McClatchy—one of the few major news outlets that demonstrated skepticism about now-discredited intelligence reports during the run-up to the Iraq war—turned in, yesterday, another commendable example of skeptical political reporting. This one, a systematic fact-check of Dick Cheney’s speech on torture enhanced interrogation techniques. Kudos to Jonathan Landay and Warren Strobel for a solid and valuable piece, and here’s hoping that their fellow Washington reporters will follow their critical—in every sense—example.
The Kicker — May 22, 2009 02:05 PM
McClatchy Fact-Checks Cheney
By Megan Garber
Subscribe to the Columbia Journalism Review at our special Web rates.
—advertisement—
Desks
The Audit Business
- The private-equity problem with Romney and GS Technologies Loading up a company with debt to ensure Bain’s own profits
- Sorkin’s Glass-Steagall straw man Of course its repeal contributed, directly and indirectly, to the financial crisis
The Observatory Science
- Evolved for exhibitionism? Wired column makes weak claims about human behavior, psychology
- Reparative journalism Reporter sinks a controversial paper on “ex-gay” therapy
Campaign Desk Politics & Policy
- When a ‘birther’ story comes knocking After congressman’s comments, a Denver TV station doesn’t let go
- Herald’s Caputo dives deep on diverging polls Do other news organizations undermine their credibility when they don’t do the same?
Behind the News The Media
Blog
The Kicker last updated: Fri 11:09 AM
- David Simon, creator of The Wire and Treme, on the Times-Picayune cuts
- The Times-Picayune cuts staff and print runs
- Broadcasters sue to keep political ad buy data offline
- The Pulitzer Prize luncheon, storified
- A game of telephone fools the Times
The Future of Media
News Startups Guide last updated: Wed 2:13 PM
- Missouri Scout Subscription-based niche political news from a stockbroker turned political junkie
- Eye on Annapolis Unadorned, up-to-the-minute news for Maryland’s capital city
Rather than being a "solid and valuable piece" this was a poorly executed partisan hack job.
Find someone who disagrees with Cheney and their viewpoint is fact? Are you serious?
The sad fact i that many Washington reporters will follow this exact strategy to justify their own biased view rather than engaging in any serious fact-checking.
#1 Posted by Joe Zekas, CJR on Fri 22 May 2009 at 08:04 PM
Cheney is just trying to protect his awfull legecy. He is nothing more than a pimple on the _ _ s of progress. Cheney, Palin, Limbaugh what a lineup. They think that that group will win back their power after such a dismal last 8 years. At least Bush has brains enough to keep his mouth shut.
#2 Posted by Paul Ehrhard, CJR on Fri 22 May 2009 at 11:41 PM