Fox News may be ahead in quantity of Acorn-related coverage (between Saturday and today at 3:00pm, TVEyes shows 556 mentions of “acorn” on Fox News, to CNN’s 67 and MSNBC’s 17; if you search on “a.c.o.r.n.” the numbers are 280 for Fox, 92 for CNN and 33 for MSNBC.). But CNN is clearly winning in quality, as evidenced by this story intro:
… an Acorn not falling from the candidate’s tree? Barack Obama and John McCain’s connections to a group being investigated for possible voter registration fraud…
Both acorns and apples, yes, fall from trees but only apples have an idiom about it. Why nut-up an apple idiom for a story intro (can “Acorn of candidate’s ear” be far behind?) when acorns have their own idioms? Even a blind pig can find an Acorn is probably not an option in the age of LipstickOnAPigGate but there’s always Mighty oaks from little Acorns grow. (Mighty votes?)
A few minutes ago CNN used another apple expression and then just tacked Acorn on at the end:
Could a few bad apples be hurting Acorn?
How ‘bout them Acorn? Which is to say: Megan is working on a piece that really digs into recent Acorn-related press coverage (check Campaign Desk later today).


Megan is working on a piece that really digs into recent Acorn-related press coverage
I smells me a whitewash.
Posted by Carl Stevens on Wed 15 Oct 2008 at 04:41 PM
And--sorry to keep you waiting, Carl--said whitewash will be coming tomorrow.
Posted by Megan Garber on Wed 15 Oct 2008 at 05:04 PM
Who has the power to convict ACORN? It's long overdue. Conyer's is a coward beholden to the democratic party.
Susan Tenofsky
smtenof@yahoo.com
Posted by susan Tenofsky on Thu 28 May 2009 at 11:26 AM