Yesterday, my colleague Megan bemoaned the glut of “wishful thinking-” type contributions to The Future of News Conversation, calling for less pie-in-the-sky talk and “a little more action.” Wrote Megan:
No longer can we afford to fling fanciful funding-model proposals at the wall, hoping (though with little reason to do so) that a few errant strands might stick. Journalism’s future cannot be entrusted to spaghetti ingenuity.
And…. Maureen Dowd in today’s New York Times:
Why can’t Google, which likes to see itself as a “Don’t Be Evil” benevolent force in society, just write us a big check for our stories, so we can keep checks and balances alive and continue to provide the search engine with our stories?



Recent Comments
-
Coatney smith on
Chicago police respect public’s right to record
(1)
-
Wertman smith on
David Simon, creator of The Wire and Treme, on the Times-Picayune cuts
(16)
-
fdasfdsa on
Evolved for exhibitionism?
(1)
-
fdasfdsa on
The private-equity problem with Romney and GS Technologies
(1)
-
fdasfdsa on
When a 'birther' story comes knocking
(1)
-
fdasfdsa on
The Kickstarter Chronicles
(1)
-
Jon Ber on
Murdoch may sell his British papers
(2)
-
Dan A. on
Darts and Laurels
(2)
More