This post is entirely trivial and nitpicky and superficial. On a related note, it involves Maureen Dowd’s latest column.
Discussing, this weekend, the dramatic complexities of the political bromance between Barack Obama and Joe Biden, Dowd noted,
Obama aides say the president went out of his way to stroke the vice president — who felt he helped interpret the exotic Obama for the hoi polloi during the campaign — by putting him in charge of a middle-class working families task force.
Still, the president should brush up on his Jane Austen. When Emma Woodhouse belittles Miss Bates, an older and poorer friend, at a picnic, Mr. Knightly pulls her aside to remonstrate. “How could you be so insolent in your wit?” he chides, reminding her that it is unfeeling to humble someone less fortunate in front of others who will be guided by the way she behaves.
A very astute and appropriate Canonical Literary Reference, to be sure—the kind Dowd is known for—but it would have been nice if Dowd herself had, you know, brushed up on her Jane Austen before making it.
It’s Mr. Knightley, Ms. Dowd, not Mr. Knightly.
Which is no big deal, in the scheme o f things…but, still, this is the Times, and that is Austen, and the correct spelling of the Emma protagonist’s name is, regardless, easily Google-able. If one is to be insolent in one’s wit, after all, one had better as well be correct.

It seems to me this is more likely to be the fault of a copy editor than the columnist herself. Firstly, it may be an error introduced in editing, and second, even if Dowd did drop the "e" from "Knightley", the NYT editorial team should catch things like that. John McPhee's encomium to fact checkers in the Feb. 9, 2009 New Yorker shows how indebted authors are to a good editorial team.
#1 Posted by Bioephemera, CJR on Mon 16 Feb 2009 at 05:53 PM
And it's not "hoi polloi" either. Why can't people just say "the polloi" -- is the hoi-polloi rhyme so compelling? Later, gator.
#2 Posted by MPJ, CJR on Tue 17 Feb 2009 at 10:40 AM
It's not "the hoi polloi" -- Muphry's Law.
#3 Posted by MPJ, CJR on Tue 17 Feb 2009 at 10:46 AM