Obama defended (dialed-back? clarified?) his McCain’s for a 100-years-war statement on the Today Show this morning (hat tip, Michael Calderone):
Meredith Vieira: Senator, both you and Senator Clinton have said that Senator McCain favors 100 more years of war in Iraq. Well on Sunday, Frank Rich wrote, “Really, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton should be ashamed of themselves for libeling John McCain.” That in fact Sen. McCain never said he wanted another 100 years of war, he just said he felt American troops should be a long-term presence they way they are in Japan and South Korea. Are willing to admit you’ve distorted his statements?”Obama: That’s just not accurate, Meredith. We can pull up the quotes on YouTube. What John McCain was saying was, that he is happy to have a potential, long-term occupation in Iraq. Happy may be overstating it. He is willing to have a long-term occupation of Iraq—as long as a hundred years. In fact, he said, 10,000 years. However long it took. That was his argument. The problem is that there’s no end in sight because John McCain has not offered any clear point at which he suggests its time for us to move our troops home….



You guys really like this one, don't you. So why no pressure on McCain to clarify his remark?
Posted by Aaron
on Tue 8 Apr 2008 at 11:18 AM
McCain, is to put it bluntly, a warmonger. If he gets elected (may the deity of your choice help the world) the Middle East will explode. Just consider his "bomb bomb bomb Iran" ditty. If he's elected there will be zero hope for peace in the Middle East and he'll do his damnedest to ensure that his MIC friends get even wealthier off the blood of American soldiers and innocent foreign civilians. How long before he attacks Iran and turns that country into chaos, and after that Lebanon, Syria, and Libya? He has a viscous temper and whatever intelligence he once had has long disappeared. He's unstable and completely unfit for office.
Posted by Doug Alder
on Tue 8 Apr 2008 at 01:21 PM