I’m really disturbed by CNN’s decision to fire Octavia Nasr, a senior editor for Middle East affairs at the network, for this tweet:
Sad to hear of the passing of Sayyed Mohammad Hussein Fadlallah.. One of Hezbollah’s giants I respect a lot.. #Lebanon
I’ll admit to never having heard of Fadlallah until today. But as Glenn Greenwald points out, he isn’t universally viewed as a monster. His death drew effusive sympathies from Britain’s ambassador to Lebanon. Writing for Foreign Policy, David Kenner paints a picture of a “complex man” who had some differences with Hezbollah, the movement that the U.S. government lumped him in with.
Nasr subsequently explained in a blog post that her “respect,” which she expressed just as news of his death spread, was mostly for his relatively enlightened views on the role of women in Shia Islam, and did not extend to his full range of political views, which include downplaying the Holocaust and support for attacks on Israel. (She also noted that decades ago, while she worked for the Lebanese Broadcasting Corporation, he gave her a 45-minute on camera interview—something that I take was rather generous, given her youth, her Christianity, and her gender.)
Whatever his faults—and to be absolutely clear it seems he had some pretty grave ones—CNN could have simply said, as Nasr did in her explanatory blog post, that quickly tossed off 140 character missives aren’t good at capturing a full life and explaining that life’s place in Lebanon’s unusually complicated politics and history. (Obvious, no?)
And then they should have let Nasr go about her job of helping the network try to explain the Middle East, a region where the cast of characters are often not all good or all bad, especially when judged against powerful players who would be illiberal in the global context, but mainstream in their home countries.
Instead they chose to throw her overboard, saying in an internal memo that they felt the message meant that “her credibility in her position as senior editor for Middle Eastern affairs has been compromised going forward.”
Anyone who felt that that tweet, especially once it was followed up by a straightforward post explaining her full meaning and contextualizing Fadlallah’s life, indelibly compromised her ability to do her job isn’t the sort of person that will ever hold confidence in CNN’s reporting. It’s a shame that CNN’s leadership stands among them today.

I would have been shocked if she had been kept on. Anyone who is surprised by this hasn't been following CNN the last few years. FOX is dutifully awful and MSNBC is generally weak, but CNN is impossible to caricature.
#1 Posted by LorenzoStDuBois, CJR on Thu 8 Jul 2010 at 01:33 PM
Now just imagine what CNN would do if she had called a supreme court justice a goat f*cking child molester.
They're pretty tough bosses I hear.
PS. CNN has blackballed kos.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/7/7/882214/-Why-I-am-blacklisted-by-MSNBC
I got no dog in that fight but it seems to me there's a lot of sacrifices to the conservative political correctness gods lately. It's like suddenly technology has given a bullhorn for to any person to express their thoughts as they come, and conservatives have discovered what a wonderful weapon this is.
And they have the messaging to get you fired, be you a respected 20 year veteran of the middle east news bureau or the voice actor for the Geico gecko.
This of course will result in a shut down of expression and self-censorship, which is a one way street when it comes to conservatives considering how they don't mind mainstreaming questions of presidential citizenship and IRS shock troops and the impending census threat.
People should be allowed to express themselves and clarify if necessary without being terrified of how a careless word will end their career. That producing a chilling effect in the journalistic environment where being frank can end your tenure.
(The only exception to this, because I know someone will bring it up, is the military which must maintain a subservient, apolitical role to civilian leadership. Stanley McChrystal does not get a pass)
#2 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Thu 8 Jul 2010 at 02:12 PM
What kind of effect, Clint, is this almost McCarthyite grip on national journalism by the neoconservative right having on your profession? Are you all talking about it privately, in low whispers, or have you failed to connect the dots as yet? Surely these vicious purges are having a chilling effect on your colleagues' reporting and writing. Is anyone going to push back, or are they going to be cowering in fear and further towing the neoconservative line, in fear of their livelihood? I'm asking seriously.
#3 Posted by Tom, CJR on Thu 8 Jul 2010 at 02:18 PM
Well put, Mr. Hendler. The whole ordeal is more telling of CNN's biases and political views than of Ms. Nasr's. The AP, NYT, et al., could take a lesson in journalism from this blog post alone. Thanks.
#4 Posted by D.A., CJR on Fri 9 Jul 2010 at 09:16 AM
incredulous, a journalist should be unbiased and it is their responsiblity to report the news without prejudice shown, to exhibit the sort of statement displayed is a departure from true and accurate belief in reporting, cnn is to be complimented in their actions and more of our collective media should follow suit when a gaffe of this sort is unconvered and revealed.
#5 Posted by NORMAN KAFFEE, CJR on Fri 9 Jul 2010 at 02:33 PM
Classic CJR analysis. You never heard of the guy in question so you aren't that offended.
Read a history book. Does CJR hire anyone who knows anything? Hezbollah killed 241 American servicemen. It's a terror group. When you praise a terror group, Americans don't like it.
The big problem here isn't that she was fired, it's that she was hired and helped guide the news of a major network for two decades.
