The Wall Street Journal, New York Times, and Financial Times lead their front pages with the Treasury Department’s “rescue plan” for mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac after a week in which their stocks were crushed.
The plan asks Congress to allow Treasury to “invest” billions of dollars in Fannie and Freddie stock and extend hundreds of billions of dollars in loans to them, the NYT reports. The Federal Reserve will extend its emergency lending to the two, as it did to Wall Street during the Bear Stearns crisis, until Congress enables the Treasury plan, expected as soon as late this week.
The NYT notes it’s the second time in four months the government has had to bail out a major financial company, these two have a hand in more than $5 trillion worth of mortgage debt. It says the “failure of just one of the companies could be catastrophic for economies around the world.”
The Journal doesn’t go as far, saying the Bush administration put a confidence-bolstering measure in place “without intervening directly” and hopes it don’t have to.
Sunday’s moves, by promising government funds to keep Fannie and Freddie operational, reinforce the notion that investors can count on the government to bail them out in a crisis. Until recently, that was an idea the Bush administration had tried hard to quash.
The NYT and Journal say that government officials were worried Freddie would have trouble raising debt in a previously scheduled auction Monday, something that would further rattle financial markets.
The Times in a C1 analysis writes that the government is the last lender standing in mortgages and student loans.
In short, in a nation that holds itself up as a citadel of free enterprise, the government has transformed from a reliable guarantor into effectively the only lender for millions of Americans engaged in the largest transactions of their lives.
Before, its more modest mission was to make more loans available at lower rates. Now it is to make sure loans are made at all. The government is setting the terms and the standards of Americans’ biggest loans.
Bad moon rising
The Journal on A1 and the Times on C1 write that more banks are likely to fail in the wake of the collapse of IndyMac, the mortgage lender/thrift seized by regulators Friday in the biggest bank failure in nearly a quarter century.
The Journal reports that some 37 percent of bank deposits are uninsured, having exceeded the limits insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. It says some are moving funds to banks they think are safer, raising worries about a “walk on the bank.” It says IndyMac customers could lose up to a billion dollars in uninsured deposits.
The FDIC says IndyMac’s failure, brought on by its overinvestment in “liar loans”—mortgages without income documentation—will probably be the most expensive in history, costing it up to $8 billion.
The Times says, as it and the Journal have been reporting for months, that this banking crisis won’t result in as many failures as the last one in the late 1980s, but that it could result in 150 failures.
The Securities and Exchange Commission said it will start cracking down on rumor-spreading on Wall Street, the Times and Journal report on C1. It will do so by looking at firms’ compliance programs, which sounds like a lot of bark and little bite.
Of course, those nasty short sellers are the ones in the crosshairs, not those who spread false positive rumors about a company’s health. The NYT:
Since the almost overnight collapse of Bear Stearns earlier this year, top-level Wall Street executives have been pleading with regulators to investigate what they see as efforts by short sellers to plant false information and profit from it.
Lehman Brothers, for example, faced rumors last week that two major clients had stopped doing business with the firm. Lehman’s stock dived almost 20 percent before recovering somewhat as both clients denied the rumors.