OK, Barack Obama, a “suitcase bomb” doesn’t actually fit in a suitcase. It’s a figure of speech.
#Realtalk: This isn’t another ‘golden age’ for print - But it is one for media
Social media in smaller markets - How three social media managers deal with smaller markets and more local coverage.
A rally for laid-off Sun-Times photogs - A protest Thursday morning drew about 150 picketers to the newspaper’s headquarters
Reporting, or illegal hacking - Scripps reporters are accused of violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Exchange Watch: California Dreaming - Low healthcare premiums on the West Coast were trumpeted as a big, good-news Obamacare story. But: “Compared to what?”
One of the great reporters of his generation died Tuesday at 33. The stories he wrote, and the ones he didn’t live to write
Michael Hastings: my friend and his enemies
Hastings was fearless and shook things up - especially with his McChrystal expose. The haters in the media couldn’t forgive him
Journalism is about finding flaws and magnifying them, and surely someone who would spill massive loads of state secrets must contain a few broken parts, right?
Call it the Politico rhetorical crutch
The inside-the-beltway publication’s go-to phrase
Rachel Maddow’s tribute to Michael Hastings
“Michael was angry … he was angry about things that weren’t right in the world. He was angry with war and with loss, and that drove his reporting.”
CJR's Guide to Online News Startups
Uptown Messenger – Hyperlocal news for a neighborhood in New Orleans
Who Owns What
The Business of Digital Journalism
A report from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism
Questions and exercises for journalism students.

No it's not. There probably aren't any nuclear bombs that fit in a suitcase, but not for lack of trying. Both the US and the USSR built miniaturized weapons that were small enough to fit in (very) large backpacks. The US is rumored to have built a true suitcase bomb; though the veracity of this is debatable. You need nearly a critical mass of plutonium for a bomb and that's already fairly large relative to the size of suitcases.
However, if you don't need a real bomb, but only something that (weakly) blows itself up before full ignition yet spreads a great deal of lethal radiation around, that would be relatively easily achievable in a suitcase or even briefcase size.
At any rate, experts talk about "suitcase bombs" because theoretical ones might fit in a suitcase and actual ones almost will. It's not a figure of speech.
Posted by Keith M Ellis on Sat 27 Sep 2008 at 10:18 AM