Why didn’t The New York Times’s “blockbuster” military analysts story get more traction? “Out of sight, out of mind” might have something to do with it. Studying approximately 1,300 stories from forty-eight different news outlets, the Project for Excellence in Journalism found only a couple of stories related to the military analysts investigation last week. Literally two.
Although there was some discussion of The Times scoop in the blogosphere, the Index found only two related stories in the week of April 21-27, both of them in the April 24 PBS NewsHour broadcast. In the cable news universe, where many of these analysts worked, silence greeted the story.

Too bad the analysts didn’t practice polygamy.




Recent Comments
-
Bob Gardner on
Brauchli On WaPo Salons
(1)
-
Anna Haynes on
NSF “Underwriting” Coverage…
(4)
-
John Stewart Mills on
Three Strikes and You're Fired
(8)
-
I.G. Noble on
Washington Post All Access Fire Sale!
(1)
-
James on
More PitneyGate Fallout?
(1)
-
susannahvila on
In (Partial) Defense of Connie Schultz
(1)
-
Colt_Industries on
Remember Moldova
(2)
-
Colt_Industries on
Talking Shop: Yvonne Wenger
(2)
More