So this piece has been making the rounds since Monday. It’s on op-ed in the Wall Street Journal by high school senior Suzy Lee Weiss waxing bitter about being rejected from college. She blamed her rejections (she doesn’t say how many, or whether she was accepted someplace) on the fact that she is a straight, white person with normal abilities and habits. It’s the most-read piece on the WSJ’s site and has been shared more than 10,500 times, according to the site Who Shared my Link.
Weiss writes:
Colleges tell you, “Just be yourself.” That is great advice, as long as yourself has nine extracurriculars, six leadership positions, three varsity sports, killer SAT scores and two moms. Then by all means, be yourself! If you work at a local pizza shop and are the slowest person on the cross-country team, consider taking your business elsewhere…
Show me to any closet, and I would’ve happily come out of it. “Diversity!” I offer about as much diversity as a saltine cracker. If it were up to me, I would’ve been any of the diversities: Navajo, Pacific Islander, anything. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, I salute you and your 1/32 Cherokee heritage.
Pity the well-off white girl who has not had to struggle with identity politics or face prejudice because of who she is (wait until she realizes the “real world” still has a glass ceiling). Blaming groups that lack the inherent privilege of caucasian heterosexuals for your own bad luck in a crapshoot is a gross distortion of affirmative action, which is imperfect but remains necessary, in some form, as long as historical inequities persist. And considering the Supreme Court was hearing gay marriage cases last week, persist they do.
Weiss’s own ability to relay her complaints so widely speaks to one of the other major factors influencing college admissions: connections. Weiss is the younger sibling of Bari Weiss, a Tablet editor and former assistant editorial page editor at—wait for it—the Wall Street Journal. The elder Weiss also, as a Columbia undergraduate, helped enflame tensions between Muslim and Jewish contingents after a group of Jewish students accused professors in the university’s Middle East Asian Languages and Cultures department of antisemitism. (She and I were in the same year at Columbia University but have never met.)
Of course, Bari Weiss can hold any opinions she likes; I mention her record of conservatism only to note that her sister may well share her views. If so, Suzy Lee Weiss may never regret her youthful contribution to her Google search results, one that eternally allows future employers and boyfriends to find her arguing against affirmative action and disdaining diversity. But there’s also a chance that her upcoming college education will net her exposure to an array of experiences and perspectives—that learning among students of different backgrounds could enrich her education.
In that scenario, Weiss’s op-ed will end up a recurring source of embarrassment to her. That’s why it was irresponsible of the Wall Street Journal’s conservative-leaning editorial page to run her piece, especially without helping her craft a more complex analysis of the flaws in the college admissions cycle. (Maybe WSJ editors did work with Weiss; a spokeswoman there said that they don’t publicly discuss their editorial process.) Weiss could have made a strong, poignant contribution to the admissions discussion as a high-school senior who just survived the process. Instead, a self described bitter, selfish teenager penned a piece that she may well regret as she matures into someone less egocentric.
If so, perhaps that regret will turn out to be, at long last, the hardship Weiss felt was missing from her life when she wrote her college essay—no need, for future applications, to “go to Africa, scoop up some suffering child, take a few pictures,” and then write about it. Too bad making one’s own adversity isn’t a salable talent.

"Of course, Bari Weiss can hold any opinions she likes; I mention her record of conservatism only to note that her sister may well share her views."
Why wildly speculate?
#1 Posted by B, CJR on Tue 2 Apr 2013 at 01:07 PM
My aunt sent me the WSJ article this morning. Reminds me of this article: http://www.bupipedream.com/opinion/10245/binghamtons-noble-truths-lived/
I agree that it's so easy to have a highly trafficked site pick up a story and let it go viral. It's kind of like reality TV...In the moment, these individuals feel a sense of fame, but it's really just a piece of gum on their digital footprint.
#2 Posted by Kenny Kane, CJR on Tue 2 Apr 2013 at 01:17 PM
Cant see how this would come back to haunt her .. after all didnt Columbia university just hire domestic terrorist Kathy Boudin? Her background of murder didnt seem to be much of a stain on her record.
#3 Posted by Mike H, CJR on Tue 2 Apr 2013 at 02:13 PM
--She blamed her rejections (she doesn’t say how many, or whether she was accepted someplace) on the fact that she is a straight, white person with normal abilities and habits.
The video does detail that she was accepted.
It seems that she felt burned by the "brand" rejections.
There are many problems with the Ivy League colleges that should be addressed because of the potential to change the systems of admission for American colleges by starting with Harvard and Columbia.
(CJR could have a higher education-high school columnist, who, unlike the EWA and The Choice, would comment tenaciously on fundamentals).
