In the kind of gut-reaction age in which Octavia Nasr and Rick Sanchez were given the boot for speaking their minds (unwisely perhaps), it’s unsurprising that NPR has ended its contract with Juan Williams after controversial remarks he made on The O’Reilly Factor Monday night. But that doesn’t make it right.
NPR recounts the O’Reilly comments as follows:
O’Reilly has been looking for support for his own remarks on a recent episode of ABC’s The View in which he directly blamed Muslims for the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. Co-hosts Joy Behar and Whoopi Goldberg walked off the set in the middle of his appearance.
Williams responded: “Look, Bill, I’m not a bigot. You know the kind of books I’ve written about the civil rights movement in this country. But when I get on the plane, I got to tell you, if I see people who are in Muslim garb and I think, you know, they are identifying themselves first and foremost as Muslims, I get worried. I get nervous.”
Williams also warned O’Reilly against blaming all Muslims for “extremists,” saying Christians shouldn’t be blamed for Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh.
That caveat was not enough to save Williams.
Late Wednesday night, NPR issued a statement praising Williams as a valuable contributor but saying it had given him notice that it is severing his contract. “His remarks on The O’Reilly Factor this past Monday were inconsistent with our editorial standards and practices, and undermined his credibility as a news analyst with NPR,” the statement read.
Brian Stelter at the Times further reports on past comments from NPR’s ombudsman Alica C. Shepard regarding Williams’s O’Reilly appearances.
Mr. Williams’s contributions on Fox raised eyebrows at NPR in the past. In February 2009, NPR said it had asked that he stop being identified on “The O’Reilly Factor” as a “senior correspondent for NPR,” even though that title was accurate.
Alicia C. Shepard, the NPR ombudswoman, said at the time that Mr. Williams was a “lightning rod” for the public radio organization in part because he “tends to speak one way on NPR and another on Fox.”
Ms. Shepard said she had received 378 listener e-mails in 2008 listing complaints and frustrations about Mr. Williams.
This was a strange arrangement to begin with; Fox and NPR are hardly natural bedfellows and the tenor of debate on each outlet is vastly different. So says Captain Obvious.
The question going through my mind this morning is why NPR held on to Williams if he had proved too much of a “lightning rod” in the past, or, alternatively, why they had not come to some sort of agreement that would keep him off the FNC.
Regardless, like other recent firings, the message sent out by the Williams episode is plainly the wrong one. The public radio giant is revered as one of the country’s few outlets for civil, orderly discourse—Williams’s comments would have provided the perfect opportunity to open a discussion with him and others about Islamaphobia in America. The kind of discussion you could never have with O’Reilly, or on The View, where two hosts walked out on O’Reilly in the incident that precipitated the line of questioning that got Williams in so much trouble. It’s now an opportunity squandered. Say something off-key, and you’re silenced. Expect that from CNN, but we thought better of NPR.

Good for NPR, Juan Williams slant belongs to "Fake News" with the rest of the failed political candidstes Palin, Huckabee, or should I say the 2012 GOP Presidential contenders. They are not racist they are just the good old boys. They are the bunch that keep saying that everyong should be scared of BLACKS, scared of ASIANS, sacred of LATINOS, scared of WOMEN, scared of the GAYS and now they are scared of Muslims. So long Johnny,don't let the door hit you. I love that you went crying to "Fake News" and played the victim card, I guess its another "it is a high-tech lynching".
#1 Posted by Montana, CJR on Thu 21 Oct 2010 at 05:25 PM
Williams was silenced? It seems to me he can walk up to pretty much any microphone in the nation, say what he wants, and have it be on the evening news. We should all be lucky enough to be that "silenced".
And that's before mention of his new $2 million Fox contract. There's a lesson for the nation - "Say something stupid and bigoted and you too have a shot at winning the Rupert Murdoch 'Fair and Balanced' lottery!"
What is your position on the firings of Helen Thomas, Octavia Nasr and Rick Sanchez? I think a good case can be made that Williams should not have been fired, but I'm curious about your consistency on this issue. (I don't find, "If he weren't fired, his network could have debated the issue of whether all Muslims really are scary", to be particularly compelling, though. They can do that anyway, not that it would be a particularly interesting discussion.)
#2 Posted by Aaron, CJR on Thu 21 Oct 2010 at 05:36 PM
Any time someone says "I'm not a bigot ... but" you can be sure the next words they speak will be a bigoted statement for which they don't want to be called out. Suppose someone else said, "I'm not a bigot, but I'm really uncomfortable that the major media are controlled by Jews"? C'mon, folks, this guy has been living off his early work for more than a decade, and he's made any number of questionable comments during his FNC appearances. If you lie down with Bill-O and Faux News, you're going to attract a lot of fleas, and NPR must have gotten tired of spending so much on powder and ointment. Don't cry for him, CJR.
