On Tuesday came the chilling news from CBS News that chief foreign correspondent Lara Logan, while reporting a 60 Minutes segment in Cairo’s Tahrir Square on February 11th, “suffered a brutal and sustained sexual assault and beating” and is now in the United States recovering.
The news has since inspired some smart, stirring writing and thinking (see, for starters, Mac McClelland at Mother Jones on ”What Journalism Can Learn from the Lara Logan Story,” and Melissa Bell at the Washington Post’s Blogpost). It has also, you may have heard, inspired some less smart and some downright deplorable responses (Jezebel has a round-up of some of this under the headline: “After Lara Logan’s Sexual Assault, Media Helpfully Discuss Her Hotness.”)
In 2007, Judith Matloff, who “was foreign correspondent specializing in areas of turmoil for twenty years, covering more than sixty nations,” wrote a piece for CJR about sexual abuse, an “unspoken” but not uncommon problem for female foreign correspondents. The piece is now, as ever, a tough but worthy read. It begins:
The photographer was a seasoned operator in South Asia. So when she set forth on an assignment in India, she knew how to guard against gropers: dress modestly in jeans secured with a thick belt and take along a male companion. All those preparations failed, however, when an unruly crowd surged and swept away her colleague. She was pushed into a ditch, where several men set upon her, tearing at her clothes and baying for sex. They ripped the buttons off her shirt and set to work on her trousers.
“My first thought was my cameras,” recalls the photographer, who asked to remain anonymous. “Then it was, ‘Oh my God, I’m going to be raped.’ ” With her faced pressed into the soil, she couldn’t shout for help, and no one would have heard her anyway above the mob’s taunts. Suddenly a Good Samaritan in the crowd pulled the photographer by the camera straps several yards to the feet of some policemen who had been watching the scene without intervening. They sneered at her exposed chest, but escorted her to safety.
Alone in her hotel room that night, the photographer recalls, she cried, thinking, “What a bloody way to make a living.“ She didn’t inform her editors, however. “I put myself out there equal to the boys. I didn’t want to be seen in any way as weaker.”
“Quantify[ing] this problem,” Matloff acknowledged, is itself a problem. “The shame runs so deep-and the fear of being pulled off an assignment, especially in a time of shrinking budgets, is so strong,” she wrote, that hardly anyone is willing to talk about it. Matloff also noted that:
[A]mazingly, there are no sections on sexual harassment and assault in the leading handbooks on journalistic safety, by the Committee to Protect Journalists and the International Federation of Journalists.When one considers the level of detail over protections against other eventualities-get vaccinations; pack dummy wallets, etc.-the oversight is staggering.
Mother Jones’s McClelland checked in yesterday with CPJ and reports that they will include a section on sexual assault in the next edition of their safety handbook, due out later this year. Writes McClelland:
It’s about damn time. Hopefully that inclusion and today’s headlines will lead to a broader push by the Fourth Estate to protect correspondents against assault. Because that its obvious responsibility. And because it will protect, too, the crucial stories—including those about sexual violence—that reporters are dispatched to cover.
What should also be mentioned is that this incident occurred in an environment where this kind of thing is rampant.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7514567.stm
It's so rampant that they've made a movie about it, in Egypt:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-02-14/egyptian-women-battle-sexual-abuse-after-decades-of-silence-movie-reveals.html
There's no way this is Lara Logan's fault and those who made sport of her bringing it on herself should realize that this is happening to thousands of Egyptian women to the extent where it made the news - in Mubarak's Egypt.
Are those thousands of women asking for it too?
Lara was doing her job, a job that involves a lot of risk and takes a lot of courage. I don't understand the mentality that smirks when a reporter falls victim to those risks.
I didn't hear chuckling when it was Daniel Pearl. I hope she recovers, because her work has been incredibly valuable over the years.
#1 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Thu 17 Feb 2011 at 06:04 PM
It is really shocking to me that CJR can praise Nir Rosen through the roof, as they have repeatedly in the past, but they can write a post about the attacks on Lara Logan and ignore the man who tweeted she had it coming.
Don't bore me with your supposed high-minded post because you're full of it. As C.I. of The Common Ill spointed out today,
http://thecommonills.blogspot.com/2011/02/iraq-snapshot_17.html
"And we should remember what Thomas E. Ricks refuses to grasp, every rapist believes a woman had it coming. Every rapist has the same mind set as Nir Rosen and the poster at Ricks' site that we quoted. Does that mean Nir Rosen is a rapist? No. But that mind-set is found in rapists. It needs to be called out. Loudly."
Until CJR has the guts to call out that mindset quit pretending you're any different, quit pretending that you're mentioning this or that article about dangers in foreign lands means you come off enlightened or aware. You call out the mind set that encourages sexual assaults or you stay silent and know that your silence means more women get sexually assaulted.
#2 Posted by Laurel, CJR on Thu 17 Feb 2011 at 10:07 PM
The saddest thing is that this whole situation could have been avoided if CBS has taken some precautions: http://morningquickie.com/2011/02/18/why-lara-logan-raped-female-reporter-safety/
#3 Posted by Morning Quickie, CJR on Fri 18 Feb 2011 at 12:16 AM
"On Tuesday came the chilling news from CBS News that chief foreign correspondent Lara Logan, while reporting a 60 Minutes segment in Cairo’s Tahrir Square on February 11th.."
