The Journal looks at how investments that were supposed to reduce risk by spreading it instead magnified it by spreading it to every corner of the globe, and this case to a town of 10,000 in Australia that has tens of millions in exposure to synthetic CDOs.
The linkage between Messrs. McCormack and Gahan demonstrates how far a vast superstructure of credit derivatives such as synthetic CDOs, built up over the past decade, has spread the risk of lending to U.S. companies — and how far the pain is likely to reach. They’re called derivatives in part because they don’t entail any direct investment into companies. Instead, they’re more like side bets on the companies’ fortunes.
JP Morgan, which created this particular CDO, brought in half a billion dollars in revenue in 2006 on the stuff, the paper reports.
Here’s a good explanation of what these complex things are and how they work:
Synthetic CDOs are vulnerable at this stage in the financial crisis, because of the way they work. They generate income by selling insurance against bond defaults, typically on a pool of 100 or more companies. One way they do so is by entering into contracts known as “credit-default swaps.” Investors, such as the town of Parkes, receive regular payments from credit-default-swap buyers, which are usually banks or hedge funds.In return for the income, investors agreed to make huge payments in what was seen as a highly unlikely event: a wave of corporate defaults greater than any experienced in the previous two decades. Now, though, as financial firms implode and a slump in consumer spending hits retailers and manufacturers, that event is starting to happen.
As a result, synthetic-CDO deals are poised to trigger a massive transfer of wealth from investors such as Parkes to hedge funds and the trading units of big U.S. investment banks. By various estimates, the amount of money set to change hands could be anywhere from tens of billions to hundreds of billions of dollars.
It’s not the most elegant story, but you try to write one on synthetic collateralized debt obligations.

So, a synthetic CDO is made up of Credit Default Swaps?
Is this always the case? or are there other types of synthetic CDOs that do not involve bond insurance/CDSs?
Posted by murph on Tue 23 Dec 2008 at 11:32 AM
Hi, Murph,
I think that's right that synthetic CDOs contain only credit derivatives.
Posted by Ryan Chittum on Tue 23 Dec 2008 at 05:40 PM
This touches on a compensation issue: "In return for the income, investors agreed to make huge payments in what was seen as a highly unlikely event: a wave of corporate defaults greater than any experienced in the previous two decades. Now, though, as financial firms implode and a slump in consumer spending hits retailers and manufacturers, that event is starting to happen."
The media has attacked bankers who made huge bonuses off deals that are now exploding. That doesn't necessarily mean they were bad deals. Let's say we're playing dice. If you say "I'll give you $0.50, but you need to pay me $1 if I roll a 6", I would be a fool not to offer you this "insurance."
Bankers are not owners. They are ultimately locking in a salary at the expense of passing up higher possible gains. Just ask John Paulson.
Posted by Chris Corliss on Tue 23 Dec 2008 at 07:21 PM
The real responsibility for Parkes stunning financial mess doesn't so much rest with Allen McCormack but with the town's immediate past mayor, Robert Wilson and the bunch of halfwit councillors who made up the town government 2004 through 2008. Wilson was mayor for twenty three years and became a quasi dictator toward the end of his time. Wilson made out he got a honorary PhD from Warnborough university in England what is a load of tosh. At the end he had to go because it was getting too hot for him. But look at the mess he left behind. He should be sued by the people for the loss and trouble him and his ego caused to Parkes. And most of the last council members should be done with him for going along with everything he put up without saying one word when some of them knew the facts and should have said 'no'. That doctor's wife is the worst because she is the smartest.
Posted by brian hyslop on Mon 29 Dec 2008 at 10:04 PM