I’ve felt for a while now that the kind of blogging I do — one person writing a series of blog posts in reverse-chronological order — is dying, even if it’s not quite dead. There are still lots of great blogs out there, but my Portfolio.com guide to the econoblogosphere, now almost four years old, is not nearly as out of date as it should be, and very few new voices have emerged since then.
One of the foremost exceptions to that rule is Alexis Madrigal at the Atlantic, so I asked him how he managed to break out as a name-brand blogger in a world where most big blogs are now written by pretty substantial teams. His home at the Atlantic is clearly part of it, as is the fact that he’s incredibly talented. But even he agreed that old-fashioned single-person blogs are largely a thing of the past, with the exception of enthusiastic practitioners in the fields they write about, be it banking or science or anything else. And those people normally blog independently, rather than as part of an old- or new-media company.
This is not necessarily a bad thing. There’s convergence going on — news organizations are becoming bloggier, and blogs are becoming newsier — and that process works to the benefit of both, even as it makes the status of “blogger” less interesting or meaningful. And as Alexis says, blogging is a lot of work, and it’s hard to sustain that level of intensity over the course of a career.
And the most interesting new development in the blogging space is Tumblr, which makes publishing much easier than Moveable Type or WordPress, and as a result is putting up some truly astonishing figures: 355 million unique visitors per month, and 400 million pageviews per day. I’d guess that’s substantially more than the entire blogosphere could boast during any golden age — Tumblr and Twitter have truly democratized publishing and helped to eradicate the distinction between writers and readers. Which is much more important than the emergence of any number of media-published individual voices.
(cross-posted from Reuters)
What would the insta-bloggers write about if it weren't for such hand-wringing, jackoff pieces about group bloggers taking over and personal bloggers dying out? There are so many mixed meanings in here that it's almost meaningless. The blog is simply a technology: software that allows a post by the writer followed by a list of reader comments. Felix seems to also be mixing in the writing style most commonly used by blogs, a more conversational tone, when he says news orgs are "becoming bloggier." Then there's the notion that blogs push a lot more content. Only the first, basic definition is intrinsic to blogging.
As far as I'm concerned, more group blogs are likely a positive. Rather than a single blogger scraping the bottom of the barrel for content for his next post, each group blogger can take longer to come up with potentially more polished pieces. After all, isn't that what a newspaper does, now that their printing press is no competitive advantage? Of course, one can always aggregate posts by personal bloggers anyway, whether on Google News or your own personal RSS feed, so the whole distinction is usually meaningless these days.
#1 Posted by Ajay, CJR on Sat 2 Jul 2011 at 02:56 AM