This excellent Daily Beast piece by Gary Rivlin catalogs the major crimes of the four biggest U.S. banks plus Goldman Sachs, a feat so daunting that the story runs more than 4,000 words on five pages—and there’s not much filler here.
It’s a portrait of a rogue industry, one that’s enriched itself (actually, further enriched. It was already wealthy) at the expense of the poor and middle class.
Rivlin is an authority on this, having worked the poverty-business beat and written the book Broke USA: From Pawnshops to Poverty, Inc. How the Working Poor Became Big Business.
Here’s Rivlin’s list of crimes and sins just from JPMorgan Chase: Rigging municipal bond auctions, bribing Jefferson County, Alabama, officials to do a bond deal that nearly destroyed the county, financed check cashers and payday lenders, directly and indirectly inflated the subprime housing bubble, screwed clients on Abacus-like CDO deals, overcharged mortgage bills to 10,000 military families, got tangled up with Bernie Madoff, etc.
And that’s just the last few years, folks.
Subprime Citigroup comes in for a much-deserved (and rarely given) smacking too:
It’s hard to overstate the destructiveness of Weill’s greed. By the time he made his play for Citi, Weill had already swallowed up Travelers Insurance, Smith Barney, and Salomon Brothers. Except a Depression-era law, the Glass-Steagall Act, dictated that banks, with their federally insured deposits, couldn’t take over insurance companies or Wall Street investment houses. But Weill put together this behemoth anyway and went about masterminding the repeal of Glass-Steagall, which happened in 1999.The repeal of Glass-Steagall set the stage for the financial meltdown that would follow years later. The rationale for Glass-Steagall was never more clear than in the final months of 2008, when federal officials faced the potential for widespread bank failure largely because of the great risks taken by its investment-banking arms.
Yet the pain Weill inflicted on the world didn’t end with the role he played in the repeal of Glass-Steagall. There was Citi’s takeover in 2000 of The Associates, a subprime-mortgage lender widely considered the industry’s most predatory. Two years later, Citigroup paid a then-record $215 million to settle charges leveled by the FTC that The Associates, renamed CitiFinancial, used deception to convince customers to refinance at usurious interest rates—and agreed to reform its ways. Still, the company would set another record when in 2004 it paid the Federal Reserve $70 million (without admitting its guilt) to resolve new charges against CitiFinancial. But what did a few hundred million dollars in settlements matter when compared to the tens of billions of profits Citi was reaping? A top-five subprime lender, Citi made $38 billion in subprime home loans in 2006 alone, a year in which the bank reported $28 billion in profits.
What’s particularly valuable about this piece is that it puts collects most of the big misdeeds in one place (money laundering for dictators and druglords, like at Wells Fargo, doesn’t make the list, unfortunately, but hey, Rivlin only had so much space). Find me one other story about JP Morgan, for instance, that included this entire list of sins.
Day-to-day news coverage usually fails to put stories on new settlements or investigations in the context of the broad sweep of the banks’ past behavior. When you see it all in one place, the pattern of misconduct is much clearer.
Remember this story when writing about the banks’ next settlement. And they’re always settlements.

And complicit in every one of these so-called "crimes" were government corrupt officials..
Nonetheless, the commie/liberal solution to the perceived "Wall Street" problem is more and bigger government.
So silly.
#1 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Thu 27 Oct 2011 at 10:14 PM
Matt Taibbi did a similar (and readable) catalog of the banker's system:
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taibblog/owss-beef-wall-street-isnt-winning-its-cheating-20111025
"Can anyone imagine a common thief being caught by police and sentenced to pay back half of what he took? Just one low-ranking individual in that case was charged (case pending), and no individual had to reach into his pocket to help cover the fine. The settlement Goldman paid to to the government was about 1/24th of what Goldman received from the government just in the AIG bailout. And that was the toughest "punishment" the government dished out to a bank in the wake of 2008.
The point being: we have a massive police force in America that outside of lower Manhattan prosecutes crime and imprisons citizens with record-setting, factory-level efficiency, eclipsing the incarceration rates of most of history's more notorious police states and communist countries.
But the bankers on Wall Street don't live in that heavily-policed country. There are maybe 1000 SEC agents policing that sector of the economy, plus a handful of FBI agents. There are nearly that many police officers stationed around the polite crowd at Zucotti park.
These inequities are what drive the OWS protests. People don't want handouts. It's not a class uprising and they don't want civil war -- they want just the opposite. They want everyone to live in the same country, and live by the same rules. It's amazing that some people think that that's asking a lot."
#2 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Fri 28 Oct 2011 at 05:14 PM
"And complicit in every one of these so-called "crimes" were government corrupt officials.."
