Via Michael Calderone, in the wake of recent Spitzer (and Paterson) news, Crain’s New York Business polled New York voters and asked them, among other things:
“Do you think the press should report limited illegal drug use by a politician when they were much younger?”
The results:
In any circumstances: 40%
If they used heroin: 13%
If they used cocaine: 10%
If they used marijuana: 3%
None of these 39%
No response/Refused: 4%
Maybe Crain’s should have asked, “Do you think the press should run on the front page a piece about a politician’s apparently very limited illegal drug use (just a “bit part” in a “young life,” really)?





Recent Comments
-
Grammar Police on
Jumping to Confusion
(8)
-
Charles on
The Devil in the Details, Part II
(3)
-
Mike Holloway on
Sanjay Gupta on Cheating Death
(8)
-
Thimbles on
The State of Democratic Discourse, Part 952
(8)
-
Thimbles on
Unscientific America Meets Denialism
(3)
-
James Qwest on
A Bushel and a Beck
(12)
-
JLD on
Health Reform Lessons from Massachusetts, Part IX
(5)
-
Montana on
Nidal Malik Hasan
(61)
More