Yesterday, my colleague Megan bemoaned the glut of “wishful thinking-” type contributions to The Future of News Conversation, calling for less pie-in-the-sky talk and “a little more action.” Wrote Megan:

No longer can we afford to fling fanciful funding-model proposals at the wall, hoping (though with little reason to do so) that a few errant strands might stick. Journalism’s future cannot be entrusted to spaghetti ingenuity.

And…. Maureen Dowd in today’s New York Times:

Why can’t Google, which likes to see itself as a “Don’t Be Evil” benevolent force in society, just write us a big check for our stories, so we can keep checks and balances alive and continue to provide the search engine with our stories?
If you'd like to help CJR and win a chance at one of 10 free print subscriptions, take a brief survey for us here.

Liz Cox Barrett is a writer at CJR.