This American Life host Ira Glass recently did an “Ask Me Anything” on Reddit. “Sound_Sop” asked him: “It’s 2012 and I’m in journalism school. Am I an idiot?” Glass responded: “short answer: no. There’ll be journalism somewhere. There’ll be jobs. Longer answer: depends on which school.”
True. But even attending one of the best journalism schools in the country is no guarantee of future success if you don’t do your homework before, during, and afterwards.
I graduated from Columbia Graduate School of Journalism five months ago. Several of my classmates have gone on to exciting and fulfilling jobs in the field. Two of them went on to write essays about why their graduate school experience wasn’t worth the time (10 months) or money (a lot) they spent on it. I encourage anyone thinking of applying to j-school, especially Columbia, to read their pieces. And then to read mine.
In “My $60,000 Ivy League Degree was Just a Pyramid Scheme,” published on Policymic and the Huffington Post, Lilly O’Donnell complained about how, two months after graduation, she realized that her monthly student loan payments were so high that she’d have to forsake the “ascetic life of a creative young adult,” trading in freelance assignments and bartending shifts for “a real job — probably not even the kind of job I paid so much to be qualified for.” In between about 15 clichés and mixed metaphors, her point seems to be that graduate school was really expensive and now she has to pay for it, and no one told her it would be like this. “I was assured over and over again that everyone has debt; that it’s not a big deal — often with a wink and a reassuring pat on the arm.” Instead of looking into what $90,000 in student loans would mean after graduation, she decided that “looming debt was my invitation to adulthood.” Apparently O’Donnell didn’t get said invitation the day she turned 18.
Ankita Rao wrote about her j-school experience on her personal blog, which was subsequently picked up by (and re-worked for) Quartz. I had a class with Rao, and she seemed like a self-aware, hard-working student. So I was surprised to read that she thought she would’ve been better served by taking her “Columbia money” and spending it reporting and traveling the world “Anderson-Cooper-style.” First of all, for most of us, accessing the money used to attend school — student loans and scholarships — is contingent upon matriculating. Or maybe there’s a new world-traveling, boundary-pushing loan I didn’t know about? Second of all, Anderson Cooper’s mother is heiress Gloria Vanderbilt.
You’d think that Rao, who wrote that she was too experienced to be stuck in a place for students who never “experimented with their local newspapers” would know that it’s “lede,” not “lead” when referring to the start of a story. And that maybe she shouldn’t be so reluctant to “credit graduate school for any small success I have now, or may have in the future” when I doubt she would have gotten the job she currently has without that j-school degree. At the very least, she wouldn’t have been published on Quartz, since that came to be through one of her j-school professors who works there.* Okay, now I’ll stop.
Though O’Donnell and Rao’s main points differ (Rao blames her issues with the school on her own misguided motivations for attending it; O’Donnell on its considerable cost), they do have this in common: their essays smack of the kind of naivety and entitlement that I suspect is much more to blame for their unhappiness with Columbia j-school than the school itself is. The fact that neither woman appeared to do much research about the school, the programs it offered, or how to pay for it suggests that they either didn’t want to do that kind of reporting in the first place or didn’t know how. They weren’t ready for an expensive professional school for journalism, and that’s why they didn’t get much out of it.