The Washington Post’s Robert Samuelson today weighs in with an informed column on cultural changes affecting income inequality. His conclusion: it’s not necessarily bad and its roots are too complicated to do much about anyway. He also hopes the debate doesn’t devolve into an empty exercise in “class warfare.” The term bothers me because it’s invariably employed to head off any discussion of class at all. I don’t agree with any of it, but the piece is well worth reading.
The Kicker
12:27 PM - June 7, 2007
Samuelson says there’s nothing to be done
Warns to avoid “class warfare”
‘See you on the other side’ - Meet Jessica Lum, a terminally ill 25-year-old who chose to spend what little time she had practicing journalism
#Realtalk: This is the best moment to be in journalism - The old stuff isn’t coming back, but that’s okay
Streams of consciousness - Millennials expect a steady diet of quick-hit, social-media-mediated bits and bytes. What does that mean for journalism?
Sticking with the truth - How ‘balanced’ coverage helped sustain the bogus claim that childhood vaccines can cause autism
An ink-stained stretch - Can Aaron Kushner save the Orange County Register—and the newspaper industry?
This is the best moment to be in journalism (25)
The WSJ editorial page hits rock bottom (19)
The completist guide to Star Trek
Matt Yglesias watched every Star Trek movie and every episode of every TV show in the franchise
The uncomfortable questions not raised by Benghazi
The press and Congress are asking the wrong questions
Rob Ford in ‘crack cocaine’ video scandal
A video that appears to show Toronto’s mayor smoking crack is being shopped around by a group of Somali men involved in the drug trade
Why the underwear-bomber leak infuriated the Obama administration
The threat of even grander leaks
CJR's Guide to Online News Startups
Uptown Messenger – Hyperlocal news for a neighborhood in New Orleans
Who Owns What
The Business of Digital Journalism
A report from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism
Questions and exercises for journalism students.
It would be more interesting if Samuelson hadn't been writing essentially the same column over and over again for the last twenty years.
He takes Levy and Temin's interesting thesis about social norms and business practices having an effect on income inequality, passes it through his meat grinder of a mind, and concludes that market forces, not social norms, are the true drivers of inequality. Hence the proscription of "class warfare" thinking.
Robert Samuelson is the Leibniz of Economics. Everything is for the best in the best of all possible economies.
Posted by Cornelius Dribble
on Thu 7 Jun 2007 at 01:18 PM