What Harvard needs to do is to have a formal admissions curriculum with no standardized multiple choice tests. Students should be chosen based on performance in written and oral tests (my own preference would be that there be no concession to any factors except for academic excellence).
Rather mysteriously, despite the excellent performance of its press, Harvard was relying on the SAT the last time I looked. That is barbaric. If students can perform well on Helen Vendler's "Dickinson: Selected Poems and Commentaries" (a Harvard professor and a Harvard book), then they should have a chance at admission. I have no interest in an SAT score. I laugh it to scorn. Vendler's "Dickinson" should be a central, required text for a national college admissions curriculum.
In the state of Massachusetts, there should be an association of colleges offering summer courses for high school students in an organized and accredited way, for example Dickinson at Harvard and Amherst College and Phonetics, Phonology, and the sound systems of poetry at UMass Amherst. There should be scholarships for promising students anywhere in the US who could take two-month summer programs there at the ends of grades 10-12 for college prep that would not involve any SAT trash.
These courses would have to take latency seriously. For example, teaching Shakespeare first by doing the Oxford School Shakespeare "Romeo and Juliet," "Macbeth," and "Hamlet," and then by doing the exact same plays in the brilliant new Ardens.
The President of the United States should break the admissions favoritism that comes from connections. No federal money should go to colleges that bend admissions illicitly to favor anyone at all. This activity should be criminalized.
If you compare the comment with the associated video, a clearer picture emerges. The truth is that admissions to American colleges cannot be reformed by tinkering with current practices. It is a stupid rat race and students should be angry about it.
#4 Posted by Clayton Burns, CJR on Tue 2 Apr 2013 at 03:24 PM
Sorry for the double post. The way of posting comments here is not good.
Kira, You simply did not do the information cycle. The WSJ Mary Kissel video interview makes it clear that the student did fine at the Big Ten, but not at the "name-brand" colleges.
I found the references to tiger moms in the video interesting, because they are often interfering, incapable, and obnoxious.
Frankly, you over reacted, and I do not believe in guilt by association either.
I have helped a lot of students with American college admissions, and turned down a lot who expected me to write their essays.
The system is hectic and absurd. No wonder so many students are on dope trying to adapt.
Vendler's "Dickinson" is fully indicative. How can colleges be pushing Vendler aside in favor of SAT manuals unless there is an element of dogged stupidity involved? Despite the power of this book, its reading of Dickinson's greatest lyric--perhaps the greatest in English--"It was not Death, for I stood up," is badly out of focus. Not only does nobody notice because of the hectic distraction built into American college life, Vendler herself declines to respond to e-mail about the errors in her reading.
It is ridiculous. It is all just too ridiculous. The President of the United States has the duty to set up a functioning commission of inquiry into American college admissions practices, one that would engage with the facts and produce powerful, mandatory solutions.
#5 Posted by Clayton Burns, CJR on Tue 2 Apr 2013 at 04:03 PM
shorter column- Kira hates conservatives and has no sense of humor.
#6 Posted by sbp, CJR on Tue 2 Apr 2013 at 04:26 PM
Affirmative action - the lefts justification for practicing bigotry and hatred.
#7 Posted by DADvocate, CJR on Tue 2 Apr 2013 at 04:32 PM
Even the mildest of Ms. Goldenberg's distortions here are more "embarrass[ing]" and "regret[ful]" than the worst of Ms. Weiss' alleged offenses. Too bad Ms. G opted to personally, fraudulently attack Ms. W instead of tepidly, honestly challenging her arguments. Vicious. Wheels-off. "Journalism."
#8 Posted by Dan A., CJR on Tue 2 Apr 2013 at 04:33 PM
Sarchasm: the gap between a writer's use of subtle humor and the comprehension level of the reader.
I think this term is appropriate here, given the tone of the above response. As is this one: overreaction.
#9 Posted by gert, CJR on Tue 2 Apr 2013 at 04:42 PM
Of course, Bari Weiss can hold any opinions she likes; I mention her record of conservatism only to note that her sister may well share her views. If so, Suzy Lee Weiss may never regret her youthful contribution to her Google search results, one that eternally allows future employers and boyfriends to find her arguing against affirmative action and disdaining diversity.
Shorter Kira Goldenberg: Be careful what you say, the rest of you conservative scum, or else we, your Betters, will eternally blacklist you.
#10 Posted by Herp McDerp, CJR on Tue 2 Apr 2013 at 05:44 PM
I don't know how old the author of this piece is, but I would venture that Suzy Weiss has far better life prospects. Why? She has a sense of humor.
