“Is there any limit to the shamelessness of NBC News?” Charles Kaiser asked here on Monday, in expressing, er, dissatisfaction with NBC News’s seeming non-reaction to (“stunning wall of silence”) David Barstow’s reporting for the New York Times (both Sunday’s piece and the one from April) on the conflicted military analysts of network news (like NBC’s Gen. Barry McCaffrey).
But, as Salon’s Glenn Greenwald reported, Barstow’s articles have set off a flurry of activity behind the scenes at NBC News. Greenwald “obtained, from a very trustworthy source, emails sent last week between NBC News executives and [its military analyst, retired Gen. Barry] McCaffrey (which cc:d Brian Williams), reflecting the extensive collaboration between NBC and McCaffrey to formulate a coordinated response to David Barstow’s story.”
Nothing shocking about a giant corporation going into crisis management coordination mode in reaction to some, um, bad press. What is perhaps shocking (or, “disturbing,” “disheartening”)?
Take it away, Cocktailhag (a commenter on Greenwald’s posts at Salon, flagged by Greenwald):
The disturbing tactics NBC has chosen here are tactics NBC e are probably the most disheartening aspect of the NYT’s disclosures about McCaffrey. Taking a page from the crooked playbook of both Nixon and Rove, we have a supposed NEWS organization attacking its critics’ patriotism, covering itself in faux “Americanism,” dragging out irrelevant and stale honors of the culprit, avoiding the real issue, and utterly stonewalling any inquiry into the matter.This is the exact behavior a nominally free press ought to deplore as a matter of principle, but obviously the network sees itself as an infallible, untouchable, and superior entity, just as far above reproach by the rabble as the political, military, and economic elites it “covers.”

Cocktailhag always salutes when s/he's commenting, by the way. (Don't ask me how I know this)
My favorite was when I criticized Williams on his blog (I used the 'nym Nequals1 there), and he responded in a fury that he believed I was calling him a Nazi. Project much, Mr. Williams? However, 1930s Germany seems ever so much more culturally aligned with the US corporate news machine, ja wold?
Not long after, he or his editor stopped publishing my comments critical of NBC's refusal to disclose actual and potential conflicts of interest.
Posted by Annie on Wed 3 Dec 2008 at 05:54 PM
There is a slight typographical error in the first portion of this sentence, but I nonetheless applaud your attention to this matter, which reflects that some journalists see a problem with NBC.
Posted by Cocktailhag on Thu 4 Dec 2008 at 04:17 PM
Lest we forget (did NBC?), McCaffrey's been in the news before -
"... In 2000, President Clinton's drug czar, Barry McCaffrey, secretly paid television networks to propagandize its antidrug message. The scripts of "ER"(NBC), "Chicago Hope"(CBS), "Beverly Hills 90210"(FOX) and other programs were altered to include antidrug messages. In return for changing scripts, the networks were allowed to sell to higher-paying advertisers advertising time that had been promised to the government"
- from a story on Armstrong Williams in the WSJ at
http://preview.tinyurl.com/6owh9v
(I added in the networks, from Wipedia)
Posted by Anna Haynes on Thu 4 Dec 2008 at 04:41 PM
Oops, the full story (Prime-time propaganda) was in Salon.
(there's a link to it from McCaffrey's Wikipedia page)
Posted by Anna Haynes on Thu 4 Dec 2008 at 05:15 PM