Today the Pew Research Center for Excellence in Journalism released its annual “State of the Media” report, and it’s a mixed bag of good and bad news. According to the report, there are signs that the industry is beginning to recover “after two dreadful years”: hiring has picked up, as has revenue, and layoffs have slowed down somewhat.
At the same time, though, there is a nagging structural problem that only appears to be getting worse. As news organizations increasingly—and inevitably—come to depend on partnerships with third-party companies to stretch their newsrooms’ technological capacity, they also, unfortunately, lose control of vital audience data.
The report mentions social networks like Facebook and news aggregators like Google, upon which many news outlets depend to expand their readership and grow traffic. But the harshest language seems to be reserved for Apple, which, when hosting a news organization’s app on the iPhone or iPad, both keeps 30 percent of the revenue from the sale and also does not share the data about these sales. An excerpt from the report:
That data may be the most important commodity of all. In a media world where consumers decide what news they want to get and how they want to get it, the future will belong to those who understand the public’s changing behavior and can target content and advertising to snugly fit the interests of each user. That knowledge—and the expertise in gathering it—increasingly resides with technology companies outside journalism.
In the 20th century, the news media thrived by being the intermediary others needed to reach customers. In the 21st, increasingly there is a new intermediary: Software programmers, content aggregators and device makers control access to the public. The news industry, late to adapt and culturally more tied to content creation than engineering, finds itself more a follower than leader shaping its business.
There is evidence, however, that this structure won’t last. Outsourcing the distribution duties and the technical know-how seems unavoidable in this age, but news organizations probably won’t tolerate being in the dark about their own customers:
News companies are trying to push back. One new effort involves online publishers starting their own ad exchanges, rather than having middlemen to do it for them. NBC, CBS and Forbes are among those launching their own, tired of sharing revenue and having third parties take their audience data.
Pew also highlights some significant “firsts” across the online news universe, indicating that the move from print to web has reached an important tipping point. They are:
1) “Original reporting job hires at major online only news sites for the first time matched or exceeded the job losses in newspapers.”
2) “For the first time, more people said they got news from the web than newspapers.”
3) “When the final tally is in, online ad revenue in 2010 is projected to surpass print newspaper ad revenue for the first time.”
A big caveat to that last point, though: although web audience and revenue both surpassed newspaper audience and revenue for the first time ever, that didn’t necessarily help news websites: “by far the largest share of that online ad revenue goes to non-news sources, particularly to aggregators.”
Pew’s entire report is available here, and is chock full of useful statistics about readers’ habits, circulation numbers, revenue, and hiring trends. CJR previously wrote about the 2010 State of the Media report, Pew’s interactive feature about this past year of news, and its warning about the “Twitter echo chamber” —a warning that it probably wouldn’t hurt to revisit every few months or so, knowing us tweet-happy journos.
RESULT: Layoffs, downsizing, shut-downs, etc.
SYMPTOM: Shift from MSM "news" to non-MSM blogs, aggregators, etc.
CAUSE: Pro-govt bias, deception, cover-ups, media-govt incest, etc.
CURE: Stop acting as court historians. Stop playing bed-buddy with "official sources." Stop taking the official story as Gospel. Stop presenting the federal govt as infallible and authoritative in all areas. Stop pretending the left-right and REP-DEM divides are much more than a govt tool for divide-and-conquer. Question govt authority and policy on legal, practical, and moral grounds.
Here is the best analysis yet on the state of news media.
#1 Posted by Dan A., CJR on Mon 14 Mar 2011 at 12:20 PM
I was laid off from a print industry advertising job earlier this year and I can say from expereience that even with a move to the web, most print publication companies are very ill-suited to connect with audiences in that way.
And, sorry, but it is NOT the responsibility of companies like Apple to 'save' the old school media industry by making it easier for them to target audiences, or by not taking a cut of the profit. In what other business would that possibly be expected? It's as if you want cell phone users to not use their cell phones to talk to each over long distances because the telegraph industry is in trouble because of it.
The news media organizations, both print and the major 'news' outlets have shot themselves in the foot, believing that people would stay with them even when other better, more nuanced, and wider coverage of events became available. They did this to themselves and it is not up to Apple or any other third party industry or company- or to consumers- to save them now.
#2 Posted by ReesieKitty, CJR on Tue 15 Mar 2011 at 09:19 AM
Designer purses carry a lucrative and mysterious past. If you can imagine, purses were carried in the form of bags that attached to belts (the prehistoric fanny-pack) and were usually made of simple cloth with a single leather band. Far from beginning as a fashion statement, purses were initially used primarily for function, and not fashion, which is a horrific thought for the modern woman! and [url=http://www.lisanala.com/Cheap-wallets-purse_c124 Designer purses] have become the epicenter of modern fashion and society.
#3 Posted by Designer purses , CJR on Fri 30 Mar 2012 at 11:04 PM