Via Michael Calderone, in the wake of recent Spitzer (and Paterson) news, Crain’s New York Business polled New York voters and asked them, among other things:
“Do you think the press should report limited illegal drug use by a politician when they were much younger?”
The results:
In any circumstances: 40%
If they used heroin: 13%
If they used cocaine: 10%
If they used marijuana: 3%
None of these 39%
No response/Refused: 4%
Maybe Crain’s should have asked, “Do you think the press should run on the front page a piece about a politician’s apparently very limited illegal drug use (just a “bit part” in a “young life,” really)?





Recent Comments
-
Reverend Jesse Jackson on
Well, It May Deserve an Award in Something
(39)
-
kerja keras adalah energi kita on
Everybody's On Edge
(2)
-
robert elegant on
Not For All the News in China, Part I
(4)
-
Jordan Fogal on
LAT's Lazarus Alone Questions BofA Arbitration Move
(9)
-
Rick Brown on
What's a News Brief Worth?
(1)
-
Thimbles on
Strike a Pose—Rogue (Rogue, Rogue…)
(77)
-
JDS on
Popular Diplomacy
(12)
-
JSF on
Greg Craig and Transparency
(1)
More