For AJR, Paul Farhi explores the present and future of campaign trail reporting:
Michael Shear, who will cover the Obama White House for the Washington Post, calls the general drift [away from the campaign trail for reasons of cost and increasingly coy candidates] of the political press “pernicious”: “What we in daily journalism may be evolving to is covering [the candidates] purely by watching TV and listening to the pundits.”
Which actually might not be so different from being out on the trail, to hear Matt Bai (New York Times Magazine) describe it.
“I really couldn’t take the crossfire on the campaign bus,” says Bai, who met his wife, a Fox News producer, on the trail in 2000. “It gets pretty tiresome to hear reporters pontificating to each other about what the candidates are doing wrong. I just can’t stand it. It’s mostly people who haven’t [covered] a campaign before saying, ‘They’re spending their money wrong, the speech is wrong, he’s doing everything wrong.’… It’s like watching cable all day. It’s just noise.”


Recent Comments
-
Coatney smith on
Chicago police respect public’s right to record
(1)
-
Wertman smith on
David Simon, creator of The Wire and Treme, on the Times-Picayune cuts
(16)
-
fdasfdsa on
Evolved for exhibitionism?
(1)
-
fdasfdsa on
The private-equity problem with Romney and GS Technologies
(1)
-
fdasfdsa on
When a 'birther' story comes knocking
(1)
-
fdasfdsa on
The Kickstarter Chronicles
(1)
-
Jon Ber on
Murdoch may sell his British papers
(2)
-
Dan A. on
Darts and Laurels
(2)
More