Let's take just one item on the list... JPMorgan Chase admitting that its document processors didn't have personal knowledge about the documents they swore they'd personally evaluated.
Please list the government employees complicit in this act along with any evidence that demonstrates corruption on their part.
Oh wait, you can't... can you?
#3 Posted by Frekas, CJR on Mon 31 Oct 2011 at 11:12 AM
Frekas asked: "Let's take just one item on the list... JPMorgan Chase admitting that its document processors didn't have personal knowledge about the documents they swore they'd personally evaluated."
padikiller replies: Ask and ye shall receive...
http://www.thestreet.com/story/11267496/1/housing-regulator-falls-short-on-robo-signing.html
#4 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Mon 31 Oct 2011 at 04:08 PM
Nice try, pads, but I see nothing in there about corrupt government officials enabling JPMorgan to submit fraudulent affidavits to foreclosure.
Having not received, I ask again...
#5 Posted by Freskas, CJR on Mon 31 Oct 2011 at 05:26 PM
I guess you missed this:
"The Inspector General... ...identified instances where Freddie Mac terminated for poor performance law firms that processed foreclosures on its behalf, but Fannie Mae continued to use the firms."
Regulators asleep at the switch. And nobody held accountable for it.
It's the government way.
#6 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Mon 31 Oct 2011 at 06:14 PM
He's right. Under conservatives, regulators and law enforcement are asleep at the wheel, as are private ratings agencies, the banks' own risk assessors/underwriters, and the executives who are compensated based on their responsibility for the "profits" - but never for the losses. Anything less would be communism.
#7 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Mon 31 Oct 2011 at 06:39 PM
No Pads, I was asking for you to list the government employees who were complicit in JPMorgan's fraudulent affidavits.
As in helped them commit fraud.
You said the government was complicit in all of them. Well, I see nothing specific to what I'd asked about - JPMorgan's fraud.
So go ahead. Anytime.
(Also, "No one held accountable...the government way." That's rich, coming from the guy who whines about government regulation as too costly... Do you even have a point of view?)
#8 Posted by Freskas, CJR on Mon 31 Oct 2011 at 07:56 PM
"[T]here were indicators prior to August 2010 that could have led FHFA to identify the heightened risk posed by foreclosure processing within Fannie Mae’s RAN. These indicators included significant increases in foreclosures, which accompanied the deterioration of the housing market; consumer complaints alleging improper foreclosures; contemporaneous media reports about foreclosure abuses by Fannie Mae’s law firms; and public court filings in Florida and elsewhere highlighting such abuses."
http://www.fhfaoig.gov/Content/Files/AUD-2011-004.pdf
Read the report. The GSE's were on notice as early as 2005 that fraudulent/deficient foreclosures were occurring, yet the regulators did.... Nothing...
Just as the SEC did nothing about Bernie Madoff for nearly 10 years after they were presented proof positive of his Ponzi scheme.
Regulation doesn't work, fellas. This is just the way it is.
It is indeed the government way... Regulators asleep at the switch, and nobody held accountable.
#9 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Mon 31 Oct 2011 at 09:11 PM
Once again, I asked you about the government aiding in JPMorgan's fraud, as you broadly asserted in your first post.
and once again you come back with stuff about the GSEs.
Look, if your point is that there are people in GSE that should go to prison, cool. So long as the crooks in firms like JPMogan share a cell with them.
But your first point is getting increasingly murky.
They're "so-called crimes" according to you - but the Government did them too.
So, to you they're okay? But they should have been punished?
And government is bad because they don't enforce regulations that are also bad?
Look over there... it's Madoff!
Yeah, whatever - but you still can't back up government involvement in JPMorgan's fraud, and your position on regulation makes absolutely no sense.
#10 Posted by Freskas, CJR on Mon 31 Oct 2011 at 09:31 PM
@Freskas:
I have made it abundantly clear that anyone who committed fraud should be prosecuted. PERIOD.
I'm not excusing fraud. Anyone who signed a false affidavit should be tried.
However, GSE's controlled HALF of all mortgages and GSE regulators were on notice SIX YEARS AGO that foreclosure fraud was occurring and did NOTHING. Had they done their jobs, the fraud would have been mitigated, if not prevented.
Government regulation simply doesn't work. It just doesn't.
#11 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Tue 1 Nov 2011 at 05:48 PM
Investing in payday lenders is hardly a crime. Though many people find their practices disagreeable, these are legal (and growing) businesses, and citing their fiscal support as a crime only detracts from the bona-fide criminal acts of bribery, fraud and racketeering. Rhetoric has no place in our quest for economic justice.
#12 Posted by liberalelite, CJR on Wed 9 Nov 2011 at 02:11 PM