Since when has the Federal Reserve been an investigative pit bull?
Since never. But don’t look to the major papers for that context this morning in their reports on Chairman Bernanke’s toughish comments to Congress yesterday on Goldman Sachs and the Greek swaps scandal.
The closest you get from the The New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg, Financial Times, or Washington Post is this from the Post:
It was unusual for Bernanke to comment publicly on the Fed’s review of the actions of a bank under its supervision. That information is usually confidential, and it was unclear whether his comments were a slip of the tongue or meant more strategically to show that the Fed is being tough on Goldman and other Wall Street firms.
And none of the three mentions another critical piece of context: That the Fed is under the gun right now in Congress, which is threatening to take away significant parts of its powers. It’s pretty obvious to anyone that follows this stuff closely that Bernanke’s sudden muscle-flexing is an expediency. He’s trying to preserve his fiefdom from Chris Dodd and Co.
Don’t you think readers who don’t have time to follow financial news all day deserve to know that? A paragraph would have sufficed.



Recent Comments
-
Jon Ber on
Murdoch may sell his British papers
(2)
-
Dan A. on
Darts and Laurels
(2)
-
Clayton Burns on
That’s that, part one
(1)
-
Jonathan on
Dial back the outrage
(1)
-
AdamG on
David Simon, creator of The Wire and Treme, on the Times-Picayune cuts
(14)
-
Edward Ericson Jr. on
Sorkin's Glass-Steagall straw man
(3)
-
Thimbles on
Audit notes: Buffett on newspapers, Times-Picayune, SEC lets Lehman go
(2)
-
MikeJake on
Facebook fiasco
(3)
More