The public debate over the situation in Afghanistan, which had already been fairly robust, may get a little wilder after Peter Galbraith’s scathing op-ed in Sunday’s Washington Post. The piece, by the recently-fired United Nations deputy for the region, brought a simmering feud over how the UN has responded to allegations of electoral fraud into full public view.
In addition to pinning a target on the UN, Galbraith’s piece will surely attract more media attention to the question of whether the United States should send more troops overseas. Galbraith did not quite take a stance on that question in the op-ed, but in his interview with Diane Sawyer this morning he advised against a “surge,” and said the situation in Afghanistan was more akin to Vietnam than Iraq. (He also advised against withdrawal.) With TV outlets devoting more time to Afghanistan, it’ll be interesting to see how prominently Galbraith’s views are featured in the emerging media narrative.



Recent Comments
-
Coatney smith on
Chicago police respect public’s right to record
(1)
-
Wertman smith on
David Simon, creator of The Wire and Treme, on the Times-Picayune cuts
(16)
-
fdasfdsa on
Evolved for exhibitionism?
(1)
-
fdasfdsa on
The private-equity problem with Romney and GS Technologies
(1)
-
fdasfdsa on
When a 'birther' story comes knocking
(1)
-
fdasfdsa on
The Kickstarter Chronicles
(1)
-
Jon Ber on
Murdoch may sell his British papers
(2)
-
Dan A. on
Darts and Laurels
(2)
More