Secondly, use links as shorthand. Kouwe and Lehrer were both brought down by the fact that they felt the need to re-write what had already been written elsewhere. On the web, you never need to do that. If you or someone else has already written something well, just link to that, rather than feeling the need to repeat it.
Thirdly, use the blog to interact with your peers, rather than just primary sources. There are hundreds of great science and ideas blogs out there already; start reading them, and be generous about linking to them. Your readers will thank you. When you see an article you wish you’d written, link to it and say so. When someone finds a fantastic paper and writes it up in a slightly incomplete way, credit them with the great find, and then fill in the blanks. When two or three people are all talking about the same thing, sum up what the debate is, and explain where you stand.
Fourthly, iterate. Lehrer is a big-name journalist at a major publication: when he writes stuff, people respond, often on their own blogs, and often with very keen intelligence. Link to those people, learn from them, converse with them via the medium of blog, and use that collaboration and conversation to hone and further develop your own ideas. Treat every blog post as the beginning of a process, rather than as the end of one.
As the editors of the American Chemical Society write, self-plagiarising is fraud, because it is “an intentional attempt to deceive a reader by implying that new information is being presented”. A blogger should never feel the need to do that, because blogging is not at heart about delivering new information, so much as it is about finding and linking and connecting and conversing. Once you internalize that, self-plagiarism becomes a non-issue.

I've noticed that different media organizations have different expectations/standards for their blogs. When the New Yorker asks for a blog entry, are they asking for an opinion/personal interest piece, or are they asking for a mini-article?
#1 Posted by J Meeks, CJR on Wed 20 Jun 2012 at 04:25 PM
Nicely done. I am not really sure what to think of this whole "scandal" but after reading this, I am one step closer. It certainly doesn't fall as low as the Carl Safina plagiarism thing you guys covered, but it doesn't taste right. Felix, you nailed it.
#2 Posted by erikvance, CJR on Wed 20 Jun 2012 at 07:12 PM
I haven't paid any attention to this, and can't imagine why anyone else is. But it sounds like if anything, Lehrer should be applauded for actually trying to develop coherent essays, rather than just tossing off fragmentary, random reactions to other people's work, as seems to be the usual approach of bloggers.
#3 Posted by Robert Harris, CJR on Thu 21 Jun 2012 at 07:09 PM
Isn't the whole point honesty and transparency? He didn't attribute the source of his posts (himself, therefore the self-plagiarization)nor disclose it readers or to The New Yorker. The magazine has had to add Editor's notes to at least 5 of his posts saying, in part, "We regret the duplication of material." The victim here is credibility.
#4 Posted by Jeff Domansky, CJR on Sat 23 Jun 2012 at 06:27 PM
When it's a Columbia grad, we don't call it "self-plagiarism"...
We call it "reiterative publication".
And count me among those who doesn't think the guy did anything wrong, ethically speaking.
Indeed, "self-plagiarism" is an oxymoron.
Sloppy and lazy? Sure.
Crooked? No way.
#5 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Sat 23 Jun 2012 at 07:53 PM
Firstly, think of it as reading, rather than writing. Lehrer is a wide-ranging polymath: he is sent, and stumbles across, all manner of interesting things every day. Right now, I suspect, he files those things away somewhere and wonders whether one day he might be able to use them for another Big Idea piece. Make the blog the place where you file them away. Those posts can be much shorter than the things Lehrer’s writing right now: basically, just an excited “hey look at this”, with maybe a short description of why it’s interesting. It’s OK if the meat of what you’re blogging is elsewhere, rather than on your own blog. In fact, that’s kind of the whole point.
5d theatre
#6 Posted by 5d theatre, CJR on Tue 3 Jul 2012 at 03:00 AM