GM: I guess the one thing that I learned through all of this is that there still is that bastion of journalistic integrity. Especially with the staff at the station - they were so tremendous in standing up to this, and so strong-willed in their belief that they needed to do what was right and that the station needed to maintain its journalistic integrity. And that was from a young staff. And just the support I’ve gotten from people over the past couple of weeks-it’s very humbling.
- 1
- 2
the station still has a credibility problem. if anybody in management at that station had either a brain and/or a shred of integrity, they'd realize that their station cannot be trusted again if maibe is not offered his job back. otherwise, isn't the message to the news staff -- including maibe's successor -- that questioning even the most offensive of decisions is one way to lose a job? if management would hire maibe back, little reason would remain for quesioning every story that airs until/unless that happens.
Posted by bemusednomore![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.cjr.org/nav-commenters.gif)
on Sat 26 Jan 2008 at 07:14 AM