#11 Posted by Bill M., CJR on Tue 2 Apr 2013 at 07:15 PM
She does make some valid points....but not many. I agree with the point that "affirmative action" has in a sense turned into reverse racism. This past year I went to several graduate school recruitment weekends and its difficult to not be cynical when you're rejected by a place that you could recall be 1 of the 10 white kids out of 50-60 people, and when you can count on your hand the number of white students in their student body, AND when they boast of being an institution that grants some of the highest numbers of underrepresented/minority degrees. Admissions decisions should be based solely on MERIT. We have the technology capabilities to assign numbers to applications so that we don't know a race or gender. While you can argue that this girl was just a self entitled white girl why should we pity her? Why should you pity the person who lived a hard life. At 18 years old the lives that were dealt to these students were out of their control. Its not one students fault their mother is a drug addict nor is it the fault of another students that their mother went to college and is a successful lawyer. We also don't get to pick our race. So why should anybody be punished or rewarded for the things they CANT CONTROL!! I do believe you need to be exceptional to go to a place like Harvard- so I think this student misses the boat when she says "Normal" people should be accepted. you need to be ACADEMICALLY deserving.
#12 Posted by Em, CJR on Tue 2 Apr 2013 at 07:58 PM
And future employers Googling "Kira Goldenberg" will forever find that she's mean-spirited and condescending, and avoid hiring someone who will sow discord n their organization....
#13 Posted by CJ, CJR on Tue 2 Apr 2013 at 08:47 PM
Kira Goldenberg should splurge, and buy a sense of humor. That way, other op-eds won't go completely over her head like this one clearly did. She just completely missed the point.
#14 Posted by Justin, CJR on Tue 2 Apr 2013 at 09:55 PM
Adding my voice to the prior commenters noting that it seems like Ms Goldenberg misread this clearly self-deprecating, comedic piece. The final paragraph again:
---
To those claiming that I am bitter—you bet I am! An underachieving selfish teenager making excuses for her own failures? That too! To those of you disgusted by this, shocked that I take for granted the wonderful gifts I have been afforded, I say shhhh—"The Real Housewives" is on.
---
What is irresponsible is to tarnish the name of a high schooler without even being the slightest bit careful about the facts.
#15 Posted by Cr, CJR on Tue 2 Apr 2013 at 10:14 PM
This piece sounds even more bitter than Weiss' opinion. How it broke down into plain dirt digging, mud slinging on the Weiss family so quickly !
Maybe Weiss was right. I can't believe guilt association is the best rebuttal a Columbia grad can offer. Maybe Ivy League is indeed for the privileged and people do spend lots of dollars to take care of homeless' pets just to burnish their resumes.
#16 Posted by Rajiv, CJR on Wed 3 Apr 2013 at 12:08 AM
Goldenberg: "Suzy Lee Weiss may never regret her youthful contribution to her Google search results, one that eternally allows future employers and boyfriends to find her arguing against affirmative action and disdaining diversity."
Yes, I'm sure Ms. Weiss really appreciates your concern for her future, with your soft McCarthyism: Embrace our political views or suffer the consequences.
Any employer who would reject an applicant for her conservative political views isn't worth working for anyway.
Evidently Ms. Goldenberg thinks that private corporations are like liberal-arts universities, with tremendous peer pressure to act liberal or engage in radical chic. I worked in private corporations for decades, and that's not what I found at all.
Ms. Goldenberg's assumptions that employers and even boyfriends will reject a woman for having conservative political views, speaks volumes about Goldenberg and her own circle of friends. I'll bet that they're the ones doing the rejecting.
#17 Posted by Steven L. (Columbia U. class of 1975), CJR on Wed 3 Apr 2013 at 09:33 AM
Kira Goldberg reminds me of the women that interviewed me (white male) for a position at a University. Five women of them seated around a table asking me "What do you think of Diversity?".
I know I was the only straight white male on the floor. Prob in the entire building.
Huge blind spots. Just huge.
#18 Posted by Fen, CJR on Wed 3 Apr 2013 at 09:59 AM
This article is a terrific example of the Anais Nin quote, "We don't see things as they are, we see them as we are."
The author reads a lightly sardonic, self-mocking look at the college admissions process and it evokes the response of a Stalinist commissar in a panting search for political deviation.
#19 Posted by Joe Y., CJR on Wed 3 Apr 2013 at 10:29 AM
I do have to congratulate Kira on her energy. Stone dead education reporters do not do much good.
The American higher education file is in cardiac arrest. Has been. And will be. Unless new measures...
What I suggest is that CJR take two steps: appoint Kira as the CJR Higher Education Columnist for a year to see how it works out, and have her lead a CJR Education Blog. (Anyone wanting to comment would have to identify herself. No exceptions.)
