Talk about an emblem of welfare for rich folks: Parking garages built for the New York Yankees to accompany their new luxury-suite-stacked stadium in the Bronx.
The Yanks are by far the richest team in baseball, and if you’re driving to a game in the Bronx, rather than taking the subway, which goes right to the stadium, then you’re probably not hurting too much for cash. So the city handed over prime park space to developers to build 2,000 parking spots to be used three hours at a time, eighty or ninety times a year. That includes one garage that’s strictly for VIPs.
A WNYC piece on the fiasco has a great lede:
In the far North Bronx, near the Yonkers border, right fielder Stephan Alamies of the All Hallows High School varsity baseball team is batting against Mount Saint Michael. This is a home game for All Hallows-but they’re playing on their opponents’ field. They drove 45 minutes by bus to get here. Coach Edgardo Guttierez says the team used to play four blocks from school.
“Unfortunately, the Yankees built their parking lot on the field that we used to practice on,” he said.
On the team bus, the players weren’t any happier than their coach. “We feel like a bunch of gypsies just traveling all over the place,” said Alamies before the other players chimed in: “It’s depressing.” “People want to come see us but they can’t see us. We don’t have a home field, we don’t know where we’re at.”
The team, like the rest of the neighborhood around Yankee Stadium, is still waiting for promised replacement fields.
It’s an urban planning nightmare. The city has the most extensive public transportation system in the country, but it handed over scarce parkland in the poorest district in the country to build parking lots for folks paying $338 for a family of four to see a game. And if you are going to screw local residents in favor of outsiders with money, at least use some common sense and build something on top of the parking, like housing or hotels. It’s a dense area and that space has to be worth money to non-parking developers.
The city did commit to building new parks to replace the old ones, but those will cost it some $200 million. And it’s supposed to get rent from the garage developer, but it’s unlikely it ever will, according to the back in March.
That’s because, to top this all off, it turns out the parking garage development is a white elephant. Its $35 parking spots sit two-thirds empty even on game days, and the developer has defaulted on the $237 million in taxpayer-subsidized bonds used to build it. It owes $17 million, including back rent, to the city. Great work, guys.
The garages, of course, are just a small part of the corporate welfare New York City and State gave the Yankees. Good Jobs New York, a corporate-welfare watchdog group, put their combined subsidies at half a billion dollars.
Meantime, the Yankees are doing just fine, thanks. Revenue at their new taxpayer-subidized stadium, sure to be deemed outdated and in need of new subsidies in ten to fifteen years, has doubled from the old one.
(h/t Atrios, who, as usual, puts it as succinctly as possible.)

This is the kind of stupidity you get when you let liberals run things....
#1 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Sat 21 May 2011 at 05:00 PM
Actually, New York City has had Republican mayors since 1994 - Guiliani and then Bloomberg. Yankee President Randy Levine is a powerful Republican -- gave generously to Rudy Guiliani's failed presidential campaign, Christine Quinn in the story is also a wacko Republican of the Young Republican Club genre.
So it was a big giveaway from Republican politicians to Republican rich guys. This is the kind of stupidity you get when you let Republicans run things.
#2 Posted by James, CJR on Sun 22 May 2011 at 01:16 AM
James dances the The Ole' Liberal Two-Step.
Nice try, but no cigar, James.
Let's ride the Reality Train all the way into station, shall we?
As the article clearly notes, this parking lot boondoggle cleared the New York City Council by a 44 to 3 vote, and the Democrat Speaker of the council is its chief proponent.
The Council has 46 Democrats and 5 Republicans, by the way.
And Bloomberg isn't currently a Republican, either, as you claim he is.
This kind of nonsense is indeed what you get when you let liberals run things..
#3 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Sun 22 May 2011 at 11:55 PM
James actually wrote: Christine Quinn in the story is also a wacko Republican of the Young Republican Club genre.
padikiller tolls the Reality Bell:
James... Are you on crack?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christine_Quinn
Try again, Jimbo...
#4 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Mon 23 May 2011 at 12:18 AM
For what it's worth, it was Giuliani who agreed to allow both the Yankees and the Mets to build new stadiums, including letting the teams keep 96% of ticket revenues, 100% of all other (including parking) revenues; allowing them to be exempt from sales and property tax, and subsidizing the stadium with low-cost electricity. Business leaders critized the deal. Bloomberg tried to back out of it, but the deal cut by Giuliani loosened the teams' leases with the city, allowing them to leave on 60 days notice if the city backed out of the deal.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yankee_Stadium
#5 Posted by Rick Sullivan, CJR on Mon 23 May 2011 at 01:52 PM
Who cares who gave the farm away, the kids and citizens that live in that neighborhood certainly don't, all they want is a place to park, a place to play ball and spend some time outside besides the stoop or the street.
At his point Rep/Dem, they're all the same, pocketing money from developers, pacs and lobbyists while turning their backs on the people they were elected to serve. Oops guess that's a naive idea, they are serving the people that bought them!
#6 Posted by john171, CJR on Mon 23 May 2011 at 01:55 PM
It matters whose ideology is at work here. And in fact it isn't conservatives or liberals, it's centrists. This nonsense started back in 1972, when the Colts left Baltimore for Indianapolis. Baltimore Mayor William Donald Schaefer decided he would do whatever it took to get a football team back in town, and ever since then, big public benefits packages for stadiums has been the norm. Schaefer was a machine Democrat. As Governor he supported George Bush the elder. Guys like John Rowland (felonious governor of Connecticut, and a Republican) played the same game decades later (Rowland got played by Patriots owner Robert Kraft, who used him as a patsy to get a better deal out of Massachusetts).
Crazy givaways for the rich, massive subsidies for stadiums and downtown waterfront hotels and convention centers and all that other crap are exclusively the work of centrists, of self-proclaimed "realists,' from both major U.S. political parties.
Liberals generally oppose this stuff, as do conservatives and libertarians, and for many of the same reasons.
But they are not considered "serious people."
#7 Posted by Edward Ericson Jr., CJR on Tue 24 May 2011 at 10:24 AM
Yes. Centrists, BUT. I agree that liberals generally oppose this stuff, but the majority of these massive taxpayer giveaways to billionaire sports owners and mall developers (and prison contractors) have been pro-business Republicans (conservatives). I don't deny that centrist Dems have jumped on the gravy train as well, but centrist Dems of today, in reality, are the remnants of the moderate Republicans of yesteryear, i.e., conservatives. And libertarians -- well, they usually keep their disapproval to themselves, if it exists. For a decade or more, the libertarians with platforms or public office have been extremely supportive of just about anything that Big Business demands. If you have data to the contrary, Mr. Erickson, I'd like to see it. Trumpeting one egregious anecdote and pretending like it is the norm is not going to cut it.
#8 Posted by James, CJR on Tue 24 May 2011 at 12:25 PM
You guys are nuts.
Giuliani is a liberal with an "R" next to his name on the ballot. But it doesn't matter because the City Council sealed the deal after Bloomberg and the City Council chickened out. The City Council did this deal, and that is just the simple reality here.
Bloomberg is a lifelong Democrat who switched sides to get elected and then dumped the GOP after he nixed term limits and he didn't have the balls to tell the Yankees to pound sand.
Christine Quinn is a liberal Democrat and so are about 90 percent of her New York City Council cohorts who passed this silly boondoggle waste of taxpayer money. She also, as any good liberal New York politico does, maintains her own 17 million dollar slush fund through fictitious accounting method that let her pay off her panderers without scrutiny.
This kind of stupidity is always what happens when liberals run things.
#9 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Tue 24 May 2011 at 08:33 PM