Via Michael Calderone, in the wake of recent Spitzer (and Paterson) news, Crain’s New York Business polled New York voters and asked them, among other things:
“Do you think the press should report limited illegal drug use by a politician when they were much younger?”
The results:
In any circumstances: 40%
If they used heroin: 13%
If they used cocaine: 10%
If they used marijuana: 3%
None of these 39%
No response/Refused: 4%
Maybe Crain’s should have asked, “Do you think the press should run on the front page a piece about a politician’s apparently very limited illegal drug use (just a “bit part” in a “young life,” really)?





Recent Comments
-
stala on
Audit Notes: Hiltzik on Lehman, Regulator Bonuses, iPad Ads
(1)
-
shola on
The Big Money: Shoppers Beware
(5)
-
Thimbles on
Dumb Like a Fox
(97)
-
Seth Sicroff on
MIA on the IPCC
(91)
-
Amy Merrick on
WSJ on a New Municipal "Move Your Money" Push
(1)
-
greg marx on
The Education of Herb And Marion Sandler
(2)
-
Aaron B. on
An Icon Fades
(5)
-
Ryan Chittum on
Reuters Is Excellent in Digging Up a Health Insurer's Tactics
(4)
More