It’s worth emphasizing that all of these funds were paid to Goodman between April 2007 and December 2007. Goodman’s damning letter to Les Hinton et al was sent on March 2, 2007—one month before the payments began. Here’s a quote from that letter: “Tom Crone and the Editor promised on many occasions that I could come back to a job at the newspaper if I did not implicate the paper or any of its staff in my mitigation plea.”
Hinton testified to Parliament on March 6, 2007, just four days after receiving the letter from Goodman, which presumably would make it difficult to use the “I don’t recall” defense. The Guardian:
Four days after Goodman sent his letter, Hinton gave evidence to the select committee in which he made no reference to any of the allegations contained in the letter, but told MPs: “I believe absolutely that Andy [Coulson] did not have knowledge of what was going on”. He added that he had carried out a full, rigorous internal inquiry and that he believed Goodman was the only person involved.
Hinton is now likely to have be called before Parliament again, as is James Murdoch.
I’ll leave the kicker to Brian Cathcart in The Guardian:
Tom Watson MP said the new material was devastating and he was not exaggerating. Difficult though it may be to believe, documents released by the Commons culture, media and sport select committee are at least as damaging to News International management as the revelation last month that Milly Dowler’s voicemail had been hacked. That news prompted disgrace and resignations: now we are looking at possible criminal charges at senior levels.
Assuming that these documents hold up to scrutiny, a whole raft of executives - not journalists or editors, but well above that level - are surely likely to be questioned by police investigating the possibility of a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. Arrests in some cases must be likely…
James has been asked back to the media committee to clarify his evidence. That will be a humiliation so dreadful that he will be looking for any way he can to avoid it. Meanwhile a number of people accustomed to executive limos and seven-figure salaries are beginning to wonder what it might be like in jail.

Ryan: [News Corp. submitted it, redacting all the key information in the three paragraphs I just quoted.]
Murdoch says he's staying at News Corp. helm
He rejects speculation that Chief Operating Officer Chase Carey might take over. Fourth-quarter earnings are down 22% from a year earlier.
By Dawn C. Chmielewski, Los Angeles Times August 11, 2011
[To underscore that commitment, Murdoch said former Assistant Atty. Gen. Joel Klein, who joined News Corp. in November, would head an internal investigation. Klein will report directly to Viet Dinh and the other independent board members.]
What is most difficult to understand is why Joel Klein has not today severed his ties to News Corp. At some point, you have to see what the facts say and make a decision, or admit that what others saw as your integrity simply does not exist.
The Guardian and New York Times have failed to report the implications of Murdoch's hiring of Klein on the education front. All he is capable of doing is producing more mechanistic trash of the Kaplan type. He has not even been able to identify and promote some of the best education resources in the Murdoch empire, especially COBUILD. He just can't get it.
#1 Posted by Clayton Burns, CJR on Tue 16 Aug 2011 at 06:53 PM
I hope that The Guardian and The New York Times will not tire of continued investigation and reporting of this scandal. We as a society have a golden opportunity to restore journalism to its rightful place as a servant of democracy if only those who care will not grow weary. Best wishes to all who are leading the charge.
#2 Posted by Catherine Coy, CJR on Wed 17 Aug 2011 at 02:13 AM
I. for one, am shocked. I never thought they'd actually LIE.
#3 Posted by Edward Ericson Jr., CJR on Wed 17 Aug 2011 at 10:42 AM
I'm sure I'm not the only person who has been thinking how much this scandal, with Goodman being the only one so far to go to jail, resembles the Bush Administration Al Ghraib scandal. Then, too, only low-level people were punished, and the executives--Bush, Rumsfeld, et al.--went scot-free. If "a number of people accustomed to executive limos and seven-figure salaries" at News Corp. "are beginning to wonder what it might be like in jail," could that parallel ever play out further? Somehow, I doubt it.
#4 Posted by Barbara Selvin, CJR on Wed 17 Aug 2011 at 07:49 PM
Media News International 'did not order redaction of phone-hacking letter'
guardian.co.uk, 18 Aug 2011 James Robinson
Law firm writes to select committee chairman saying sections were removed not to cover up the truth, but on police advice. By James Robinson
… Goodman to News International was also sent by Harbottle & Lewis to the committee on Wednesday, but with the relevant passages still legible.That prompted claims News International was deliberately seeking to hide the true extent of phone…
#5 Posted by Clayton Burns, CJR on Fri 19 Aug 2011 at 01:24 PM
Phone hacking: News International lawyers admit redacting Clive Goodman letter
Lawyers for News International have admitted they redacted a letter submitted to MPs which implicated senior News of the World staff in phone hacking.
By Mark Hughes, Crime Correspondent 3:24PM BST 19 Aug 2011 Telegraph
#6 Posted by Clayton Burns, CJR on Fri 19 Aug 2011 at 03:45 PM