The Washington Post has a very good story on the fall of Charlotte’s once-mighty banking industry and the impact on the city.
Charlotte’s the epicenter for this kind of thing, what with Wachovia’s exit and Bank of America’s new status as ward of the state, but the Post is smart to point out the damage the financial industry’s troubles have caused areas like Seattle, Wilmington, and Orange County, California.
Particularly interesting is this:
“I think there’s a new humility to Charlotte,” said Bob Morgan, president of the city’s Chamber of Commerce. “We didn’t worry too much about the things being done in Dallas, Atlanta, San Francisco,” he said, when banks in those cities were swallowed by Charlotte’s giants. “We are now living it ourselves.”
Morgan is talking about how Charlotte’s fortunes improved as its banks took over banks from those cities in what’s something like a zero-sum game (or negative even, with layoffs).
It wasn’t always thus, the Post’s Binyamin Appelbaum tells us:
Charlotte rose as a financial center thanks to deregulation. Until the 1980s, long-standing rules limited the ability of banks to operate in multiple states, and the largest banks were located in the largest cities. But as the government lifted those barriers, banks in smaller cities saw a chance to compete by clumping together.
And:
Deregulation allowed banks to avoid state caps on credit card interest rates by moving to states with lenient laws, such as Delaware and South Dakota. It also spurred mortgage lending by institutions other than banks.
But the once-ascendant city is getting hammered. Total pay is down a whopping 16 percent, philanthropy is down big. But most heartbreaking of all: Private-jet landings and takeoffs are off near 40 percent!
This piece is deeply reported. That’s in part because Appelbaum knows the town. He worked at the Charlotte Observer, where he was lead reporter on one of the best pieces of journalism of the last few years, the four-part “Sold a Nightmare” series on Beazer Homes.
There’s good information on bankers’ proportion of the workforce and their proportion of total pay and how the impact on the lost jobs has trickled down to the ancillary small businesses that served all those workers downtown. This in particular is great color:
One store is wholly devoted to objects emblazoned with the Bank of America logo, from T-shirts and golf balls to document shredders.
Shredders!
Great color, and great work by the Post.
I'm a little surprised that the the Columbia JOURNALISM review didn't review any of the journalism when it fawned over this article.
No one would disagree that Charlotte is going through some hard times are, but there also seems to be a well known axe to grind by Applebaum against Charlotte that a little investigation on your own part would have noted.
The article is also full of a number of glaring inconsistencies and errors.
A few:
The Gantt African American Center is far from Charlotte's "last hurrah" as in the next year the Becthler Museum, the Mint Musem, The NASCAR Hall of Fame and the NC Dance Studios are all opening.
The "regional power company" that is taking over Wachovia's tower and that Applebaum questioningly didn't name is Duke energy, a fortune 500 company and one of the largest energy companies in the nation.
The number of people in our soup kitchens have indeed risen, but I would like to know what city hasn't had a rise in need based requests. Seems to me a disingenuous implication.
Donations to Charlotte Cultural institutions have fallen dramatically, but again, name a city where that isn't happening in this economy... oh, and as a strange point not mentioned, The Blumenthal Broadway series and the Actors theater of Charlotte all recorded record breaking season subscription sales this year. Strange that wasn't mentioned.
The construction on the High rise condo tower did stop due to financing issues, and as Applebaum noted it is resumes (actually it has already) however the crane that was dismantled was scheduled to be taken down irregardless of financing as they had already topped out the building. A distinction that may not mean much unless you are a reporter and imply that the crane was dismantled due to the economy.
There is no mention of the recent growth of the energy sector in Charlotte including several companies opening offices here in the last year.
Finally the 1,000 teachers that were laid off were laid off because of reductions in the STATE budget and not the city's and what is not noted is that more than half of them have been brought back.
I think Applebaum is correct that Charlotte is going through dramatic change right now and that the downtown in the banking industry has hit this city harder than most however this article lacks context, facts and real investigation and does not provide any real insight on the city.
You may be right that the article is "colorful" but I am shocked that CJR would consider this a "great" piece.
#1 Posted by Mark, CJR on Thu 22 Oct 2009 at 06:03 AM