According to a recent
Pew study, 15 percent of adults online use Twitter — 8 percent daily. I’m pretty sure most of that 8 percent are journalists. Journalists love Twitter, whether using it for writing, conversation, or fighting.
And I love to watch—and judge—the sparring.
If you see a #JournoTweetFight that you think merits inclusion, please give me a heads up @saramorrison.
Buzzfeed has never been one to pay much attention to copyright law. The site even posted an article on how to “navigate the treacherous waters of fair use” in today’s “remix culture.”
Another Buzzfeed staffer, Mark Duffy (who posts as “copyranter”) had his own take on the matter.
DECISION: @copyranter has no remorse. He’s also totally wrong. I doubt he’d admit it, but the fact that he went back and changed the post after several people complained indicates that something needed to be changed in the first place. His over-defensiveness in the face of reasonable and rational arguments from @jaredbkeller, @chrisboutet, @lexinyt, @joeptone, and @juliemmoos, while hugely entertaining, did little for his cause.
There are good questions to be asked about when aggregation or Buzzfeed’s “remixing” crosses the line into copyright theft or just bad journalistic etiquette. It’s hard to have that discussion when the person speaking for Buzzfeed doesn’t have the answers.
Nice how you failed to mention that NY Mag jacked several of those cover lines from twitter—but that's just fine and dandy, isn't it? Also The Daily Mail provided no link back, no mention, no nothing. I'm not going to hunt down all the jacks NY Mag did to me, but I'm not lying, there were MANY. I've been blogging for 8 years at my blogspot, but who gives a shit about an "amateur" blog?
Your view is so typical of the dying old-world journalism: Blogs = not real reporting.
Have a nice day.
#1 Posted by copyranter, CJR on Fri 26 Oct 2012 at 01:18 PM
Best part: this whole column is jacked from the reputed jackers' jacks.
Then the jack of all jacks gacks the comments with an irony-free flack-packed smackdown of the "dying old world journalism" hacks, without one single fact at his back.
Seriously. Up I crack.
#2 Posted by Edward Ericson Jr., CJR on Fri 26 Oct 2012 at 05:04 PM
NY Mag didn't "jack" them from Twitter; it asked readers to submit suggestions, picked a few of them, and credited the author (unlike your post on Buzzfeed, which stripped those credits out).
Daily Mail did provide a mention in that article, but no link back.
NY Mag's Dan Amira asked you on Twitter to provide links to any and all instances of jacking your material; you have refused to do so. Accusations without proof are meaningless, be they from old-world journalists or "amateur" blogs. Even if NY Mag lifted your content, it doesn't give you the right to do the same.
Have a wonderful weekend!
#3 Posted by Sara Morrison, CJR on Fri 26 Oct 2012 at 05:05 PM
goin' back to Hackensack . . .
#4 Posted by Edward Ericson Jr., CJR on Fri 26 Oct 2012 at 05:09 PM