#3 Posted by BillNRoc, CJR on Thu 21 Oct 2010 at 06:42 PM
"I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community. I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother - a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe. These people are a part of me. And they are a part of America, this country that I love."
- Barack Obama, March 18, 2008
This passage, from President Obama's now famous speech on race during the presidential campaign, was a refreshingly candid moment in American politics and is quite similar to the sentiments expressed by Juan Williams. The president's grandmother admitted an obviously irrational, though probably visceral fear of black men and others. Williams was doing much the same except it was about Muslims, and like the president, went on to suggest that while these feelings shouldn't be embraced, they could not be ignored either. The truth is that we all feel things we shouldn't. It's in our nature. The trick is figuring out a way to deal with these feelings responsibly, in a way that doesn't hurt others. Burying them doesn't accomplish this. In fact, when NPR suggests that Williams should have buried these feelings they are probably doing more harm than those who truly and openly support anti-Muslim bias.
#4 Posted by Michael Schreiber, CJR on Thu 21 Oct 2010 at 10:35 PM
BEING biased is mandatory....
ADMITTING bias is unforgivable...
#5 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Fri 22 Oct 2010 at 07:33 AM
NPR has been leaning so far to the left over the past few years that I finally found it very hard to take any of what was said seriously except for a few good reporters. Jaun Williams was one of them. I didn't always agree with him. Juan Williams spoke truthfully and with a keen eye towards seeking the truth. What a huge mistake on the part of NPR. It shows how leftist the station has become with the likes of Weiss and Schiller who are basically lap dogs for the socialist that are trying to take over this country. I know about them because that's all I heard at college 40 years ago. These young punks from back then have really screwed this country up.Fair and balanced news reporting from NPR? I don't think so. Every African American ought to be outraged and see the left for what it is and know that leftist doctrine and African American rights should never mix.Who liberated the Black man anyway. Wasn't it Republicans? Liberals want to keep African Americans in their government 'dependency' diapers and do not want them to become truly liberated. Big government and unions want them to be dependent on them. That's how it works with these organizations. That's where they get their power. Then they give you crumbs and tell you how happy you should be for the 'gift'. The NAACP is in this mix also. Lost it's focus and will lose their base over time.Freedom is self made. It doesn't come from people who want to govern you.
#6 Posted by jack renoud, CJR on Fri 22 Oct 2010 at 08:30 AM
Check the political changes that have occurred through NPR, affiliates and top corporate positions, prior to Obama's administration. Then do some real checking into the political media strategy of the National Republican Committee. You may find that this popular reactive opinion towards NPR is exactly the desired results of the initial political media strategy. This strategy has been the gameplan for quite awhile, not just yesterday.
#7 Posted by llisa2u2, CJR on Fri 22 Oct 2010 at 05:26 PM
Jack, what shows were you listening to. I guess you find the opinion pieces by people like David Frum to be bleeding heart liberal claptrap? Or is it that there's a different NPR where you live?
What are the valuable insights you recall from his 'reporting' qua commentary?
#8 Posted by Aaron, CJR on Fri 22 Oct 2010 at 07:31 PM
"NPR has been leaning so far to the left over the past few years"? I have no clue what shows old Jack was listening to but there's a reason why NPR=Nice Polite Republicans.
Mara Liasson is the other NPR reporter who regularly appears on Fox News as a political reporter. NPR needs to address her work with Fox in light of Juan Williams' situation. She's been asked before to reconsider her work on Fox News but hasn't gotten the hint. She may not be as controversial as Williams but NPR has to address this. She either needs to be on NPR or Fox, not both.
#9 Posted by cab91, CJR on Mon 25 Oct 2010 at 08:43 AM
I've been wondering what "Muslim garb" is. I suppose he means the robes that Saudis and some other Arabs wear. Or does he mean the loose-fitting shirts and pants that Afghans and Pakistanis wear? Or does he mean the regular suits that most Muslim business people the world over wear? The 9/11 attackers were wearing what most American men would wear on planes. This all makes no sense to me.
#10 Posted by CAROL HARPER, CJR on Mon 25 Oct 2010 at 11:43 AM
I've been wondering what "Muslim garb" is. I suppose he means the robes that Saudis and some other Arabs wear. Or does he mean the loose-fitting shirts and pants that Afghans and Pakistanis wear? Or does he mean the regular suits that most Muslim business people the world over wear? The 9/11 attackers were wearing what most American men would wear on planes. This all makes no sense to me.
#11 Posted by CAROL HARPER, CJR on Mon 25 Oct 2010 at 11:51 AM