And quite frankly, the WSJ, which in a separate piece offered the prescient suggestion that Bank of America was the most suited to buy Merrill, doesn’t look as silly in hindsight as many of the other observers.
Like The Globe and Mail, which resurrects Thain’s Goldman Sachs nickname “Thain the Humane.”
BusinessWeek was one of several outlets that went with the Superman metaphor (because hey, when you’ve got a Clark Kent look alike, what else is there to do?). Meanwhile, the FT’s Lex column asks us: “Why is John Thain the right person to fix Merrill Lynch’s woes?” And then goes on to answer itself.
Anyhow, in the months after this initial flurry of excitement, reality did start to set in. But the problem is, the press had spent so much energy building Thain up that even in the face of his highly questionable performance, they made it hard for themselves to abruptly about-face.
And so Merrill Lynch’s performance got worse and worse under Thain, but he didn’t receive much blame for it until February 2009. The press’s enthusiasm for Thain did dim somewhat during his Merrill tenure, but any fair reading shows he got way too much slack for way too long.
Thain himself continued to be positive about Merrill’s outlook, for no obvious reason, beyond the fact that he headed the company—and, unfortunately for Bank of America shareholders and U.S. taxpayers, he was greeted with little skepticism. Sure Merrill wrote off $11.5 billion and reported a fourth quarter loss of almost $10 billion, but Thain still insisted, as Dow Jones reported, “the firm is in good shape after the writedowns.”
To give credit where it’s due, we note that a few pieces did a better-than-average job of diminishing Thain’s carefully crafted PR. But at the time, this kind of reasonable skepticism was clearly the exception. It didn’t generate real momentum.
Speaking of PR: Thain seems to have been on the interview circuit for a good part of the past year, and the misinformation campaign clearly had an impact in softening up the press. Having talked with the WSJ for an interview published January 18, 2008, Thain spoke with the FT February 1, where he merited the introduction of “Wall Street’s Mr. Fix-It.” The Sunday Times applied the same well-worn moniker in “‘Mr. Fix-It’ John Thain eases pain at Merrill Lynch,” an early March interview, as did Forbes in an early April profile that noted, among other things:
Apart from the subprime calamity, Merrill’s investment banking and institutional equity divisions had a good year…
We’re sure the accommodations were lovely on the Titanic. To speak of results at Merrill “apart from” subprime was ludicrous even at the time.
Audit Reader, this is why the hero narrative doesn’t work. The financial problems are systemic. No single person can come in and turn things around any more than any one executive, no matter how powerful, can turn millions of struggling subprime borrowers into prime ones. It just doesn’t work that way. And that goes double for someone like Thain, who either didn’t see or didn’t admit the depths of the crisis.
The fact is, Thain got away with saying a lot of things. In April, he was still pedaling the increasingly well-worn line that things at Merrill might be bad, but they would turn around.
At least one observer detected that even Thain now seemed to have less confidence in his words. But whether or not his own confidence was flagging, his reputation was still sufficiently intact that the WSJ led off a Heard on the Street segment with:
John Thain has done such a good job stabilizing Merrill Lynch & Co. that investors already are betting he can return the Wall Street firm to profitability and growth in the near future.
It is clear in hindsight that this evaluation was, um, misinformed. What’s more, it was pretty questionable at the time. But the WSJ insisted on spinning bad news positively. Job cuts? They “Show Thain Is Boss.” Sure, but maybe he cut the wrong jobs. Who knows?

So Bill and Hill run 170 metric tons of cocaine into mena arkansas over a five year period, kill Vincent Foster to cover up their gutting of madison guaranty savings and loan in 1995, and off she goes as Sec'y of State (I would probably be dead now if she had become president). See what's wrong with America?
#1 Posted by Lyle Courtsal, CJR on Fri 20 Feb 2009 at 12:12 AM
This is great stuff. How many Biz magazine covers wasted showing the latest master of the universe posing with his arms folded, blue shirt/white collar, standing to a globe? And at what ultimate cost?
#2 Posted by Steve Daley, CJR on Fri 20 Feb 2009 at 03:38 PM
Good piece. But dolly back a bit farther. There really are villains, with names like Rubin, Dodd, Gramm and--the mad preacher--Greenspan. The Thains of the world, the Paulsons, the Reeds and Weills and Jack Welch's all worshipped the same cult for 25 years before this latest crash. Their supplicants in the business press wrote the same crap stories through at least two previous busts. Hardly any of them ever asked what a "derivative" was.
#3 Posted by ed ericson, CJR on Sun 22 Feb 2009 at 10:41 AM
It seems that things are just the same over here in the UK as they are there, if Joe public was to act this way the would undoubtley be locked away.
Ergonomic office chairs
#4 Posted by Andrew Ferrar, CJR on Sat 25 Apr 2009 at 07:31 AM
An excellent piece that highlights society's obsession with the individual... Time to get up out of the office chair people and face the world we live in.
#5 Posted by H.Mueller, CJR on Fri 9 Sep 2011 at 06:16 AM