“The Great Depression was a mass of policy errors that made it worse,” says historian and investment consultant Peter Bernstein, 90. “This time we have our fill of policy errors, but at least they’re not making it worse.”
So, at least so far our bumbling Bush/Obama, Pelosi/Boehner, Geithner, and Bernanke aren’t Hoover, Smoot/Hawley, Mellon, and Young. Comforting!
I also like that Lahart talks to some real old-timers who not only know what they’re talking about regarding the economy and history, but who actually lived through the Depression—including 84-year-old economist Robert Solow, 93-year-old economist Paul Samuelson, and 94-year-old economist Anna Schwartz. It’s a good tack.
The economy now has so-called automatic stabilizers, which not only protect people somewhat from the downturn, but which also help keep the economy moving.
And then there are the social-safety-net programs that emerged after the Great Depression to blunt the blows. “There were no unemployment insurance, no food stamps, none of the automatic things that maintain some income for people who are out of work,” says former Massachusetts Institute of Technology economist Robert Solow, a Nobel laureate.
And a good close:
As a University of Chicago student during the Depression, Mr. Samuelson remembers attending economic lectures that seemed completely out of step with the times, based on laissez-faire principles that stopped making sense after the 1929 crash. “I was perplexed because I could not reconcile the assignments I got from these great economists with what I heard out the windows and I heard from the street,” he says.
Starting in the 1980s, the U.S. saw an extraordinary period of economic quiescence, where growth was steady and policy makers dealt with financial crises handily. Economists began to doubt the possibility of a financial crisis so severe it would upend the economy. And that left them as blindsided as their counterparts when the crisis came 80 years ago.

Playing around with unemployment and other stats to distinguish between a recession and a depression seems a bit arbitrary to me. Recessions are fairly easy, as zero crossings are quite obvious, but exactly which other numbers might consitute crossing a new line into depression? Wouldn't that be merely opinion?
To my mind, of course we would need to see some fairly bad numbers, but more importantly we should also see a significant and systemic banking failure. This indeed crosses a new and easily identifiable line; that is, that traditional recovery tools no longer hold sway within the market.
As for the inability to compare unemployment (and other economic) numbers due to rule changes, check out John Williams' Shadow Stats web site. The guy makes a living undoing these rule changes and recalculating the results. And no, he doesn't come up with 8.1%.
#1 Posted by Benedict@Large, CJR on Tue 31 Mar 2009 at 01:15 AM
Skills. This is manifested in volleyball in the specific skills. Among the specific issues:
- Eye coordination and eye-cup antrebrat;
- Sense of ball and players;
- Ambidextrous;
- Reproductive capacity and management of movement
- Analytical motility (fingers, hands)
Conditions for specific skill education:
- Improving the volume ambidextriei reps with 25% higher
made by hand and foot awkwardly;
- Modification of natural skills;
- Dinpozitii practice and in ever changing conditions;
- Tactical action with pronounced (precision, anticipation)
- "Break" the typical stereotype of some specific skills.http://www.jocuri-logice.net - jocuri logice
Force. Educating the general force must always combined with the specific. Among the manifestations of the general workforce, mention absolute power and explosive
force. Volleyball players must be educated in the preparation of all types, but particularly explosive force, which is very important. Among specific forms of manifestation of
force, the most important is the expansion. Specific strength combined with speed is also manifest in other situations: change direction of travel, the travel stop and powerful attack.
Gonna write here until you answer me to tell me that's the reason why I'm banned I do not get on the chat on Thursday night and now it's Saturday. I want one explanation!
#2 Posted by FJKenneth, CJR on Tue 24 May 2011 at 01:05 PM