Via Michael Calderone, in the wake of recent Spitzer (and Paterson) news, Crain’s New York Business polled New York voters and asked them, among other things:
“Do you think the press should report limited illegal drug use by a politician when they were much younger?”
The results:
In any circumstances: 40%
If they used heroin: 13%
If they used cocaine: 10%
If they used marijuana: 3%
None of these 39%
No response/Refused: 4%
Maybe Crain’s should have asked, “Do you think the press should run on the front page a piece about a politician’s apparently very limited illegal drug use (just a “bit part” in a “young life,” really)?



Recent Comments
-
Adamgilly on
Reporters Are Sick of Iowa
(1)
-
Ian on
Somebody's Wrong on Citi
(1)
-
Cranky Dinosaur on
New Media, New Opportunities
(15)
-
anonymous on
Kakutani's a Poet...and, Oh, She Let Us Know It
(3)
-
maura on
WSJ on the Liver Merchants
(1)
-
alfred brewer on
Access Uber Alles
(3)
-
Clayton Burns on
At Risk in Mexico
(1)
-
Annie on
Is This Where We Are?
(1)
More