#6 Posted by Dan Gainor, CJR on Fri 9 Jul 2010 at 03:49 PM
Nasr didn't "praise a terror group." That's an outright, provable lie. Your overwrought hyperbole is typical rightwing extremist tactics designed to shut people up and divert rational discussion.
I daresay that few "Americans," save the fanatic neoconservatives who grip and control the discourse in Washington DC, but nowhere else, have even heard about this issue, and those who have are shocked at the precipitous firing of a woman who has been with CNN for 20 years. Not everyone -- in fact, very very few Americans-- are obssessed with the details and vagaries of domestic Lebanese politics, I daresay.
#7 Posted by Tom, CJR on Fri 9 Jul 2010 at 06:46 PM
Tom:
Consider the source above - Dan Gainor is a well known radical far-right extremist. Expecting rationality from a deranged mouthpiece for fascism won't get anyone very far.
#8 Posted by Marion Delgado, CJR on Fri 9 Jul 2010 at 11:14 PM
"Hezbollah killed 241 American servicemen. It's a terror group. When you praise a terror group, Americans don't like it."
Where did that happen? What was going on during the time?
By that definition the Afghan resistance was a terror group and conservative Americans supplied them weapons while praising them as freedom fighters.
And the reporter in question did not praise Hezbollah, she praised a cleric of Hezbollah who was a moderate, very liberal when it came to women's status, and was a victim of a terrorist attack that killed 256 people, reportedly carried out by the CIA.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sayyed_Mohammad_Hussein_Fadlallah
I hope you don't praise the American government, they're a terrorist group that executes attacks on civilians. Oh the humanity.
It's a good thing the most important metric of the news business has become popularity. I'd hate for something like truth to be reported from an unpopular view.
#9 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Sat 10 Jul 2010 at 12:56 AM
I have seen a systematic effort to eliminate anyone, from job or office, who expresses views that are counter to AIPAC and their followers. Three that I can recall are Mel Gibson, Helen Thomas, and now Octavia Nasr. Politicians in both parties are afraid of AIPAC. Ms. Nasr was a professional and did a great service for understanding the Middle East. She harmed no one.
#10 Posted by RIchard6, CJR on Sun 11 Jul 2010 at 02:00 PM
Suppose a CNN "professional journalist" had been fired for twitteringthusly:
"Sad to hear of the passing of Randall Terry .. One of Operation Rescue’s giants I respect a lot.."
Or perhaps this:
"Sad to hear of the passing of Richard Butler Terry .. One of Aryan Nation's giants I respect a lot.."
Would we find CJR-Land awash in indignation at such a firing?...
HUH?
Do you shameless hacks even bother to stop and ask yourselves questions like this one?
Leave your politics at the door and do your damned jobs.
#11 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Sun 11 Jul 2010 at 05:29 PM
Hmm. Padikiller puts Randall Terry and Richard Butler and their respective white power organizations on a par with Hezbollah. Interesting. I wonder if Abe Foxman and William Kristol think so as well. Shouldn't they be on the terrorist list and their supporters arrested, then?
#12 Posted by James, CJR on Sun 11 Jul 2010 at 05:40 PM
Operation Rescue isn't a white power outfit. It's an anti-abortion outfit.
And whether or not it or the Aryan Nation is a terrorist organiztion is a matter of heated debate and highly polarized opinion.
However, there is no question that, like Hezbollah, the IRA, the Tamil Tigers or myriad others, each of these organizations is radical, deliberately controversial and associated with violence.
A "professional journalist" has no business lamenting the passing of a leader of any such extremist group.
PERIOD.
#13 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Sun 11 Jul 2010 at 05:51 PM
Bull. A) He was a moderate leader within that group.
B) That group has become more political than militant over time. It started out as militant and used guerrilla terrorism, but that was in the context of the Israeli occupation of Lebanon.
To you, Hezbollah is a big bogeyman who rapes and murders the innocent lambs of the middle east if they don't go to sleep after they're tucked in.
To the people of the middle east, and Lebanon specifically, they represent a social organization that provides services often when the government fails to. Hezbollah means more in the middle east than in the west which supports terrorism conducted under a Star of David banner.
Is Israel a country of terrorism because of the past and present acts of its citizens? No, that's an oversimplification. Should someone be fired for eulogizing a giant of Zionism? No. Overly simple minds react like that, especially when someone explains their actions as praise for the person and not the organization.
She was hired and worked for a media company based on her expertise on the middle east, and she was fired because she made a comment based on her expertise in the middle east. All this demonstrates is that when expertise runs counter to American prejudice, expertise had better take a back seat because defending prejudice is more important.
#14 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Sun 11 Jul 2010 at 06:57 PM
Thimbles wrote: A) He was a moderate leader within that group.
***because Thimbles says so, of course (so he supported suicide bombing... so what? - he's a "moderate" terrorist***
B) That group has become more political than militant over time
*** Or so says Thimbles (though Obama's defense secretary admits that Hezbollah is better armed than most countries are and everbody knows that Hezbollah is armed by Syria and Iran)******
Just more of the same opinionated schtick from Thimbles...