The New York Times's education coverage, as chaotic and unimaginative as it can be, is more important than all the other such coverage in the country put together because there is far more evidence being presented in the paper (as today) so that we are forced to collate and think hard.
Kira should engage in minute daily analysis of NYT coverage of education. There are many obvious lapses besides the frequent enlightening coverage. For one, will there ever be any understanding of latency opportunity costs? When we eat out of the garbage--studying SAT manuals, for example--we lose valuable time we need to apply to Emily Dickinson.
The EWA is not functioning. It is lazy and bureaucratic. It has a clunkier website than CJR, something of an achievement.
#20 Posted by Clayton Burns, CJR on Wed 3 Apr 2013 at 02:07 PM
being a hater of PC & affirmative action is no barrier to a lucrative career. It made Dinesh D'Souza into a "scholar" &--for a while at least--college president.
Our young correspondent knows what she's doing.
#21 Posted by Edward Ericson Jr., CJR on Wed 3 Apr 2013 at 03:44 PM
I don't disagree with anything you said, although I was surprised to read that her "normal abilities and habits" include a 4.5 GPA and a 2120 SAT score. I think she'll be fine at any number of other great schools.
#22 Posted by kenneth, CJR on Thu 4 Apr 2013 at 06:37 PM
great journalism! "Bari Weiss can hold any opinions she likes; I mention her record of conservatism only to note that her sister may well share her views." Is this article about her or her sister? What does Ms. Goldenberg's sister think? What kind of logic, or journalism, is Ms. Goldenberg representing? Pathetic.
#23 Posted by joe, CJR on Thu 4 Apr 2013 at 09:40 PM
Yet perhaps the biggest irony in Weiss’ case is that although she may have failed to have landed a slot with an ivy league institution her gumption to do something that most candidates would never have thought to do (the very same qualities that ivy league institutions make a point of looking for) helped her gain entry into Pennsylvania State, Indiana, Michigan and Wisconsin—not Ivy Leagues but still prestigious. That plus
receiving job and internship offers.
Nevertheless her letter is a disquieting reflection on the state of affairs of what it actually takes to get ahead in America these days...
http://scallywagandvagabond.com/2013/04/suzy-lee-weiss-ivy-league-letter-causes-america-to-reflect-on-the-misery-of-getting-ahead/
#24 Posted by scallywag, CJR on Fri 5 Apr 2013 at 09:29 AM
Ms. Goldenberg would make an excellent Witchfinder General. We must find her a woolen wig and a long black robe.
#25 Posted by Mary, CJR on Sat 6 Apr 2013 at 03:09 PM
I cannot think of any straight guy on this or any other planet who would dump a girl because she is too conservative, especially if she is hot. On a more serious note, didn't Ron Unz do a more complex analysis of the admission process at HYP and found that it is basically rigged against Asians. If this is the case, the mocking tone of Weiss's piece is totally appropriate. I was not even close to getting into any elite college but my uncle is a moron so that must be why, right Kira.
#26 Posted by mark, CJR on Sat 6 Apr 2013 at 03:33 PM
"I cannot think of any straight guy on this or any other planet who would dump a girl because she is too conservative, especially if she is hot"
Had a lot of experience with both sides of the aisle. Though there are hot women on both sides, conservative women are, on average, much more attractive than liberal women. In fairness, that's primarily because unattractive women tend to fall almost exclusively into the liberal camp. I'm not sure why, but that's definitely been my experience. Being conservative (assuming she is)is not going to harm Weiss with guys, though it's interesting Kira thinks it might.
Regardless, I don't see Weiss regretting this article. Ever.
#27 Posted by J1, CJR on Sat 6 Apr 2013 at 07:14 PM
Screw college kids, be a superhero like Batman.
#28 Posted by Bruce Wayne, CJR on Thu 11 Apr 2013 at 03:52 PM
Interesting selection of comments there. What a shame that the apparently humorless cultural commissars of correctness from the political right completely missed the delicately self-mocking and satirical tone of Ms. Goldenberg's piece. Apparently it went right over their heads.
Incidentally, I completely agree that the WSJ op/ed in question is most unlikely to be a source of discomfort down the road - either Ms. Weiss is an engaging, humorous individual (possible, of course) or an annoying, petulant, entitled young woman (also possible, of course). Either way, this column will hardly be a source of difficulties for her.
#29 Posted by JohnR, CJR on Fri 12 Apr 2013 at 01:26 PM
FYI... her sister is an assistant editor at the Wall Street Journal. Otherwise, this snotty, unspectacular letter would be showing up on her best friends' blog, not a national newspaper. (Way to take advantage of your "connections," Suzy... Nice to know SOME things still aren't based on merit!)
#30 Posted by John, CJR on Sun 7 Jul 2013 at 02:37 PM