Ah, labels. They’re good for summing up large, complex populations with a snazzy phrase and reducing people’s lives to an anachronistic prop.
Enter the lunch bucket.
Since Barack Obama chose Joe Biden to be his running mate, this charming term has taken center stage.
“In Biden, Obama chooses a lunch-bucket Democrat with deep foreign policy experience,” proclaimed The Boston Globe.
“Biden is a lunch-bucket Democrat,” wrote David Brooks in the Times last week. And so on.
Once upon a time, a lunch-bucket voter is one who works at a construction or factory job and totes along his or her afternoon meal in a pail of sorts. It’s a cute way of saying “blue-collar.”
But just days before Biden and the Bucket burst on the scene, The Press Democrat reported that the ranks of the Buckateers have grown since the economy has taken a downturn.
With white-collar workers—bankers and paralegals according the Democrat—taking up their buckets, the designation becomes more expansive, and less useful for condescending to a huge segment of the population.
And another thing: who has a lunch bucket nowadays? Does Tupperware voter just not have the right ring to it?




Recent Comments
-
Robin Wauters on
General Motors and a Newspaper “Classic”
(2)
-
Bob Gardner on
Brauchli On WaPo Salons
(1)
-
Anna Haynes on
NSF “Underwriting” Coverage…
(4)
-
John Stewart Mills on
Three Strikes and You're Fired
(8)
-
I.G. Noble on
Washington Post All Access Fire Sale!
(1)
-
James on
More PitneyGate Fallout?
(1)
-
susannahvila on
In (Partial) Defense of Connie Schultz
(1)
-
Colt_Industries on
Remember Moldova
(2)
More