Looking for more good economic news? I see USA Today is ready to declare that the worst of the foreclosure crisis is behind us. But somehow, while some recent data may be pointing that way, this story seems to be getting a bit ahead of itself.
It’s worth taking a close look because, these days, news outlets may be feeling pressure to be the first to call the end of the bad housing news. Our advice: don’t bother. Better to look broadly, at a lot of data, not just a single stat, and go with that.
Here’s the USA Today lede, emphasis mine:
The share of homeowners behind on their mortgages fell in the first quarter, the first drop in four years and a possible sign that the foreclosure crisis has peaked.
But most of the supporting details in Wednesday’s story are about delinquencies, not foreclosures. I get that they’re connected, and common sense says that fewer delinquencies now means we’re going to see fewer foreclosures later. But they’re not the same thing, and the distinction remains blurry throughout the USA Today piece.
The portion of mortgages that were delinquent 30 days or more fell to 6.57% in the first quarter from 6.60% in the last three months of 2009, according to Equifax and Moody’s Economy.com.
That seems like a teeny tiny change. But Mark Zandi knows his stuff, and he sees it as significant. But he also seems to be telling USA Today that the delinquency stat doesn’t quite prove that the foreclosure crisis has peaked… At best, it signals that it might soon:
“It will take years to work through all the troubled mortgage loans in the foreclosure pipeline, but this is the first indication that the number of loans entering the pipeline is declining,” says Mark Zandi, chief economist for Moody’s Economy.com. “It portends a peaking of the foreclosure crisis.”
Ahh. “Portends a peaking…” That’s more like it.
But the story doesn’t seem to be listening to its own expert source. Instead, it goes on to list some “reasons for the improvement in the foreclosure rate.” Trouble is, there really hasn’t been an improvement yet.
Indeed, in a plot twist sure to confuse most readers, the same piece then goes on to contradict itself, warning that we should expect lots more foreclosures.
In the past two years, more than 5 million homes have received foreclosure notices, and more than 3 million are expected to get them this year, according to RealtyTrac.
There’s not much math to check there, but 5 million notices over two years vs. 3 million this year? That sounds like it’s getting worse
Indeed, that’s what RealtyTrac reported Thursday, that the foreclosure rate had surged, with its biggest jump in five years. Here’s the AP take:
A record number of U.S. homes were lost to foreclosure in the first three months of this year, a sign banks are starting to wade through the backlog of troubled home loans at a faster pace, according to a new report.
RealtyTrac Inc. said Thursday that the number of U.S. homes taken over by banks jumped 35 percent in the first quarter from a year ago. In addition, households facing foreclosure grew 16 percent in the same period and 7 percent from the last three months of 2009.
I guess that’s what Zandi was telling USA Today.
“There is still a foreclosure problem that is going to cause people to lose their homes, but in terms of new delinquencies starting, those are probably at their peak,” Zandi says. “This summer will be the peak of foreclosures started.”
Right. So what about the peak up in that first graf? Somehow, in an effort to call some kind of bottom (or top?), USA Today doesn’t do near enough to give readers a full—or clear—picture of the situation.
(For another media miss on the mortgage beat, check out Ryan’s post, about Bank of America’s new support for cramdown.)