Each week, dozens of journalistic endeavors turn to Kickstarter for funding. Pitching media projects to this online community brings another meaning to the concept “public interest journalism”; success depends on how intrigued people are by the pitch. From the hugely popular to the barely noticed, CJR’s Kickstarter Chronicles is a look through some of these journalistic proposals.
Just because you can’t see doesn’t mean you can’t be an athlete. Daphnee Denis discovered this when she saw a blind man pass her sighted friend in a marathon and has been interested in visually-impaired athletes ever since. She did her master’s project at Columbia’s Graduate School of Journalism about a blind triathlete, only to discover that he was also the captain of his local goalball team - a little-known sport for the visually impaired. Daphnee (who was my classmate at j-school) followed him to goalball practice and “I got completely obsessed with it,” she said.
So was classmate Hoda Emam, who was doing her master’s project on a home for the blind. Hoda and Daphnee ran into each other at a goalball practice and decided to film the sport together for their documentary class. “Shot in the Dark” was born.
The two spent the semester following and filming a New York City-based goalball team. When the semester was over and they received their diplomas, they decided to continue documenting the team’s story as it traveled to Salt Lake City for the Goalball National Championships last month. They’re hoping to raise at least $6,000 to cover those travel expenses, post-production costs, and festival entry fees. In an interesting take on rewards, backers who pledge at least $10 get “the best blind jokes the team has shared with us.” A successful campaign will be great for the filmmakers, of course, but it will also spread awareness of goalball and visually-impaired athletes - and that’s never a bad thing.
Deadline is August 11 at 1:01 p.m.
When Andréa Butler was a teenager, she noticed that there weren’t any magazines specifically targeted to young black woman like her. Things hadn’t gotten any better by the time she was done with college and graduate school, so she took matters into her own hands, starting Sesi Magazine in December 2009. From what I can tell from its site (Butler did not respond to interview requests), Sesi printed just three issues using an expensive print-on-demand service, the last coming out in summer 2010. The blog, though, is still regularly updated.
Butler wants $20,000 to be able to print high-quality, glossy issues for mass-market sales, distribute them, and build up enough of a readership to sell ads and keep Sesi going. It will also allow Butler to pay her contributors and graphic designers who have thus far worked in a volunteer capacity. The campaign is a longshot right now, with only three backers pledging $60 total, but there’s still plenty of time. Hopefully, Butler will get more aggressive about campaigning (and answering reporters’ questions
) soon and the void she saw in the marketplace so many years ago will be filled.
Deadline is August 17 at 7:36 p.m.

Hello,
Thank you for featuring our Kickstarter (Sesi magazine), however, I was disturbed to read in this article that you say I never responded to interview requests and that "hopefully [I] will get more agressive about ...answering reporters' questions..." as I never received any such request. There was never any phone all/voice mail or e-mail sent to me. Please let me know how you were trying to reach me because it did not go through. Thank you.
#1 Posted by Sesimag, CJR on Fri 27 Jul 2012 at 10:23 PM
Hello,
I tried to contact you via two different Facebook accounts a few days before the article was published but received no response. I'm not sure what happened there.
Regardless, I think Sesi Magazine is a worthy cause and I wish you luck with your campaign.
#2 Posted by Sara Morrison, CJR on Tue 31 Jul 2012 at 09:27 AM
@Sara
So what, we have disappearing articles now at Pravda... er, I mean CJR?
Here we go down the Memory Hole!....
#3 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Tue 31 Jul 2012 at 10:26 AM
Which articles are disappearing?
#4 Posted by Sara Morrison, CJR on Tue 31 Jul 2012 at 11:39 AM
@Sara
Sorry, I meant "comments", not "articles".
There is a pretty clear distinction between a "personal attack" and the criticism of a plainly stated position.
When I call out the patently and facially racist position of a commenter here, and when I provide a direct quote of the position and a link to the entire dialogue... I am not engaging in any sort of a "personal attack". I am making valid and important criticism.
This is especially true when the commenter in question has criticized the racial views of another commenter.
Why bother having comments at all at CJR if all you want is pablum?
Deleting comments and suspending discourse every time someone here gets upset is hardly they conducive to CJR's stated mission.
#5 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Tue 31 Jul 2012 at 01:41 PM
CJR reserves the right to edit or delete comments that violate its commenting rules (stated here: http://www.cjr.org/about_us/privacy_policy.php).
Feel free to email editors@cjr.org if you wish to discuss this further; otherwise, please leave the comment section of this article for comments pertaining to the actual article. Thanks!
#6 Posted by Sara Morrison, CJR on Tue 31 Jul 2012 at 02:03 PM
Sara's no Justin Peters, padi. Your "hardball" shtick ain't going to fly with her.
As I have found out, she's not the type to spare the axe when a scalpel would do.
Anyways, back to the regularly scheduled commenting.
#7 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Tue 31 Jul 2012 at 02:22 PM
Just to be clear...
We aren't going to allow off-topic commenting at CJR?
That's the policy now?
I don't see that rule in the policy.
#8 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Tue 31 Jul 2012 at 03:58 PM
I said "please," as in, "would you be so kind as to use the comments section for the purpose they were intended," i.e. promoting discussion about the articles in a way that encourages everyone to read and participate and not hijacking sections to air out your own personal disputes with each other. That was a polite request, not an order.
You should just email the address I listed above if you're still having problems with this, because I don't see the point of continuing this conversation in this comments section. Thanks!
#9 Posted by Sara Morrison, CJR on Tue 31 Jul 2012 at 04:24 PM