Most business investigations focus on corporations and investors. And for good reason: They’re the ones with the money and the power.
But sometimes a small business owner can have an outsized impact too. Here in Seattle three weeks ago, a boat moored off Whidbey Island caught fire and sank, spilling thousands of gallons of fuel, shutting down shellfish harvesting in the area, and costing the government millions of dollars.
It’s one of those stories that The Seattle Times could have covered with fill-in-the-blanks news pieces on the incident and just rewritten the authorities’ press releases on whether anyone was responsible.
Instead, the paper dug into the story, reporting on the owner of the decrepit boat—who turns out to be a sort of jackass of all trades. This is the kind of investigation metro journalists should be doing: It’s got local color, a good yarn, and accountability journalism all in one, and it’s on the news. Plus, the story actually has a voice.
See the top:
Rory Westmoreland is a tough man to track down.
When you do find him, though, you’ll likely hear about his string of “bad luck.” How he has to “work really hard just to get by.” How he is “not a wealthy person.” The story will unfold slowly, his deep drawl ambling along until he gets to the question at hand.
It’s about a boat. His boat. The rotting hulk that caught fire and sank in Penn Cove three weeks ago.
At first, he will complain about the government agencies dogging him, asking questions, assessing fines, even making accusations in the media. There’s the Coast Guard, the state departments of Ecology, Natural Resources, and Health…
The thing is, it wasn’t his fault, he says. Not his fault at all.
No newspaper-ese there.
It turns out that Westmoreland bought the 140-foot “rotting hulk” for $2,500 a while back and moored it in a cove sometime last year. You only get 30 days to moor in state waters, the Times says, but the boat sat there, racking up minor fines, for at least six months before it sunk.
All told, the agency says, it contacted Westmoreland at least 17 times over five months. It contemplated taking possession of the Deep Sea using the Derelict Vessel Removal Program, but knew its disposal could cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. And besides, there were boats in worse shape that were higher on the priority list.
Now the cost to the state is estimated at $2.6 million and more than a million shellfish in Penn Cove haven’t been harvested because of the pollution.
None of this should come as a surprise to the folks who know Westmoreland, as the Times’s reporting shows. It finds that Westmoreland is the neighbor from hell, a guy who runs what’s effectively an “unlicensed scrap yard,” pollutes the environment, reneges on deals, and always seems to stay one step ahead of the law.
That extra reporting turns an interesting story into a very good one, broadening it into one about how relatively small-time offenders, even serial ones, can slip through the regulatory cracks—even when they’re turning the lake blue with barrels of concentrated toilet cleaner. And it makes the pressure to do something about the culprit here that much greater.
So we have a story of government failure to act on a timely basis because that would have cost hundreds of thousands. Instead they wait until it costs the taxpayers millions.
Yeah, the story is about some sad sack boat owner.
#1 Posted by Patrick R. Sullivan, CJR on Thu 7 Jun 2012 at 03:29 PM
So let me get this straight. Patty R. Sullivan, prolific right wing troll of hisstoryisbunk.blogspot.com, is upset that the government wasn't activist enough. In his mind, the government should have assumed control of a private citizen's property and paid for the its disposal instead of entrusting the private citizen with the responsibilities over his property. By forgoing action on serial code violators, the government incurs cleanup costs to the taxpayer much in excess of the cost to taking action.
"This was no boat accident!"
It's a pretty good summary of the leftist critique of government in the run up to the financial crisis.
When did our right wing trolls get so... unsmart about their own ideas?
#2 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Thu 7 Jun 2012 at 04:13 PM
Did it escape your attention, Thimbles, that the boat was sitting in a 'public good'? That government has the legal responsibility for protecting that?
#3 Posted by Patrick R. Sullivan, CJR on Fri 8 Jun 2012 at 12:34 PM
Oh, totally agree. But the fact is you right wingers don't usually believe in things like "public good" or "a government's legal responsibilities" to protect them, otherwise you wouldn't spend the majority of your energy fighting environmental protection and regulation.
And the same goes for the the finance sector of the United States.
You right wingers are so eager to give the government a Nelson Muntz "Ha Ha!" that you forget what you're "Ha Ha"ing about undermines your regular stance on matters public.
Which I wouldn't mind, except you guys are rigid about keeping your discredited stance on resource exploitation, global warming, toxic emissions, etc...
We're here to clean up your messes in your mind, not prevent them. Therefore, in this instance, you should be commending the government's patience in letting this private citizen attempt to resolve issues with his own private property with minimal supervision and fines, not "Ha Ha"ing over the occasional, but unavoidable, misfortune that accompanies economic liberty. That is unless you think the government should be more active when it comes to protecting the public good.
Which I guess makes you a dirty Lib.
Hippie.
#4 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Fri 8 Jun 2012 at 01:36 PM
The question is the Government was less then active in using it's police powers to enforce a navigation hazard. Nevertheless, what is the proper reaction now? Shouldn't this man be forced to clean up the natural effects of his negligence? Should his property be confiscated to pay for this? If he does not have the means to pay for this, should he be imprisoned?
#5 Posted by pat b, CJR on Thu 30 Aug 2012 at 03:35 PM