The "chilling" things here, from a news consumer point of view, are that (i) CBS sat on the story for four days, and (ii) that none of the "watchdogs" here are calling CBS or any of the MSM outlets for going dark on the story.
#4 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Fri 18 Feb 2011 at 03:50 PM
From what I understand, Nir Rosen has apologized and regrets commenting on a situation before he realized how serious the situation was. From what I understand, there was a little bit of hostility amongst some journalists for Lara's comments against Michael Hastings over the McCrystal scandal. I'm not going to let Lara's stupid criticism against one journalist taint her whole body of work, and I'm not going to let Nir's stupid criticism against Lara taint his, especially when he's not defending his comments and regrets every 140 set of characters he typed.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_thecutline/20110217/ts_yblog_thecutline/obama-calls-logan-cooper-grills-rosen
If I've read the situation correctly, he probably assumed that it was a sexual attack, a pinch on the rear or a groping, that she received before the soldiers marched in. He didn't know it was a crowd of 200 surrounding and a sustained rape.
People say stupid things, people say uncautious things, and - now that we're tweeting them - everyone knows what we've said before our brains have engaged. Getting people fired over tweets, like the CNN reporter who eulogized a leader of Hezbollah, or raising their ignorant tweets about an act to the level of the act itself is wrong.
If he continued to defend those comments, that would be one thing, but he hasn't.
#5 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Fri 18 Feb 2011 at 07:06 PM
If any of my employees had tweeted such a thing, I'd have shown the offending employee the door as soon as I learned of it.
His comments aren't just "stupid". They indicate a deep and darker problem that pervades the far left (and also the far right to be sure) - an affinity toward violence against political enemies at worst or a ready tolerance for such violence at best.
This guy should be dropping fries or polishing bowling balls in Brooklyn. I'm glad he got the axe.
#6 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Fri 18 Feb 2011 at 08:09 PM
"His comments aren't just "stupid". They indicate a deep and darker problem that pervades the far left (and also the far right to be sure) - an affinity toward violence against political enemies at worst or a ready tolerance for such violence at best."
A) His comments were dumb, not violent. They didn't wish violence upon the person, they lacked sympathy because, according to him, he didn't realize the full extent of the attack. Youd have to go far far far left for someone to wish for someone to be raped, attacked, or killed.
B) For equally stupid comments, involving making light of a boy who was kidnapped and raped repeatedly, you have to go as far right as Bill OReilly..
http://mediamatters.org/research/200701170009
and much worse can be found right of that.
Don't turn this into a left right thing. It's a stupidity thing and, at least in Nir Rosen's case, he was loudly condemned for it and he regrets it - none of which is true for the right and Bill OReilly.
#7 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Fri 18 Feb 2011 at 09:16 PM
The Lara Logan case has an eerie similarity with the case of (the rescue of)Private Jessica Lynch, in so far as both ladies have been at pains to proclaim that they are "in no sense weaker than the boys."
There are several issues here. One, the issue of safety: If you believe in risk taking, there are no masculine-feminine issues here. In one case you may get shot, in another raped and traumatized. Also, it is not just the "female journalist" but all females at risk in male-dominated societies. Second, why is it that a woman must always proclaim "masculinity" to be seen as strong? She has a thousand other strengths that she count on. I think the very fact that a woman tries to be seen "as strong as a male" is unwitting acknowledgement of some deep rooted complex that the modern woman should shrug off as soon as possible.
#8 Posted by Shreesh, CJR on Sat 19 Feb 2011 at 05:44 AM
I'm still trying to figure out why the MSM sat on the story for four days.
I wonder how many other women were attacked in this interim?
Calling all "watchdogs"! Can one of you figure it out?
#9 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Sun 20 Feb 2011 at 04:19 PM
I caught Nir Rosen's big apology and I have to say... it's a little lame.
http://www.salon.com/life/feature/2011/02/17/nir_rosen_explains_twitter_controversy/index.html
You dun goofed up Rosen and, yeah, right wingers make comments and get away with it and Logan yapped about the McChrystal contorversy and all that yadda yadda but you're not the victim here.
The approach he should have taken is "I didn't realize it was rape (journalists get grabbed a lot), even if it were just a grab - it was a mistake to speak the way I did, this is a real problem and I was speaking stupid. Here are some other stories I like to tell"
Not "I was miffed at Logan because she sucks and she's white and therefore her getting raped is a distraction from all the other stuff and why are all these tight wingers picking on me and so therefore, don't hold it against me. I was gallows joking!"
I don't want to understand why you typed, I don't want to hear your defense for why Lara is a legitimate target except in case of rape, I want you to apologize and move on with your work while demonstrating that you are going to hold yourself to a higher standard.
Sorry Nir, but after 1400 words, you still look like a jerk.
This, on the other hand, was worth reading;
http://www.propublica.org/article/breaking-the-code-of-silence
#10 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Sun 20 Feb 2011 at 10:55 PM