Via Michael Calderone, in the wake of recent Spitzer (and Paterson) news, Crain’s New York Business polled New York voters and asked them, among other things:
“Do you think the press should report limited illegal drug use by a politician when they were much younger?”
The results:
In any circumstances: 40%
If they used heroin: 13%
If they used cocaine: 10%
If they used marijuana: 3%
None of these 39%
No response/Refused: 4%
Maybe Crain’s should have asked, “Do you think the press should run on the front page a piece about a politician’s apparently very limited illegal drug use (just a “bit part” in a “young life,” really)?




Recent Comments
-
Osprey on
Pilgrims or Progress?
(1)
-
Anna Haynes on
NSF “Underwriting” Coverage…
(9)
-
edward ericson jr on
Amplifying the Drumbeat on the "Overdraft Protection" Racket
(1)
-
C. Chumley on
After Rohde
(6)
-
Bob Gardner on
Brauchli On WaPo Salons
(1)
-
John Stewart Mills on
Three Strikes and You're Fired
(9)
-
I.G. Noble on
Washington Post All Access Fire Sale!
(1)
-
James on
More PitneyGate Fallout?
(1)
More