#15 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Sun 11 Jul 2010 at 07:19 PM
The problem is that you thought police throw around the anti-Semitic!!!!!!!!!! bludgeon and the TERRRRRISTT!!!!!! bugaboo so often that it's lost its meaning. Ho hum. The neocons are up in arms again?
Anti-Semitic!!! Boo!!!!
Terrorist organization!!! Booga booga!!!
Yawn. Padikiller rides again.
Furthermore, few Americans know or care anything about obscure Lebanese politics. They have their own to worry about.
#16 Posted by Tom, CJR on Sun 11 Jul 2010 at 07:58 PM
Hezbollah is officially designated a terrorist organization by the US, Canada, Great Britain and Australia.
I guess that makes Obama a nutcase right-winger?
#17 Posted by JLD, CJR on Mon 12 Jul 2010 at 08:48 AM
Yeah, Obama is quite a conservative. He escalated Afghanistan and replaced Petraus with a Buck Turgidson character who thinks "it’s fun to shoot some people.". He's got serious changes in store for social security and his right wing healthcare reform that left private businesses with a captive consumer market. I could go on, but Obama isn't really the topic here, so what's your point?
#18 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Mon 12 Jul 2010 at 12:18 PM
One of my favorite parts of this "discourse" is getting blasted by those too cowardly to use their real names. I use mine and it goes with about 20 years journalism experience. Those who don't, well...
#19 Posted by Dan Gainor, CJR on Mon 12 Jul 2010 at 06:17 PM
Blow it out your arse, Dan. Bozwell's circle jerk operation doesn't count as journalism and its Stasi jerks like yourself who use personal details to harass critics and opinionators you don't like that force others to use anonymity. Octavia Nasr used her name and what did the conservative gestapo do? Harass her bosses until she got fired. Same with Weigel.
http://www.cjr.org/campaign_desk/look_at_us.php
You suck Dan, but don't worry, I don't plan on going to your boss or finding ways to harass your family or do the dozens of things conservatives do on a regular basis to intimidate and discredit their opponents. I'm not a ratf*cker, which makes one of us I suppose.
#20 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Mon 12 Jul 2010 at 09:43 PM
Pretty funny on a thread about how Bozell's rightwing thought police just destroyed another journo's career that one of his thugs thinks we all should be using our real names -- so as to make your dirty work that much easier, eh, Dan? Fat chance.
#21 Posted by Tom, CJR on Tue 13 Jul 2010 at 12:14 AM
If some of these comments are to be taken seriously:
-- Hezbollah is merely a social organization providing basic services to the poor
-- the US is a terrorist operation
-- the Beirut bombing was not an act of terrorism
-- the Media Research Center is the Stasi
-- even if Hezbollah could be shown to have engaged in terrorism, Sayyed Mohammad Hussein Fadlallah was a feminist who just happened to belong to that organization and was a "moderate" terrorist deserving of praise.
I'm not convinced Thimbles got the best of this debate.
#22 Posted by stutzenbach, CJR on Wed 14 Jul 2010 at 10:33 PM
"Hezbollah is merely a social organization providing basic services to the poor"
Didn't say that.
"the Beirut bombing was not an act of terrorism"
Didn't say that.
"the US is a terrorist operation"
Didn't say that. What I said was the Lebanon acts were conducted in the context of a war in which Israel was the occupier. If you ignore the context of the war, then Hezbollah's conduct fits the definition of terrorism.. and so does America's.
"the Beirut bombing was not an act of terrorism"
Didn't say that, see above.
"the Media Research Center is the Stasi"
You got me.
"Sayyed Mohammad Hussein Fadlallah was a feminist who just happened to belong to that organization and was a "moderate" terrorist deserving of praise.
I'm not convinced Thimbles got the best of this debate."
You're not from the middle east, are you.
#23 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Thu 15 Jul 2010 at 02:25 AM
LOL. As if i had anything to do with Weigel's self immolation. Don't worry, I am sure some editor will hire him and ignore his hackery. At least it might serve as a lesson: Journalists have merely discovered that the things used against people -- politicians, sports stars, musicians, etc. -- for decades can now be used against them.
I find the whole fiasco amazing for the hypocrisy of some in journalism. Gosh, there was a leak of e-mails. Since when do journos complain about that? Oh, yeah, when it's one of their friends or might be used against THEM.
Again, Thimbles and others here make my point for me. That many journalists are so biased and so unprofessional that they can't keep it under wraps -- either on Twitter or here.
#24 Posted by Dan Gainor, CJR on Thu 15 Jul 2010 at 10:53 PM
Sorry about the firing of Octavia Nasr.
One MUST consider the position of CNN (AOL - Time Warner)
Gerald Levin, CEO and Director of AOL Time Warner is a JEW.
Do you think he would take kindly to remarks SUPPORTING this
character of Hamas? Not likely
#25 Posted by gerald, CJR on Fri 24 Sep 2010 at 01:34 PM
Great post Gerald .... could I borrow you copy of the Elder Protocols? I seem to have misplaced mine.
#26 Posted by Mike H, CJR on Fri 24 Sep 2010 at 01:56 PM