As the economist Milton Friedman once said, “The business of business is to make money.” True enough, but it is also true that as long as there are governments that regulate, there will be businesses whose business is to grease the levers of power in hopes of scoring exemptions.
Given this, it’s too bad that the financial media often neglects the politics behind business, providing us with only the occasional quotes of some politicians’ meaningless sound bite. As the political fallout from rising gas prices continues to grow, rare is the column or news report that does much more than recount a political press conference held in front of a gas station, or blandly recite the various proposals floated by Congressmen playing to their television audiences.
The events behind these photo ops are infinitely more interesting and complicated, as evidenced by a piece in the latest issue of the New Republic. Reporter Michael Crowley examines the case of Texas Representative and House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Joe Barton, who has placed himself at the center of the public controversy over $3 a gallon gas prices and accusations of price gouging by the oil companies.
It’s a commonplace of American political life that whenever people become concerned over gas prices, Congress drags oil industry execs before the cameras and slaps them around a bit. But there’s a new sheriff in town, and as head of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, Barton is refusing to bring the bigwigs in. “We’re talking to them privately now,” he recently said, “And I haven’t definitely determined that we’re going to bring them up in public as a group.”
Barton has long been a friend of the energy industry, and a recipient of its generous campaign contributions. In July 2005, Crowley reports, he helped write an energy bill that granted $14.5 billion in tax breaks to producers.
During his tenure in Congress, Barton has also been responsible for “electricity deregulation (a boon for the likes of Enron) and opposing price controls during the recent California power crisis. Perhaps not coincidentally, he also began raking in campaign cash from industries like oil, gas, coal, and electric utilities—nearly $2 million since 1997,” according to Crowley.
But Barton’s ties to the energy industry go even deeper. Crowley notes that in May 2002, Tom DeLay’s daughter Danielle held her baby shower at the Washington offices of Reliant Energy, a Houston-based power company. “The shower’s organizer was Debra Whiddon, a friend of Barton’s from Texas whom Reliant hired into a lucrative lobbying job at the representative’s suggestion…Shortly after becoming chairman, Barton hired Reliant’s top Washington lobbyist to be the Energy and Commerce Committee’s chief of staff. As of last August, Barton held around $15,000 in Reliant stock. And, since 2001, Reliant has donated nearly $50,000 to Barton’s political accounts. Perhaps not coincidentally, Barton took care to kill a Senate-passed provision in last year’s energy bill that Reliant adamantly opposed, according to The Wall Street Journal.”
Now, the current crisis over high gas prices has many causes, from increased demand from India and China, to the maxing of global pumping capacity and continuing instability in Africa and the Middle East. But there dimensions to the problem that we are missing, and cases like Barton’s show that there is a lot more going on in Washington, DC, than immediately meets the eye.
And that seems to call for reporters to start asking questions worthy of deeper contemplation. Yet, reporters continue to ignore the political side of the equation. Just today, for example, we see the USA Today’s Matt Krantz take an otherwise long, hard look at gas prices without mention of the goings-on in Washington.
We don’t mean to single out Krantz. He is hardly the only business writer to shy away from the murkier realm of politics. Which is too bad, because the real world is not divided into Section A and Section C.

Fox Leads the Way in Mixing Politics and Finances the Irresponsible GOP Propaganda Way
"He is hardly the only business writer to shy away from the murkier realm of politics."
There is at least one groupp of so called business news shows that doesnt shy from mixing politics and financial news, too bad its unbelievably shoddy propaganda at Fox "News".
Fox News’ The Dow was down 120 points today, prompting Fox News’ David Ruder to suggest it was because USA Today made “the country less safe” by running its story on NSA’s data mining. But Fox News host Brenda Butler disagreed, saying that Wall Street would “not going to let some puny, little traitor, some leaker who went ahead and compromised our national security, take down this, take down our market, take down our country.” http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/12/fox-nsa-traitor/Fox's Neil Cavuto purports to cover Business and politics
"Collecting our phone records sure beats collecting our remains" and they round out the coverage of the NSA Fallout in his "CEO interview" segment where he inteviewed a GOP Sentator instead: "Do national security leaks make U.S. less safe? Sen. Kyl weighs in" "NEIL CAVUTO, HOST: An unhappy President Bush setting the record straight, after another national security leak makes the morning papers, saying that the NSA data collection is legal and today's headlines make us all a little less safe." http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,195276,00.html
I have trouble imagining a TV station run directly out of RNC Headquarters handling the issue much difference than Fox. I dont happen to watch Fox much, is it always so unbelievably slanted?
Posted by Catch22 on Fri 12 May 2006 at 11:24 PM
Yes, it is.
Posted by Jim3K on Thu 18 May 2006 at 04:08 AM