COLORADO — In my post last week on the emerging network of watchdog sites that document the role of money in politics, I suggested that many small and mid-sized media outlets, like local newspapers and TV stations, are not getting as much value as they could out of these specialty sites—and so aren’t serving their readers as well as they might.
A bit of outreach to a few of those outlets here in Colorado confirmed that impression. Political reporters are generally aware of resources like the Center for Responsive Politics’ OpenSecrets.org, the Sunlight Foundation’s suite of campaign-finance tools, and National Institute on Money in State Politics’ FollowTheMoney.org, and they do use them in their reporting—if not always as often as they could. But reporters and editors generally aren’t attuned to features like widgets and APIs that would allow local news organizations to bring relevant campaign-finance data directly to their readers.
The digital experts in these newsrooms, meanwhile, aren’t always focused on politics. (One digital content director told me he’d never heard of the widgets available from these sites.) And even when they are, the web folks often have competing concerns in mind. Josh Stephenson, digital director for The Durango Herald and three other papers in the state, told me he and his colleagues “would love to tap into” the information compiled by FollowTheMoney in particular. But they would want to use a customizable API in the interest of “maintaining consistent look and feel across the website,” and so far they haven’t had the resources to do so. (Stephenson didn’t mention it, but the prefab widgets offered at FollowTheMoney are actually just OK; OpenSecrets and the Sunlight Foundation offer better resources on this score.)
To anyone who’s worked in a shrinking newsroom, these hurdles are understandable. But they should also be surmountable. In the interest of encouraging local news organizations to take better advantage of the resources these sites offer—either to inform traditional reporting, or to get information to voters in other ways—here are pointers to some of the most interesting data and most useful features:
● It sounds almost silly to mention it, but the search functions at these sites are all terrific, especially compared to the finicky nature of many government sites. Edwin Bender, executive director of the National Institute on Money in State Politics, pointed me to the search bar when I asked about the best features at his organization’s campaign-finance website, and he’s right. When Newt Gingrich’s biggest benefactor was in the news, I wanted to see if he’d poured any money into my home state, so I plugged “Sheldon Adelson Colorado” into the search bar at FollowTheMoney.org. I got one hit—a donation in 2004. That year, Adelson gave $100,000 to Coloradans Against a Really Stupid Idea, a group that helped defeat a measure that would have scrapped Colorado’s winner-take-all system electoral system and apportioned its nine electoral votes according to popular vote. (If you’re searching the Sunlight Foundation’s data for a politician or donor, you’ll want to use the foundation’s Influence Explorer page.)
● FollowTheMoney—which looks only at state races and offices, not federal—also offers a smart feature called L-CAT, short for Legislative Committee Analysis Tool. This tool identifies donors to lawmakers who sit on the powerful legislative committees that in most state legislatures decide which bills are introduced. Bender explains why he likes this function: if a lobbyist for a utility company testifies at an Energy and Natural Resources Committee hearing, for example, a reporter covering that hearing might consult L-CAT to find out quickly if that utility has donated to members of the committee, and if so, to add the information to his or her story.