Dan Rather talking presidential debates at the Time Warner Media/Politics conference today (h/t Michael Calderone):

“First of all, these aren’t debates,” Rather said. “They are a ‘something,’ but they aren’t debates.”

Rather talked about the constricted format and that the two major political parties are the ones engineering them through the commission.

“These so-called debates are not by the people, for the people,” Rather said. “They are by the parties, for the parties.”

Meanwhile, Broadcasting & Cable asked the moderator of tomorrow night’s “something,” Bob Schieffer, what he would do if McCain and Obama spontaneously agreed, on-air tomorrow night, to junk the agreed-upon debate format and rules in order to try to have something resembling a debate? Said Schieffer:

You know what? If they did that, I would say ‘Gentlemen, have at it.’ I would lean back in my chair, and I would probably enjoy it more than anyone else. That would be the dream, wouldn’t it?

(I can think of someone else who might be in a position to spontaneously set aside restrictive debate rules. Live “the dream!”)

More promising words from Schieffer:

And if they try and get off track, I’m not going to be bashful about saying, ‘Gentlemen, that was not the question.’


These follow-up questions don’t have to be too complicated…

No answering a question other than the one posed! And, follow-ups! That would be something

If you'd like to get email from CJR writers and editors, add your email address to our newsletter roll and we'll be in touch.

Liz Cox Barrett is a writer at CJR.