far from being a burden, GE's pension and retiree plans had contributed billions of dollars to the company's bottom line over the past decade and a half, and were responsible for a chunk of the earnings that the executives had taken credit for. Nor were these retirement programs — even with GE's 230,000 retirees — bleeding the company of cash. In fact, GE hadn't contributed a cent to the workers' pension plans since 1987 but still had enough money to cover all the current and future retirees."
Then Schultz delivers the clincher: GE was indeed burdened by a pension plan — the plan for top executives. The obligations of that plan, for a minuscule number of individuals compared with the 230,000 lower-level retirees, totaled $4.4 billion and had drained about $573 million from the corporate treasury over the past three years."
Employee pensions have been plundered to pay executive pensions, shareholder dividends, and executive bonuses (vis a vis the spiking of the share price).
#4 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Tue 20 Dec 2011 at 04:23 PM
And in the meantime, these scumbags are whining about how we've demonized them.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-12-20/bankers-join-billionaires-to-debunk-imbecile-attack-on-top-1-.html
You're lucky that the ows hasn't crashed your offices with pitchforks and bats. Why don't you take your "winnings" and be gracious about it?
#5 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Tue 20 Dec 2011 at 04:28 PM
After reading this summary, I am reminded of a cartoon that said it all.
In the study about how to motivate workers,titled appropirately, "The Great Jackass Fallacy", the cover shows a man with the head of a jackass pulling a cart in pursuit of a carot. Because he is a jackass, he doesn't realize he will never get the carot. Just mediate on the cartoon, and then read the article. Draw your conclusions accordingly.
#6 Posted by David Reno, CJR on Tue 3 Jan 2012 at 02:02 PM